The point is . . .

@AAipac @barstoolsports Autism? I believe you mean tourettetes syndrome.

@barstoolsports This is the best video out there no AI required. Autism is awesome

The GOATs of all GOATs: Lionel Messi Joey Chestnut Tom Brady Bird Call Kid

@artisamurai @Rainmaker1973 People who want punishment over healing misunderstand both science and humanity.

@Rainmaker1973 I only want one thing if this vaccine succeeds. People who refused to take mRNA vaccine before should be prohibited from taking it even if they get cancer.

Cancer immunity in a shot. Scientists at the University of Florida have created a breakthrough mRNA cancer vaccine that erased deadly brain tumors in early human trials without chemo or radiation. Tested on four glioblastoma patients, the vaccine reprogrammed their immune systems within 48 hours to attack the tumor. Built from each patient’s own tumor cells and delivered via lipid nanoparticles, it showed success similar to earlier tests in mice and dogs. It is now moving into Phase 1 pediatric trials.

@TaraBull Pathetic

In a word, describe actor Mark Hamill

@atensnut I guess this explains why he's the only president to ever wave his $2.5 million salary?

STFU, Opie.

@bighurtrocks @ClownWorld Lol. Same here.

@ClownWorld Ohhhhh…Hannah’s the big one! Sorry, watching with the sound off 🤷🏻‍♂️😂

A single DUI is a deportable offense for non-citizens. It also permanently bars most people from ever becoming U.S. citizens due to lack of good moral character. If George Farmer was naturalized in 2025 and had an undisclosed DUI on his record, he committed immigration fraud by failing to report it. Fraud on a citizenship application is grounds for denaturalization and deportation. The law should apply equally, no exceptions for the well-connected. America first means one set of rules for everyone. @StateDept @SecRubio @USCIS

@TaraBull Do like I do and order your groceries online for pick up or delivery. If it's true your problem is solved.

New conspiracy theory unlocked 🔑

Interesting

@SedonaPsychic @araghchi You do not speak on behalf of all Americans and certainly not this one!

Thank you, Sir. For your mercy to USA. We have damaged your nation greatly, senselessly & stupidly. On behalf of all Americans, I'm deeply sorry for damage & killing we caused. You & your nation are the bedrock of humanity. Its greatness and strength. The world cannot lose Iran to a holocaust, as beset by Bibi & Trump. Your grace at negotiating with us is immense. It shows your good, God-connected soul. Thank you. I pray for peace in your region & for all Iranians. Thank you.

Statement on behalf of the Supreme National Security Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran:

@RobertK_2142 @JamesTate121 Funny!

Walk the Walk MAGA!

President Trump isn't going to let anyone stop him from Making America Great Again. Not Putin. Not Xi. Not Iran. President Trump is the man we need to trust to FINISH the job and save the world!

🚨 BREAKING: The now-rescued F-15 WSO evaded Iranian forces by hiking away from the wreckage, hiding on a ridge, and putting out an emergency beacon, and using SERE training to survive, per Fox Despite an intense firefight, NO AMERICANS were kiIIed in the operation. This was an INCREDIBLY complex operation, consisting of many elite U.S. Special Operations rescue forces including U.S. Air Force Pararescuemen (PJs)

Let's be VERY clear about something: if Joe Biden had led a military operation THIS successful in Iran the way President Trump has, the mainstream media would be kissing the ground he walked on. It doesn't matter how great a job President Trump does, the media will always lie.

@dom_lucre “cock a doodle do, folks.”😂 you CHOPPED the start of this masterpiece! see:

@dom_lucre I got one too… 😉 ❤️ and now I got two.

@Gandalf_da_Grey @JimStephenson53 @DrJStrategy He's admitted that yes. But he also studies and observes then consults experts before doing so. You talk like he just has a feeling and goes with it which he doesn't. There is a distinct difference in how he does things and how you perceive he does things.

At least you didn’t respond with a barrage of insults like everyone else, thank you lol I’ve never had such quick replies to my posts and in such numbers. Since you were nice, I will add that I hope this situation works out. But I don’t understand people’s needs to talk about these politicians like they’re their boyfriends. Trump has admitted that he goes with his instincts. He is not a thinker or a planner. He thought they’d surrender immediately and now is just reacting to the situation, and vomiting his wildly fluctuating emotions on Truth Social.

Food for thought. Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface. The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities. Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed. In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines. In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive. A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent. By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right. In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.

@ThrillaRilla369 I could. I did. I'd do it again.

To the women who are on this app, be honest If you could stay home, raise babies and run a cozy homemaker life.. Would you??

This is the best takedown of "No Kings" I've seen yet. "You just hate what you're told to hate..." "I just wish the anti-authoritarian energy was present during actual tyranny." 🔥

I am a Democrat. I served in the Clinton administration. I did not vote for Donald Trump and am highly unlikely to support him or his acolytes in the future. I also have serious disagreements with many of the Trump administration’s domestic and foreign policies. But it is profoundly disturbing that a growing segment of the far left appears to be almost rooting for Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iranian regime, and other forces fundamentally opposed to the United States and our allies. This seems to reflects a corrosive strain of anti-Americanism, dressed up in postcolonial theory, that risks blinding us to the moral realities of our world and the nature of our adversaries.

@Francis_Watts @DefiantLs You missed the best part where she said WHY she wanted to replicate him: she thought what he did BRILLIANT!

@DefiantLs She says that Charlie wasn't pro free speech, but if you listen to the end she says she wants to "replicate" what charlie did. By her own standard, she's against free speech.

Liberal: "Do you think that Charlie Kirk stood for free speech?" Piers Morgan: "Absolutely." Liberal meltdown