Straight Lines

5.3K posts

Straight Lines banner
Straight Lines

Straight Lines

@econometricks

Mstat Econometrics & MPhil in International Relations Theory from @UUtah. Currency substitution theory. 🫶my 4 kids, Paris, Carmel CA, DMV, SLC, Duxbury

Trantor Katılım Ekim 2011
1.6K Takip Edilen805 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
I’m a skeptic, a doubter, an agnostic, unable to properly believe in anything. I’ve spent my whole life wondering what’s real, what works, what is the universe, how big is it, how can I make sense of the incredible complexity of it, of life and humanity? The arc moved me to study first religion, then self-help and business management literature, jungian psychology, masculinity, psychometrics, money and economics, international relations theory, and now philosophy. I’m thoroughly frustrated by my “midwit” level of intelligence and for my poor memory, but I keep trying to find the answers. I can’t seem to stop searching. My heros are Isaac Asimov and Alexander Hamilton. My favorite books are, in order: Anna Karenina Foundation (15 books in all.) Lord of the Rings (+ Silmarillion) Report on the Subject of Manufactures Iron John, A book about men He, She, We, King, Warrior, Magician, Lover… A Theory of Justice (Rawls) Johnathan Livingston Seagull The Little Prince The Phantom Tollbooth I’d say politically I’m a liberal Democrat who isn’t woke and have been so my whole life. I have, on occasion, voted for republicans. My biggest political bugaboo is gun rights. I’d happily repeal the 2nd amendment. I think my thought about political things is best exemplified by the ideas of Constructivism as discussed in International relations theory. I value good character, morals and ethics; I have the worst case of TDS anywhere online. irl, I compute BASEL capital holding requirements for derivatives at large banks. I’ve spent a lot of my life working in restaurants, HVAC companies, and various delivery jobs. I didn’t go to college until late in life (2005) and graduated with all my degrees in 2010. I’m Gen X, quintessentialy. Fit the stereotype to a T. Thank you for reading and enjoy life!
English
4
0
7
1.2K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@GiaMMacool What men fail to understand most today, IMO, is that much of life is ashes. Many wise people have noted that most of WHAT YOU DO CONTROL in life is your attitude, how you decide to frame, think of, and compose the stories in your head. Read this: a.co/d/04VO0mnf
English
0
0
1
7
Gia Macool
Gia Macool@GiaMMacool·
A lot of these guys follow me, like my content, even say they love my tweets when I’m calling women out only. But the moment I point out men also have responsibility, they flip. No response to the point. Just personal attacks. They’ll dig through hundreds of posts to find one bikini pic. One. 🤣 That becomes the argument. Not ideas. Not facts. Just character attacks. that’s called deflection and avoidance. So they get blocked. And then it turns into “it’s her fault.” Always. No accountability. Ironically, the original post wasn’t even about women, it was about men dropping the victim mindset and taking responsibility. But that’s a trigger in 2026. Because victim content is addictive. It removes responsibility and feels good to consume. So they follow red pill accounts built on male frustration, get validation, feel understood… Then call anyone speaking truth, a grifter.
Rob and Avis Ramble@rob_avis_ramble

@mrGlennLawrence @GiaMMacool @LZegmaar50669 I’m confused. What is scandalous about posting a picture with your husband and/or being a fitness model encouraging other women that they can be fit too for their husbands if they want? -R

English
10
4
36
2.7K
Straight Lines retweetledi
Give A Shit About Nature
Give A Shit About Nature@giveashitnature·
France passed a law requiring solar panels on every parking lot with more than 80 spaces. Parking lots over a certain size have three to five years to cover at least half their surface area with solar canopies or face fines. The projected output: up to 11 gigawatts of capacity, the equivalent of 10 nuclear reactors. The panels shade the cars. They can charge EVs directly underneath them. They generate electricity for the grid. The parking lot goes from dead infrastructure to power plant without using a single additional acre of land. France plans to increase solar tenfold and double wind capacity by 2033. The US has approximately 800 million parking spaces. Eight hundred million. Most of them are uncovered asphalt sitting in direct sunlight. Why aren't we doing this?
Give A Shit About Nature tweet mediaGive A Shit About Nature tweet media
English
503
2K
8K
262.4K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@CynicalPublius @ConceptualJames The pope is doing what pope’s do: Speaking for peace. Trump is doing what Trump does: Managing the narrative. No Epstein, no bad ICE vibes, no focus on Crypto scams, airplanes, payola deals, emoluments… Keep the reality show going… “Stay tuned for the next episode”. JESUS!
English
0
0
1
42
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
Well it looks like the Pope’s interference in American politics is still top of the news cycle, so I want to repeat something. The Democrat/Media Complex deliberately set this up so faithful Catholics would be forced to choose: Trump or your faith? That’s a false dichotomy. The Pope is speaking on politics, offering his opinion only and he is not speaking ex cathedra. You are not obligated to agree with the Pope in these matters where he speaks as an ordinary human. If you are a Catholic, you can still support Trump, and disagree with what the Pope is saying about the Iran War and American politics, and still remain true to your Catholic faith. Please do not fall for the either/or con job.
English
992
3.7K
11.5K
116.8K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
This article is the 10,000 attempt to rationalize, after the fact, the irrational, wrt DJT. No one was printing or offering this false analysis before the war, or for the war. Trump had an opportunity, in his made to make me look tough video, before the attack, to lay down anything serious about why or for what, we were going to war for. If he said anything in it, it was a contradiction to the things he’d said about Iran less than a year before. Because he’s just a lying grifter. Because, as always, there is and was no plan beyond making him look strong and changing the narrative. This Cynical X account, and most of why it is now entirely right wing media, (no left wing media remains,) all now owned by malicious right wing elites, that are the fake news Trump has at long last ceased shouting much about. Because the media has been bought, and has cowered to him. And will not tell you what I will here, for fear of his authoritarian retribution. This lengthy article collapses in the face of an extraordinarily simple analysis like this, which while no easier to “prove” or to “source” is nonetheless, using ockham’s razor, almost surely more correct and closer to the facts & the truth: ***** Trump went to war to move the narrative away from Epstein and bad ICE vibes. ***** He took his own recommendation that he had expected Obama to do years ago in one of Trump’s most infamous interviews. Whatever other “facts” in that lengthy article turn out to be true, they will always remain mere justifications for the above analysis. Because nothing in that article was made clear to anyone AHEAD OF TIME. Not to anyone in the public, anyone in the Congress, or even the fucking gang of 8. I’m not insinuating some grand plot or secret chess scheme by anyone. Lord knows, and the entire world knows, Trump is incurious and incompetent; utterly incapable of such thinking himself. He is basically a one trick pony: Manage the vibes and the narrative to make me look strong & to keep me in, or increase, my power. There is NEVER anything else going on with him or his administration, other than a constant grind on the corruption and grift.
English
0
0
0
19
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
If there were a way to test and display moral and ethical character that would be a lot more helpful. The two combined would be excellent. In particular, we need to know if the person is capable enough to do the job [IQ std deviations] and if they are more service minded (George Washington) or self-service minded (Donald Trump) [character.]
English
0
0
1
11
Penny2x
Penny2x@imPenny2x·
Do you think everyone should know their personal IQ? What about politicians, should we have transparency into their objective measurable intelligence?
English
57
2
54
3.3K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
First, relationship math is a horseshoe. The top of the left side are people that shotgunned it. Married on the day they met. Straight out of high school as high school sweethearts. People who meet and just know, and then do. This has a high chance of success because both are committed 💯 from the get go. And that’s exactly what a long term relationship requires. High chance of success. The top of the right side of the horseshoe are people who’ve basically been roommates with benefits for 10+ years. They know each other so well they are almost like family already. They might even be a bit bored with each other, but lives are attached and it’s working. Go to the courthouse and sign the papers to get your tax deduction. High chance of success. In the middle, with the lowest chance of success, are people who aren’t sure. Who hem and haw. Spend time poring over spreadsheets about it. Diddle and date a while. Move in with each other for a while. Finally pop the question, but then put off the wedding for a year because of… whatever excuse. To level set, even this middle area has a 55% chance of working out and becoming a successful long term relationship, and there are all kinds of people in this world to where some completely unimaginable to you or me shit can work. But all else equal (note I’m a statician/econometrician,) it’s better to be at either of the tops of the horseshoe, where your odds are upwards of 80%. If you’re on dating apps, and it means this much to you, put it right there in the bio. Fucking own it. If that’s a no from a chick, better to know now and not even waste a text message. Forget about dating games brother. Speak your truth to her, fast and hard. Bring it. What attracts women is: Decisive action. That’s it. (In particular, it’s knowing that in a pinch she can trust you to act quickly to protect, secure and maintain your personal empire, which if she believes you can, she will be attracted to you. Note to nerds: brains can work for this as well as brawn. Show her you can make decisions about things and act.) My advice is just tell her. Don’t waste anyone’s time.
English
0
0
1
35
RiverOaksGuy
RiverOaksGuy@Bowtiedplayer·
Dating question for you all, serious note. When would you bring up COVID and vaccination status? Some would say first or second date, and I don't think that's realistic at all and would make you sound like a sperg. This is a hardline for me though and it does need to come up at some point if me and her get more serious. I'm not looking for larp comments on this one. If you're a Roman statue profile pic account or if you're some weird trad Cath account, sit this one out. Serious answers only. The thing is, there are self-identified as conservative, registered Republican girls who nonetheless went ahead and got booster shots. That doesn't work for me. It also doesn't work for me the "oh but I changed my mind later and now see it was wrong blah blah", nah man. Pass. This is one of the qualms I had with NYC. There are some things anyone may need to compromise on a little bit if we're honest, but this isn't one of them. What would you do?
English
59
0
35
9.3K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@midwitstriver @eigenrobot I understand. Culture wars are your drug of choice. Switching from a bad obsessions to one that is actually good for you might be a better choice with better outcomes. Beware! Full disclosure: My advice comes from science. Try it at your own risk.
English
1
0
0
13
Pseud
Pseud@midwitstriver·
@econometricks @eigenrobot I’m not reading all that. Scientists said schools and workplaces and public parks should be closed while encouraging millions of people to protest George Floyd’s death due to drug overdose. That was the defining moment of loss of trust.
English
1
0
0
16
eigenrobot
eigenrobot@eigenrobot·
appeals to scientific authority have really fallen off lately did it just stop working politically?
English
127
13
784
19.4K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@Surferonx777 @DKThomp Subjective opinion & a favorite trope of Ayn Rand fans or FOX acolytes You can find evidence taxes incentivize positive outcomes You can do cross-country analysis to make broad, meaningful claims like: “The US government is the most efficient of any large country in the world”
English
0
0
0
5
Surfer_on_X
Surfer_on_X@Surferonx777·
@DKThomp We can't tax people because the taxes are spent unwisely and wastefully.
English
1
0
0
48
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
The emerging American tax logic right now is something like: - we can’t tax the poor because they’re poor - we can’t tax the working class because they work - we can’t tax tips bc that’s just unfair - we can’t tax businesses because they create work - we can’t tax property bc homeowners have it hard enough - we can’t tax billionaires because their contributions are so precious and also they might move or get mad or give your primary opponent $10m - and we can’t tax pensioners because they’ve “earned it.” It’s like the accommodative parenting style of politics. Every group is so very special it needs a tax jubilee. I guess that leaves … tariffs?
The White House@WhiteHouse

They earned it. They deserve it. NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY! The golden age for seniors' golden years. 🇺🇸

English
207
409
5.1K
1M
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
Straight Lines@econometricks

Thanks to Trump, FOX, right wing dominance in radio & podcasting plus social media ownership, “normies” in America don’t believe in: Science. Reading. Morality. Objective reality or truth. The USA runs entirely on vibes & narrative. Rarely do I post sources or stats on X anymore. At least 80% of users will tune you out immediately if you do unless it’s cherry picked to meet their narrative. X is rampant with malicious accounts that purport to be news, post actual facts and stats, but presented without proper context merely to force a narrative and invite rage. They believe that this is what the media has been doing to them for decades, and now they respond in kind. The difference, as in most things human, comes down to the intentions; the moral and ethical impetus behind the effort. If media really was, or if it felt, left wing coded to you all those years through the 80s, 90s, aughts & 10s, it was because you were falling for the long running psyop that the uber wealthy have been running since the 1950s. The time when “America Was Great” because we had encoded a good system that favored the middle class over the very wealthy and powerful. Being disciplined & determined, the uber wealthy hunkered down, created a plan, and dug in to the Republican Party where they recognized culture war leverage would be on their side. The gilded age of The Great Gatsby was finally behind us, with some lessons learned on both sides. If you’ve come to believe 💯 that: Corps > than people. Hoarding money = good. Worker’s rights = bad. Helping workers recover from economic calamity = bad! socialism! Social programs and wealth transfers are evil theft. Goverment & taxes = inefficiency & thievery. Rich = Productive. I could go on and on with these right wing libertarian “truths” that are mostly lies. If you fell for any of this, the Ayn Rand psyop worked on you. If you fell for Trump, not only did this psyop work on you, but so did the one many Americans thought we were well past and on the correct side of, having defeated it in a world war—a victory after which the world openly agreed to our hegemony because we were viewed as powerful, and, possibly, as good. The second psyop, so heavily reinforced by endless culture wars the elite made sure were pumped continuously to the Republican base, says: See that… [euphemistic—doesn’t matter who it is really, so pick whatever is in your head and I’ll dog whistle a few ideas to you to help you along] … “OTHER” over there? He’s trying to take YOUR cookie! (Do the meme in your head, where Trump sits at the head of a table with a giant pile of cookies in front of him, you sit on one side with a single cookie, and an angry looking “other” of your choice sits across from you. Maybe use my avatar here, frame me as a dirty, Palestine & trans in sports/libraries supporting liberal screaming at the universe for social justice.) I’m not woke at all, I’m conservative on some things like fiscal policy, I’m a socialist on others like medicine, I’m communist on a very few things like the military, but I’m mostly a free market capitalist when it comes to goods and services. I believe strongly that free market capitalism works, but its excesses have to be carefully monitored. We have to have rule of law, including laws that protect the people from predators, from anti-competitive practices, price manipulation (the main tool of modern day capitalists.) From bribing the refs. Corporations should be utterly banned from donating in politics. They can advertise, speak out and advocate, but they cannot directly spend a dime on a candidate, and they must loudly disclose that it is their voice that is speaking. Greed is good, but it isn’t great. When it goes looking for innovation, ideas, creative endeavors, it’s fabulous and generates enormous prosperity. When it goes looking for leverage, it becomes an insidious evil. Sorry, no “sources”. It’s all narrative & vibes. “DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH”. 🧐

QME
0
0
0
15
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
Straight Lines@econometricks

Thanks to Trump, FOX, right wing dominance in radio & podcasting plus social media ownership, “normies” in America don’t believe in: Science. Reading. Morality. Objective reality or truth. The USA runs entirely on vibes & narrative. Rarely do I post sources or stats on X anymore. At least 80% of users will tune you out immediately if you do unless it’s cherry picked to meet their narrative. X is rampant with malicious accounts that purport to be news, post actual facts and stats, but presented without proper context merely to force a narrative and invite rage. They believe that this is what the media has been doing to them for decades, and now they respond in kind. The difference, as in most things human, comes down to the intentions; the moral and ethical impetus behind the effort. If media really was, or if it felt, left wing coded to you all those years through the 80s, 90s, aughts & 10s, it was because you were falling for the long running psyop that the uber wealthy have been running since the 1950s. The time when “America Was Great” because we had encoded a good system that favored the middle class over the very wealthy and powerful. Being disciplined & determined, the uber wealthy hunkered down, created a plan, and dug in to the Republican Party where they recognized culture war leverage would be on their side. The gilded age of The Great Gatsby was finally behind us, with some lessons learned on both sides. If you’ve come to believe 💯 that: Corps > than people. Hoarding money = good. Worker’s rights = bad. Helping workers recover from economic calamity = bad! socialism! Social programs and wealth transfers are evil theft. Goverment & taxes = inefficiency & thievery. Rich = Productive. I could go on and on with these right wing libertarian “truths” that are mostly lies. If you fell for any of this, the Ayn Rand psyop worked on you. If you fell for Trump, not only did this psyop work on you, but so did the one many Americans thought we were well past and on the correct side of, having defeated it in a world war—a victory after which the world openly agreed to our hegemony because we were viewed as powerful, and, possibly, as good. The second psyop, so heavily reinforced by endless culture wars the elite made sure were pumped continuously to the Republican base, says: See that… [euphemistic—doesn’t matter who it is really, so pick whatever is in your head and I’ll dog whistle a few ideas to you to help you along] … “OTHER” over there? He’s trying to take YOUR cookie! (Do the meme in your head, where Trump sits at the head of a table with a giant pile of cookies in front of him, you sit on one side with a single cookie, and an angry looking “other” of your choice sits across from you. Maybe use my avatar here, frame me as a dirty, Palestine & trans in sports/libraries supporting liberal screaming at the universe for social justice.) I’m not woke at all, I’m conservative on some things like fiscal policy, I’m a socialist on others like medicine, I’m communist on a very few things like the military, but I’m mostly a free market capitalist when it comes to goods and services. I believe strongly that free market capitalism works, but its excesses have to be carefully monitored. We have to have rule of law, including laws that protect the people from predators, from anti-competitive practices, price manipulation (the main tool of modern day capitalists.) From bribing the refs. Corporations should be utterly banned from donating in politics. They can advertise, speak out and advocate, but they cannot directly spend a dime on a candidate, and they must loudly disclose that it is their voice that is speaking. Greed is good, but it isn’t great. When it goes looking for innovation, ideas, creative endeavors, it’s fabulous and generates enormous prosperity. When it goes looking for leverage, it becomes an insidious evil. Sorry, no “sources”. It’s all narrative & vibes. “DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH”. 🧐

QME
1
0
1
37
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
Straight Lines@econometricks

Thanks to Trump, FOX, right wing dominance in radio & podcasting plus social media ownership, “normies” in America don’t believe in: Science. Reading. Morality. Objective reality or truth. The USA runs entirely on vibes & narrative. Rarely do I post sources or stats on X anymore. At least 80% of users will tune you out immediately if you do unless it’s cherry picked to meet their narrative. X is rampant with malicious accounts that purport to be news, post actual facts and stats, but presented without proper context merely to force a narrative and invite rage. They believe that this is what the media has been doing to them for decades, and now they respond in kind. The difference, as in most things human, comes down to the intentions; the moral and ethical impetus behind the effort. If media really was, or if it felt, left wing coded to you all those years through the 80s, 90s, aughts & 10s, it was because you were falling for the long running psyop that the uber wealthy have been running since the 1950s. The time when “America Was Great” because we had encoded a good system that favored the middle class over the very wealthy and powerful. Being disciplined & determined, the uber wealthy hunkered down, created a plan, and dug in to the Republican Party where they recognized culture war leverage would be on their side. The gilded age of The Great Gatsby was finally behind us, with some lessons learned on both sides. If you’ve come to believe 💯 that: Corps > than people. Hoarding money = good. Worker’s rights = bad. Helping workers recover from economic calamity = bad! socialism! Social programs and wealth transfers are evil theft. Goverment & taxes = inefficiency & thievery. Rich = Productive. I could go on and on with these right wing libertarian “truths” that are mostly lies. If you fell for any of this, the Ayn Rand psyop worked on you. If you fell for Trump, not only did this psyop work on you, but so did the one many Americans thought we were well past and on the correct side of, having defeated it in a world war—a victory after which the world openly agreed to our hegemony because we were viewed as powerful, and, possibly, as good. The second psyop, so heavily reinforced by endless culture wars the elite made sure were pumped continuously to the Republican base, says: See that… [euphemistic—doesn’t matter who it is really, so pick whatever is in your head and I’ll dog whistle a few ideas to you to help you along] … “OTHER” over there? He’s trying to take YOUR cookie! (Do the meme in your head, where Trump sits at the head of a table with a giant pile of cookies in front of him, you sit on one side with a single cookie, and an angry looking “other” of your choice sits across from you. Maybe use my avatar here, frame me as a dirty, Palestine & trans in sports/libraries supporting liberal screaming at the universe for social justice.) I’m not woke at all, I’m conservative on some things like fiscal policy, I’m a socialist on others like medicine, I’m communist on a very few things like the military, but I’m mostly a free market capitalist when it comes to goods and services. I believe strongly that free market capitalism works, but its excesses have to be carefully monitored. We have to have rule of law, including laws that protect the people from predators, from anti-competitive practices, price manipulation (the main tool of modern day capitalists.) From bribing the refs. Corporations should be utterly banned from donating in politics. They can advertise, speak out and advocate, but they cannot directly spend a dime on a candidate, and they must loudly disclose that it is their voice that is speaking. Greed is good, but it isn’t great. When it goes looking for innovation, ideas, creative endeavors, it’s fabulous and generates enormous prosperity. When it goes looking for leverage, it becomes an insidious evil. Sorry, no “sources”. It’s all narrative & vibes. “DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH”. 🧐

QME
0
0
0
25
Caspius
Caspius@ItsCaspius·
@econometricks @eigenrobot No it's because "trust the science" from lefties while the did the most insane nonsensical shit because of "the science"
English
1
0
0
20
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@CQueenbeejdl @OurShallowState @xenn1al I very wrongly wrote him off in the 90s when I looked into him, figuring jail was an inevitable certainty for him once his money ran out. He’s an incredible escape artist.
English
1
0
3
17
The Shallow State
The Shallow State@OurShallowState·
Trump is unique among malignant narcissists in that he's of below average intelligence, inarticulate, and poorly read. Even non-political malignant narcissists (Ted Bundy) have very high IQ's. And all "cult of personality" malignant narcissists (Jim Jones) are literate and sharp.
English
51
407
1.7K
22.1K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
Thanks to Trump, FOX, right wing dominance in radio & podcasting plus social media ownership, “normies” in America don’t believe in: Science. Reading. Morality. Objective reality or truth. The USA runs entirely on vibes & narrative. Rarely do I post sources or stats on X anymore. At least 80% of users will tune you out immediately if you do unless it’s cherry picked to meet their narrative. X is rampant with malicious accounts that purport to be news, post actual facts and stats, but presented without proper context merely to force a narrative and invite rage. They believe that this is what the media has been doing to them for decades, and now they respond in kind. The difference, as in most things human, comes down to the intentions; the moral and ethical impetus behind the effort. If media really was, or if it felt, left wing coded to you all those years through the 80s, 90s, aughts & 10s, it was because you were falling for the long running psyop that the uber wealthy have been running since the 1950s. The time when “America Was Great” because we had encoded a good system that favored the middle class over the very wealthy and powerful. Being disciplined & determined, the uber wealthy hunkered down, created a plan, and dug in to the Republican Party where they recognized culture war leverage would be on their side. The gilded age of The Great Gatsby was finally behind us, with some lessons learned on both sides. If you’ve come to believe 💯 that: Corps > than people. Hoarding money = good. Worker’s rights = bad. Helping workers recover from economic calamity = bad! socialism! Social programs and wealth transfers are evil theft. Goverment & taxes = inefficiency & thievery. Rich = Productive. I could go on and on with these right wing libertarian “truths” that are mostly lies. If you fell for any of this, the Ayn Rand psyop worked on you. If you fell for Trump, not only did this psyop work on you, but so did the one many Americans thought we were well past and on the correct side of, having defeated it in a world war—a victory after which the world openly agreed to our hegemony because we were viewed as powerful, and, possibly, as good. The second psyop, so heavily reinforced by endless culture wars the elite made sure were pumped continuously to the Republican base, says: See that… [euphemistic—doesn’t matter who it is really, so pick whatever is in your head and I’ll dog whistle a few ideas to you to help you along] … “OTHER” over there? He’s trying to take YOUR cookie! (Do the meme in your head, where Trump sits at the head of a table with a giant pile of cookies in front of him, you sit on one side with a single cookie, and an angry looking “other” of your choice sits across from you. Maybe use my avatar here, frame me as a dirty, Palestine & trans in sports/libraries supporting liberal screaming at the universe for social justice.) I’m not woke at all, I’m conservative on some things like fiscal policy, I’m a socialist on others like medicine, I’m communist on a very few things like the military, but I’m mostly a free market capitalist when it comes to goods and services. I believe strongly that free market capitalism works, but its excesses have to be carefully monitored. We have to have rule of law, including laws that protect the people from predators, from anti-competitive practices, price manipulation (the main tool of modern day capitalists.) From bribing the refs. Corporations should be utterly banned from donating in politics. They can advertise, speak out and advocate, but they cannot directly spend a dime on a candidate, and they must loudly disclose that it is their voice that is speaking. Greed is good, but it isn’t great. When it goes looking for innovation, ideas, creative endeavors, it’s fabulous and generates enormous prosperity. When it goes looking for leverage, it becomes an insidious evil. Sorry, no “sources”. It’s all narrative & vibes. “DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH”. 🧐
Straight Lines tweet media
eigenrobot@eigenrobot

appeals to scientific authority have really fallen off lately did it just stop working politically?

English
0
0
4
153
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@Marbles329664 @EdLatimore I’ve lived a lot of places. I tell guys with complaints like this to just move to Utah. As far as I know, easiest place in America for a guy to find a wife and have a family if he’s a genuine guy. Mormon girls don’t require you to be Mormon, just serious and committed like them.
English
2
0
0
32
Marbles
Marbles@Marbles329664·
@econometricks @EdLatimore Girlboss lib chicks are often career focused and broke. It’s not a combo that leads to lots of kids
English
1
0
0
39
Ed Latimore
Ed Latimore@EdLatimore·
An interesting piece of data I just discovered: In the United States, political affiliation is one of the strongest predictors–if not THE strongest–of one's desire to have children. In fact, the top 10 states by birthrate are red (with 4 being over 2.00). The bottom 10 are all blue
English
2
3
36
4.5K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@JoyceCarolOates Love this old book on the subject. A thorough look at the myth of Tristan & Isult. Also recommend author’s books He & She. (The three are meant to go together.) a.co/d/00k5LMXQ
English
0
1
1
2.6K
Joyce Carol Oates
Joyce Carol Oates@JoyceCarolOates·
"falling in love" is a curious phenomenon in itself. in romantic comedies "falling in love" is presented as a kind of permanent condition akin to salvation; but we all know that, in real life, plenty of people "fall out of love" over time, in fact sometimes surprisingly quickly. a person deeply "in love" with her AI device in April 2026 may be totally detached from it in April 2027.
Wayne Shempner@GStandpipe

@JoyceCarolOates I don't know, I've heard of real people who met once or twice falling in love through written correspondence. Obviously not the same because they're both real and can potentially meet again, but it's a choice over those around them, and the process could probably be simulated.

English
6
6
132
34K
Straight Lines
Straight Lines@econometricks·
@trumpetadagreat @HistoryBoomer His X audience is above average IMO. This should land about 50/50 on the smarter thing and worse than that for him on the wealth thing. I’m sure I’m less smart & poorer. Figured you’d be right, but so far, maybe not! I may have done whatever the opposite of DK is.
English
0
0
1
34
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
I want to find out how I rank compared to my followers: Am I smarter than you? Am I richer than you?
English
24
1
12
2.3K