@tokenbender It doesn’t count if they’re putting the limits back to what they were five weeks ago
English
Aux
382 posts
Aux
@__12124__
npm uninstall -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code && npm install -g @openai/codex
Katılım Ocak 2025
79 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
thank you openai for repeatedly removing rate limits from codex.
i love competitive markets as a consumer.
Claude@claudeai
Effective today, we are: 1) Doubling Claude Code’s 5-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, and Team plans; 2) Removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max plans; and 3) Substantially raising our API rate limits for Opus models.
English
@theo I bet he hates Claude Code as much as he does humans
x.com/austen/status/…
Austen Allred@Austen
Stuff like this says more about your perception of humans than your perception of AI models
English
Is there any public examples of Dario talking about the Claude Code team? Sometimes feels like he ignores the product side of Anthropic
English
@thsottiaux @charliermarsh You can spawn new worktrees but cannot start a new conversation in that same worktree
Makes it essentially impossible to work on multiple things at once without making one giant conversation in the worktree you spawned.
Aka “continue from” need ls a worktree option
English
The 2x price increase basically made me lose all interest in gpt 5.5
English
Modern alternative for your Typescript stack:
- underscore/lodash → es-toolkit
- eslint/prettier → biome or oxc
- husky → lefthook from @evilmartians
- jest → vitest (it's faaast)
- node → bun (not everyone's cup of tea but give it a try)
- tsc → tsgo (it's in beta now!)
What else?
English
$5 per mil in, $30 per mil out.
GPT-5.5 is smart. I've been using it for a bit. It's also weird, hard to wrangle, and too expensive IMO.
Double the price of GPT-5.4. 20% more expensive than Opus 4.7.
OpenAI@OpenAI
Introducing GPT-5.5 A new class of intelligence for real work and powering agents, built to understand complex goals, use tools, check its work, and carry more tasks through to completion. It marks a new way of getting computer work done. Now available in ChatGPT and Codex.
English
@ilshadyX @weswinder Claude it such utter dogshit that it isn’t even close
English
gpt-5.4 is still so much better than opus 4.7 and it’s not even close
English
what if OpenAI repeats the Codex 5.3 + Opus 4.6 release day and drops Spud 20 minutes after Opus 4.7 is released
English
@samlambert Still going to be worse than 5.4
Or it will get mogged within 15 minutes of release like 4.6 did
English
@ericvishria Why would you ”Opus” anything when you could “Codex” everything?
Better performance, fewer tokens per task, AND less than half the price
English
Seeing this all over. The efficiency and rationalization push is coming.
Initially it was just getting everyone to use AI all over. "Opus everything!"
Now the spend is material and companies will rationalize.
Anissa Gardizy@anissagardizy8
Uber's CTO told @LauraBratton5 that AI coding tools—particularly Anthropic’s Claude Code—has already maxed out its 2026 AI budget 📈 “I'm back to the drawing board, because the budget I thought I would need is blown away already,” Neppalli Naga said. theinformation.com/newsletters/ap…
English
@Jacoob_shi @yacineMTB 5.3 mogged 4.6 within 15 minutes of it getting released
English
@yacineMTB the whole AI calendar is just "wait for openai drop, then release yours with 48hrs of breathing room" lmao it's so predictable at this point
English
My entire feed and the Claude subreddit is full of ppl saying opus got nerfed.
Why would Anthropic nerf its own models?
English
This is also why people like and *think* Claude is better
Theo - t3.gg@theo
It's silly, but this example perfectly illustrates what I hate about Opus. Claude models treat the prompt as a vibe. GPT models treat them as instructions. When asked about what runtime to use, Opus recommends Bun, even though it only really works as a package manager here. Codex immediately answers the question clearly, and gives the right context each point along the way.
English
Bro i have to spoon feed codex with everything
Its not the same with claude
Tibo@thsottiaux
Codex is for wizards
English
The Anthropic hate is insane. They build a great product, most of you barely pay them anything, and everyone feels like they’re entitled to kick and scream about a big nothingburger.
English
@krishtopheer The docs for a long time recommended using Claude for OpenClaw bozo
English
And yet he named it Clawdbot and not openbot, codexbot.
I wonder why.
Peter, you are better than this.
It’s okay to be silent when someone says your competitors have an edge over you and work to make your product better.
Peter Steinberger 🦞@steipete
@work_____ OpenClaw was mostly built by codex.
English
@theWiredMage @DanielGL_I @Silas_Tompkins @GithubProjects No passado mano
Eles (finalmente) acabaram consertando isso
Português
English
Go developers know the pain:
if err != nil
if err != nil
if err != nil
Dingo is trying something interesting.
A meta-language that compiles to clean Go but adds things like:
• Result types
• Pattern matching
• Error propagation with `?`
Write modern syntax → get pure Go.
English
So, uh, what subscription should I be using for my OpenClaw now? 🙃
English
