Jason Lerner
4.1K posts


@nolanmunderwood @kslachowin @BobHenryRob @TylerKoerth However it was originally called it should never be overturned as the replay doesn’t show convincing evidence either way. Had it been ruled no catch it should have stood. Bad job overturning the original call of good catch.
English

@kslachowin @BobHenryRob @TylerKoerth yeah after watching the replays as a cardinals fan i agree lol, i was super surprised they overturned that
English

@heyitsmiller @achester99 He’s talking about the reliever Mike Stanton. Pitched for the Braves and the Yankees, Mets for Kroger but, and other teams in the 90s and early 2000s.
English

@agingroy How are we doing compared to other countries? That is way more interesting to me…
English

In 1880, a newborn in the US could expect to live to 39. Today, 78.
Most people think that's just because fewer babies died. It's not.
A 45-year-old back then could expect to reach 68. Now it's 82. A 65-year-old? Gained nearly a decade. Even 80-year-olds live 3 years longer.
We didn't fix one thing at the start of life. We got better at keeping people alive at every stage of it.
That's a huge win for all.
@OurWorldInData

English

@FluentInFinance I don’t like it. However, that is an extremely short flight, under 350 miles.
English

@jkcottrell51 @nut_history By definition a ball that hits the foul pole (before hitting the ground) is a home run in every ballpark. Clearly this was a home run. It went off the fielders glove and then hit the foul pole. Anything that happens after that is irrelevant.
English

@nut_history The ball was touched in fair territory. If the field’s ground rules state that the foul pole(s) are located behind the wall, then that is a home run. That’s the only way you get a home run in this situation. The key question goes to ground rules for the field. I’m okay with it.
English

@DannyAbriano Can’t wait to see the catch probability on that one!
English

This is just ridiculous
Pretty much all the attention has been on Carson Benge’s offense, which is understandable. But he’s been an elite defender, which is massively important
SNY@SNYtv
OH WOW, CARSON BENGE!
English

@nicksortor What is that like a 6000% reduction or something? Haha
English

@BlorfGuy @James_Schiano I’m not saying he isn’t a good hitter. I just don’t get saying he’s never been this bad for a 30 game stretch except for a full season when he was. Seems silly to me!
English

@darrylstraw18 @James_Schiano He has 81 games of being injured and playing bad vs 5 other seasons of being a really good hitter
English

@HazelAppleyard So easily the pushups. I love doing pushups. 100 a day is $1,000! Take off 30 days a year and still $335,000 per year. 3 years and there is just over 1M.
English

@James_Schiano I see others that made the same comment I did. I don’t see what’s shocking about him having his current ops for 30 games since he spent his entire 2024 at that ops! We all hope/expect it will go up, but I still find your initial comment weak.
English

@loukabatnik Benge is way too soon to say he has disappointed. He's incomplete, not enough data yet. The rest I fully agree with. Still hold out the most hope for Alvarez because he is a catcher.
English

@DanBartels2 I was actually thinking they may go after him this past offseason hoping there was still some lightening left in the bottle and they could get him real cheap.
English

@John_Brian_K @LarryJones All restaurants should operate on the same model (just like they do now with tipping). If all restaurants switch to charging more and not asking their customers to tip then we all get used to higher prices for the food but not having to pay tips. It’s pretty simple.
English

The current model runs on tips...you have no idea the margins for a restaurant. Most of the owners make damn near nothing to begin with...you want them to add 40% to payroll costs...what do you think happens? The cost of the food goes way up, people come in see the prices and most probably leave before they even know why....IF....IF they stay long enough to understand what the owner is doing AND...AND agree with the idea, MAYBE they come back.
English

@balkwhisperer Only if the player touches it. If they don’t touch it then it is ruled a foul ball.
English

When the ball is in front of the base it is fair if any part of the ball is on or OVER the line.
Talkin' Baseball@TalkinBaseball_
Home plate umpire Dan Merzel called the ball fair, giving Matt Shaw a single despite it appearing clearly foul
English

@tangotiger Only if a player makes the mistake of touching it! If the player lets it sit there and doesn’t touch it the umpire would then have to rule it foul.
Check the wording in the rule book.
English

For some reason, I thought it was contact with ground
In fact, it's the same rule as in football in terms of breaking the plane
In other words, if the center of the ball is in foul territory, but is within ~1.45 inches of the foul line, then the ball is consider fair
Brock Seeman@brockseeman
@Ecnerwal23 Check this out
English

@DHiggins815 @fatalfr13nd @ScoringChanges A fair fly ball eventually touches the ground and you have to have rules for when that happens (unless it is a homer).
English

@fatalfr13nd @ScoringChanges No. Just no. A ball that is in contact with the ground is not a fly ball anymore. Jesus.
English

Everyone’s response is dealing with a fly ball beyond first or third that hasn’t touched fair territory yet. For THAT, the bottom of the ball has to hit the actual line.
On the ball in question it already touched in fair territory and is inside the bases, so as long as any part of the ball is over the line, it’s fair.
Also here is the thing with me…I know the rules and I generally don’t jump in unless I know the rule. I cited the @CloseCallSports video of an identical play with the Yankees that explained why this is a fair ball.
While my expertise is in scoring, part of that is knowing the rules in and out. In my other life and real job (in sports) part of what makes me good there and I have the rule books for many sports very well memorized.
Both umpires saw that a part of the ball was over the line, and they were adamant on it.
John@JohnMccholl
@ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ Can you please acknowledge and address the numerous responses that appear to cite a new rule contradicting your analysis? It’s ok to be wrong (if that’s the case), but it’s a huge credibility hit if you just ignore the counterpoints entirely.
English















