John Dreyer

@MakisMedicine @elonmusk I was scammed out of $500 for medication by one of these. Very convincing scam. They are preying on sick people.

BREAKING NEWS: X impersonators are out of control, @elonmusk you have to fix this! Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery but in this case, every imitation is an attack on cancer patients. People have no idea what I have to deal with behind the scenes, helping cancer patients with repurposed drugs like Ivermectin, so now you get a look behind the curtain here. Every single one of these 325+ accounts stole my photos and attempted to defraud cancer patients. Every. single. one. I only show you the last 3 months. I have to report EVERY SINGLE ONE manually. That's a lot of time and that's a broken system, Elon. There needs to be be a limit on this kind of Big Pharma fraud. If anyone hits 10 imitators let's say, no one can be allowed to create any account with any variation of my name. Please fix this.

@SteveOnSpeed You should have worked out the cost of the windows, added 10% and countered. most will say yes

We had Renewal By Anderson out at the house last year to give us a quote for 11 windows and a sliding glass door. $35,000. How do these guys stay in business?

So why is it that it rains & rains (&rains) in British Columbia - and then in May there are water restrictions?

@SOUJIJP The Babelfish unites us all.....

イーロンマスクの歴史的決断によって、日米のオールドメディアが、存在価値を失うかも知れない。日本と米国、英語圏の人たちの直接的な対話が促進され、メディアが隠していた情報も共有されることになり、メディアによる報道も世論操作も意味を持たなくなるかもしれない。シンギュラリティの始まりである。

I would recommend that people put these screen shots into AI and ask if it was the standard therapies (chemo/surgery/radiotherapy) that was effective for the particular cancer or Dr Makis's treatment. The results indicate the standard treatment protocol is doing the heavy lifting.

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and FENBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 62 year old woman in MOROCCO with Stage 4 Lung Cancer to bones reports after 1.5 months: CANCER FREE!! Ivermectin Cancer Revolution has made it to MOROCCO! 🇲🇦 😃 Do you think Big Pharma has any assets in Morocco to stop it? I doubt it. 😉 STORY: 62 year old woman in MOROCCO with Stage 4 Lung Cancer to bones (oligometastatic recurrence) In January 2026 she started Ivermectin and Fenbendazole Result after 1.5 months: Complete Metabolic Response (CANCER FREE) 🙏 Yes, cancer patients in Morocco using repurposed drugs are doing better than Mayo clinic and MD Anderson combined! 😃 I have helped over 9000 Cancer patients with Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole in the largest repurposed drug Research Project in history. Every cancer patient should be on my sub.stack, check my X bio for details! God bless...🙏

@tyromper They both look great!

I 100% notice this & agree with it too! My folks are about to turn 69. (Go ahead & laugh teenagers :) My mom was diagnosed with cancer over a decade ago & was offered CUPCAKES before her chemo. The Dr. actually said "SUGAR was good medicine." After that she's been fanatical about basically going the opposite of everything mainstream health "experts" suggest. 10 years in remission. Runs & lifts daily. Super healthy. My dad REFUSED the Covid jab. Got heated & when the Dr. told him "at your age this is foolish!" My dad said, "I don't take health advice from a guy 30 years younger than me than can't do as many pushups as I can!" He ignores almost all mainstream advice & has done the opposite of what the "experts" recommend. He lifts, runs, & bikes daily. He's been logging runs for 4 decades & is about to go over 100,000 miles run! It's good to always ask questions. It's wise to stay true to what your convictions are & not waver.

@WretchedJalopy @MakisMedicine does anyone know if this email is legit: info.makis79@yahoo.com

Diagnosed with stage 4 cancer in June 2025, my life expectancy was around five months. As of March 2026 I’m CANCER FREE, thanks to @MakisMedicine. Happy to share what I’ve learned. Here’s some publicly available info on Dr Makis’s generic protocols: truthforthesoul.com/wp-content/upl…

@steeletalk Fill up quick before it is $4

Gas is $2.14 a litre in Vancouver today. 😩

@DimaZeniuk @genna_hammer amazing - a glimpse of the future and the hope for humanity

SpaceX Starship rocket garden

@rationalaussie > The US needs 500,000 new electricians this decade. Within a decade there will be 500k electrician robots who can learn the whole of the trade instantly and have completely dexterous hands and bodies. In their spare time they can cut the grass and take care of your parents..

The bigger question here - and the real problem - is why does it take 5 years to become an electrician? You're seriously gonna tell me the smartest white collar workers (soon to be unemployed) are effectively prohibited from getting employed as a lucrative tradesperson during the final period where human employment even matters, because of regulations? It's insane. A smart person could turbo charge this in 6 months. The West needs fast-track trades programs.

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

The Real Reason Why Europe Won't Fight: It's Not About the War When the EU's foreign policy chief declared that the conflict in the Middle East was not Europe's war, she was not making a strategic assessment. She was making a domestic one. The Strait of Hormuz carries a fifth of the world's energy supplies. Daily Gulf oil exports have collapsed by sixty per cent in a fortnight. Germany is facing an energy price shock. Rachel Reeves is watching her fiscal headroom evaporate in real time. France is warning of inflation. These are not countries for whom Middle Eastern stability is an abstract concern. They are countries whose economies depend on that shipping lane remaining open. The idea that protecting it is not their war is not a foreign policy position. It is a fiction maintained for a domestic audience. The domestic audience in question is not hard to identify. Every government that has refused Trump's request shares the same political constraint. Germany has over five million residents of Muslim background. France has the largest Muslim population in Western Europe. Britain has communities whose political representatives spent the past fortnight marching under Khamenei's portrait toward Downing Street. The calculation being made in London, Berlin and Brussels is not about international law or strategic prudence. It is about which communities those governments cannot afford to antagonise and what those communities might do if they felt their governments had taken the wrong side. Not our war means not on our streets. The foreign policy is being written by the demographics. Trump named it with characteristic bluntness. "Britain used to be the Rolls-Royce of allies", he said. Then he described his phone call with Starmer, in which the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom told the President of the United States that he needed to consult his team before deciding whether to send minesweepers. Minesweepers. Not troops. Not bombers. Not a declaration of war. Minesweepers to keep open a shipping lane that Britain's own economy depends on. Trump's response was precise: you don't need to meet with your team. You're the Prime Minister. You can make up your own mind. That exchange tells you everything about the state of British leadership that a thousand opinion columns cannot. The humanitarian statement on Lebanon follows the same logic. Britain, Canada, France, Germany and Italy issued a joint warning to Israel about its ground operations against Hezbollah, the Iranian proxy that has spent decades arming itself to destroy the Jewish state and that attacked Israel the moment Khamenei was killed. The statement called for immediate de-escalation. It described the humanitarian situation as deeply alarming. It said a significant ground offensive must be averted. Not one word about the organisation that started the war, built the tunnels, fired the rockets and continues to operate with Iranian funding and Iranian weapons. The language of humanitarianism is being applied selectively, and the selection follows the same demographic logic as everything else. This is the pattern that has defined the Western European response to this entire crisis. Not principle. Not strategy. Not law. A set of Left-wing governments that have spent twenty-five years building electoral coalitions that now constrain their ability to act in their own national interest. They cannot send ships because of who lives in their cities. They cannot back Israel because of who votes in their constituencies. They cannot name Hezbollah as the aggressor because of who marches in their streets. The Strait of Hormuz is closing and the Rolls-Royce of allies needs to consult its team. This is what the long march through the institutions has produced. Not our war. Just our problem. "Trump's response was precise: you don't need to meet with your team. You're the Prime Minister. You can make up your own mind."

The transition from UBI to UHI is a race. Can the deflationary wave arrive before the social fracture becomes irreparable? Can we create Abundance (collapse the cost of basic needs) before the valley of desperation destabilizes the political conditions for the transition to complete? Call for brilliant ideas... Soon.

@chamath @saylor As would your Fiat bank account.....

@saylor BTC would need to be quantum resistant by then

This is genius A video was made in the style of Disney that explains Sharia Law This makes Islam and Sharia Law easy to understand for everyone of all ages

Karl Marx gave humanity its most murderous idea: that human suffering stems not from scarcity and the human condition, but from private property itself. This bearded parasite—who never worked a day in his life and lived off Engels' textile fortune—convinced generations that voluntary exchange was exploitation while violent redistribution was justice. The body count speaks for itself. Stalin's forced collectivization murdered 6 million Ukrainians through engineered famine. Mao's Great Leap Forward killed 45 million through sheer economic illiteracy. Pol Pot slaughtered a quarter of Cambodia's population. And every single time, the intellectuals proclaimed it "wasn't real socialism." The pattern is identical across continents and centuries: seize private property, centrally plan production, watch millions starve. But the intellectual foundation was always rotten. Marx's labor theory of value—the notion that labor alone creates value—was already debunked by Austrian economists like Böhm-Bawerk before the ink was dry on Das Kapital. Value is subjective, determined by individual preferences in voluntary exchange. Marx simply couldn't grasp that the capitalist performs the crucial function of time preference—sacrificing present consumption for uncertain future returns. Even "democratic socialism" in Western Europe required massive wealth transfers from productive individuals to bureaucratic parasites, creating permanent dependency classes and stagnating growth. Venezuela had the world's largest oil reserves and still managed to create toilet paper shortages. Cuba turned a Caribbean paradise into a floating prison where doctors flee on rafts. Every socialist experiment ends the same way: empty shelves, secret police, and intellectuals explaining why the next attempt will be different.

Giant #Bitcoin drone show in Switzerland showing BTC eating fiat currencies like Pac-Man 🇨🇭

@CHEK_News $24m is the quote now. By the time it is finished it will be $40m for 1200 people. Put Starlink in every home for <$2m. Elon would probably do a deal to help out....

The British Columbia government is spending up to $24 million for the construction of a new subsea fibre-optic cable to Haida Gwaii in a bid to improve the islands' internet access. cheknews.ca/b-c-to-build-u…

⚡️This one matters. Here is what I see. The real endgame danger of AI is regime omniscience. The real nightmare is a state that can see everything, model everything, predict everything, and intervene everywhere before human resistance can even coherently form. Because every state, once given a tool that increases legibility and control, will use it. That is the real answer. Government is the most dangerous vessel for AI because government is the one entity that can combine data, law, police power, military power, financial surveillance, and narrative management under one roof. A corporation can profile you. A government can profile you and then freeze your bank account, flag your travel, audit you, deplatform you, deny your permits, arrest you, or simply make normal life impossible. That is the difference. And the deeper truth is even worse than “government with AI.” It will be government fused with corporations that build the stack. The state gets the mandate. The vendors get the cognition layer. The public gets managed. So people keep imagining the danger as Terminator or some rogue superintelligence deciding to wipe out humanity. That is child-level sci-fi. The real thing looks administrative. Risk scoring. Predictive policing. Behavioral monitoring. Automated censorship. Autonomous border enforcement. Financial pattern detection. Social graph mapping. Drone-enabled suppression. Emotion recognition. Pre-crime logic dressed up as public safety. That is the actual path. And once those systems exist, they will not stay limited to “bad guys.” They never do. The category expands. First terrorists. Then extremists. Then misinformation spreaders. Then destabilizers. Then suspicious financial actors. Then politically inconvenient people. Then anyone outside the preferred compliance envelope. That is always how power works.

@BorisJohnson Pure Energy Baby

I've long suspected Bitcoin is a giant Ponzi scheme and now I'm hearing tales of woe that make me fear I'm right. mol.im/a/15643681