FED up defi user retweetledi
FED up defi user
48 posts


@LefterisJP I disagree vehemently.
Two things to keep in mind:
Computers were the domain of nerds back in the days, you are comparing a whole generation nowadays with a tiny subset of the prior generation.
Prompting/ Intents are getting way more important, we are just getting better at UX.
English

I get the feeling that computer literacy is decreasing.
We are getting a lot more "screen" users, the majority of whom are doomscrolling or swipe left/swipe right zombies. People that need everything dumbed down for them and just consume, consume, consume.
This is dangerous for our society as a whole.
A world where you grow up surrounded by digital devices but are only mindlessly fed content through them is a dystopia.
We need more tinkerers. We need more curiosity. We need more hackers.
English

@koeppelmann @sparkdotfi ^ anything in the works to offer fixed yield rates?
English

@koeppelmann @sparkdotfi Uncertainty. Give me Pendle like fixed PT rates and I am all for it.
English

On @sparkdotfi on Gnosis you can supply s(exy)DAI - that earns 10.52% - with that you can borrow EURe where you only have to pay 3.02%. This you can turn into more sDAI and borrow even more. What stops you from doing this?
English

@GwartyGwart Can we please highlight the fact that the $uwu valuation wasn't affected at all by the hack?
Truly a decentralized governance token par excellence, unaffected by minor protocol setbacks that aren't directly related to stewarding an innovative project.
English

@_JohnWhelan @SomerEsat I am probably missing something, but how are L1 staking rewards going to change anything or lead to a significant increase in L2 usage? With 3-4% APY they should be pretty much irrelevant
English

@SomerEsat Once the L2s figure out how to deliver L1 staking rewards directly to the L2S, then a huge amount of activity will migrate from the L1.
English

@Mudit__Gupta For security reasons your cold wallets should be multisigs anyways 🤷♂️
English

@lawmaster @FrankResearcher @0xAfif @spreekaway @hasufl @ViktorBunin I just aced the OG quizz in 1 second, those are rookie numbers

English

At this point, five people scored 100% and none of them were exactly surprising. People who got 100% so far:
1. @FrankResearcher (9.5 minutes)
2. @0xAfif (10.5 minutes)
3. @spreekaway (18 minutes)
4. @hasufl (20 minutes)
5. @ViktorBunin (23 minutes)
Another 9 people scored 99%
English

A couple of days ago I started a fun experiment that has since gotten a bit out of hand. I created a group on @echodotxyz with a simple condition - score over 90% on my crypto test. Since then, 1k+ accounts have taken the test and my DMs have been absolutely flooded

English

Sad to see that Dai seems to be uniquely penalized with a higher cut for the DAO on Aave compared to USDC and USDT
Marc Zeller@Marczeller
Here's some interesting DAO revenue data you are probably not aware of: 1 GHO minted is the same in terms of revenue as: - 6 USDC on Aave V3 ETH - 2.4 DAI borrowed on Aave V3 - 32.79 pyUSD borrowed on Morpho blue - 13.4 USDC on Spark There's no second best.
English


@GwartyGwart don't be too harsh on them, their primary business model are points and not blocks
English

@arnaudschenk Having an espresso machine for variety is super nice, though I have to say that I am mostly switching to chemex/aeropress after the first espresso in the morning.
Using a Lelit Bianca with a flow profiler for now (pressensor.com/products/press…) but will update to the new decent asap.
English

@defi_fed I’m a v60 guy, though I’m considering the linea mini
English

@arnaudschenk oh nice 👍
Which espresso machine are you using with it?
English

@ercwl @sachayve @basileSportif Haven’t looked too much into blobs, but isn’t there a difference between DA and data storage?
#birth-of-a-blob" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">domothy.com/blobspace/#bir…

English

happy for you to go off on a rant on this, you have blue so use the longform if you please
my understanding is a rollup uses L1 for DA. L1 DA typically behaves in such a way that full nodes (eg geth —syncmode=full) will store all the historic data incl the CALLDATA pertaining to every rollup on its HDD. this data can, at any time, by any fullnode, be used to reconstruct the L2 state and execute the proper unilateral exit functions to withdraw your funds to the L1
in an ephemeral data blob world, you merely verify that the data exists and then you move on. after a specific time period (2 weeks) the blob is removed from your HDD. start up a new node, now you rely on *someone else* to serve you with that crucial data, and the problem is that full nodes (that have been designed to be able to run on modest computer hardware) won’t actually be able to provide you with the necessary data to call your exit-to-L1 function.
you now rely on blobstoring nodes, but because their data requirements are so much greater, it is not the ”Ethereum fullnode network” we can rely on for exit guarantees, but a subset of nodes that haven’t been constrained enough in resource requirements to be universally accessible.
that is why blobspace cannot be equated to L1 data, and thus the term ”rollup” ceases to mean the same thing in a post-4844 world. indeed, celestia has similar issues but atleast in celestia there is the theoretical ability to restore blocks from enough light client samples rather than archival blobstoring nodes.
very happy to be corrected on this 🙏
English

@lyrafinance tears of $LYRA token holders? Heavily appreciating asset atm
English

@pintail_xyz @Lomashuk infra costs don't matter imho, the UX is just so bad that it's only natural that people will buy LSTs instead of doing solo staking. Solo staking needs additional incentives and the proposed change make the status qup for SSPs even worse.
English

@Lomashuk There's definitely space to debate the right stake ratio to target. To me it seems as though it should be <50%. I disagree re: Coinbase. Infra costs are negligible for home stakers and staking at home will remain more profitable than sharing yield with Coinbase.
English










