gaius cassius bomaye

Early retirement starter pack: • 2000 Toyota Corolla • Batman Lunchbox from 1998 • Black coffee • Vanguard ETFs Net worth somehow $1.7 million

The Sandy River valley is awash in amish. Five horse buggies on Rt 2 this morning Makes sense, I guess; it's decent farmland but nobody could grow anything that would actually pay for itself and comply with laws

this is an argument i will never get. "it's deserved" i didn't do shit to get born here. it's not deserved. it's luck. and most people are unlucky as hell

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: You can't earn a billion dollars. Ilana Glazer: That's right. AOC: You just can't earn that. Glazer: That's exactly correct. AOC: You can get market power. You can break rules. You can do all sorts of things. You can abuse labor laws. Glazer: Yup. AOC: You can pay people less than what they're worth. Glazer: Yup. AOC: But you can't earn that, right? Glazer: That's right. AOC: And so you have to create a myth that -- since you didn't earn that, you have to create a myth of earning it.

🚨 University professors have been saying AI is completely destroying learning and that we'll soon have an AI-powered, semi-illiterate workforce. Here's a glimpse into the educational apocalypse: "Sarah, a freshman at Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, said she first used ChatGPT to cheat during the spring semester of her final year of high school. (...) After getting acquainted with the chatbot, Sarah used it for all her classes: Indigenous studies, law, English, and a “hippie farming class” called Green Industries. “My grades were amazing,” she said. “It changed my life.” Sarah continued to use AI when she started college this past fall. Why wouldn’t she? Rarely did she sit in class and not see other students’ laptops open to ChatGPT. Toward the end of the semester, she began to think she might be dependent on the website. She already considered herself addicted to TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and Reddit, where she writes under the username maybeimnotsmart. “I spend so much time on TikTok,” she said. “Hours and hours, until my eyes start hurting, which makes it hard to plan and do my schoolwork. With ChatGPT, I can write an essay in two hours that normally takes 12.” - "By November, Williams estimated that at least half of his students were using AI to write their papers. Attempts at accountability were pointless. Williams had no faith in AI detectors, and the professor teaching the class instructed him not to fail individual papers, even the clearly AI-smoothed ones. “Every time I brought it up with the professor, I got the sense he was underestimating the power of ChatGPT, and the departmental stance was, ‘Well, it’s a slippery slope, and we can’t really prove they’re using AI,’” Williams said. “I was told to grade based on what the essay would’ve gotten if it were a ‘true attempt at a paper.’ So I was grading people on their ability to use ChatGPT.” - AI in education is a serious topic, and many schools and universities are blindly jumping into the "AI-first" wave without considering short and long-term consequences. It would be great to hear more from teachers and educators to understand potential solutions. This might be a great opportunity for rethinking the education system and how students are assessed. - 👉 Link to the full article below. 👉 To learn more about AI's legal and ethical challenges, join my newsletter's 94,700+ subscribers (link below).

see, i disagree! as standalone sentences, maybe, but in the context of the tweet, the rhythm of "to make firewood" just lines up better in my head. claude identified it as a "linked ictus", but it's also something about how heavy the prior paragraph is vs. the abrupt but light cutoff of "kindling" i do expect that i'm the weird one here. i rush the "Stra-di" syllables and heavily emphasize the VAR syllable, which creates a better parallel rhythm with "to make FIRE-wood"

TFW you become a "moderate" since the only real solution for society is nearly total destruction and genetic/cultural replacement, which will come in it's own good time. So in the meantime there isn't much point in utopian political agitations, just clean your room.

Every lawyer should read decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States even when they dont apply to their jurisdiction. Pure legal art. The legal reasoning and writing is phenomenal.

Maybe cuz ur out of state? Skill issue

Anon submission