flaptweetflap7

@baseballcrank Maybe the time to stop playing the “both sides” game is when democrats have embraced actual Nazi candidates and this is how their supporters treat “reasonable, principled conservatives” who dislike Trump’s lack of strict adherence to conservative principles. Food for thought

I mean, if in this hypothetical I & other conservatives had been criticizing Democrats for years for using helicopters to dispose of political opponents, sure.

@yhdistyminen @politicalmath @feelsdesperate @xwanyex look the “reasonable technocratic libs” are running cover for domestic terrorism again They’re just such decent heckin people am I right?

@politicalmath The current President of the United States does this shit all the time.

This is legitimately psychotic. These are very bad people and they would be cast out of any decent society.

@mazemoore Massie has also called the Trump administration the “Epstein administration” “BuT hE diDnT cAlL tRuMp A pEdO” These bad faith grifters do the same willful obtuseness/refusing to understand things act we are all too familiar with when dealing with leftists

I was at the beach today with the family. Just got home. But I'm so glad you posted this. Appreciate the fact check. Let's see how much you really care about facts. Firstly, I posted something that no video evidence exists to confirm. Massie has not explicitly said that Trump is a pedophile on video. He may have said it, but there's not video evidence of it, therefore, I shouldn't have worded the post that way. I was careless with my words. I was wrong. You are right. What I should have posted was "Thomas Massie has spent the past nine months insinuating that Trump is either a pedophile or perfectly fine with pedophilia." That would have accurate. That being said, here's a couple questions for you. Thomas Massie has made a bunch of statements that aren't provable, just like mine. There's no evidence to support most of his claims. Did his statements upset you as much as my post did? Are you fact checking or are you protecting Thomas Massie? Massie told the world that he had uncovered 6 men who were co-conspirators of Epstein. He and Khanna read the names. It was all false. He falsely accused men and defamed them. That must have bothered you a ton right? I haven't checked but surely you posted about that since you are strongly against anything untrue. Massie has repeatedly claimed that there are 20 men who are guilty of raping children, men who have never been investigated before (think about that, how does he know they are guilty), men who Trump's DOJ is protecting. He keeps saying that Trump's DOJ is covering up for these 20 men. That's been his central claim for almost a year now but he hasn't provided any evidence to support this claim. It's baseless but he keeps saying it. Surely you have called him out for making that claim with no evidence, right? You must have. Massie has claimed that Pam Bondi was instructed to cover up for men guilty of raping children. Terrible accusation but he has stated this as fact. Massie doesn't say "I think." He says "I'm know" that someone instructed Bondi to cover up for a bunch of men who are guilty of raping children. One could infer that the person instructing Bondi to cover up for these men is Trump. Has Massie provided evidence to support this claim? If he hasn't, have you called him out? If you called me out I'm sure you called Massie out. 👌 Massie has claimed that Trump is protecting pedophiles. Many times. Is that a fact? Has Massie provided evidence to support this claim? He spent nine months on MSNOW and CNN making this claim. If he hasn't provided evidence to support that claim, it must really bother you since it's all about truth. Massie has claimed that the people funding his opponent right now are criminally implicated in the Epstein files and are trying to get him out of office to prevent him from exposing them. Is there evidence of that claim? Standards right? Massie has said that Trump's friends are pedophiles. Any proof of that? He says that Trump is part of the "Epstein class." He defines the Epstein class as a bunch of rich and powerful men who abused women and girls and who have never been held accountable. Yeah, he never said the words "Trump is a pedophile." Any idea what he is implying there? Is there any evidence to support that claim that Trump's friends are pedophiles? Which friends? Words matter right? I could go on and on. You are so correct, I chose my words poorly. You got me. I'm actually going to delete my post but I can't wait for your exposé on all the unprovable, baseless claims that Thomas Massie has made over the past year. After all, it's all about truth right? 😜

@wil_da_beast630 @CBHeresy Did he challenge him to a fight or sucker punch him? You keep acting like fighting words are active legal doctrine. The racism is a non-factor, this will be a standard self defense case Chud will likely be found guilty, but not for the reasons you outline. Discrediting stuff

A big part of this, as with woke, is the manipulative use of language. So, "murder us," at first, makes no sense in this case. CHUD fired a shot and got charged with murder/attempt, after his opponent challenged him to a regular fight. But, you have to realize, these guys will argue something like: "Every single Black person will try to stomp you to death in every single fight - so that WAS attempted murder!" That's total nonsense - if you dig into agg assault cases, the rate of this seems to be about 1% for Black guys and .3% for Caucasians - but that's where the argument comes from. You end up with: "If white people are not allowed to unprovokedly scream racial and family insults at minorities and shoot anyone who responds with a shove, niggers will murder us (i.e., initiate fights)!!!" I find the assumption that white crews of 1-3 guys, plus a camera-man, will never WIN these fights interesting and telling, btw. On and on. You're starting to see parallel myth-making processes ("Israel pays people $7k per tweet") on left and hard right.

“Blacks can murder us an over a word” They can’t. And saying it is as retarded as when Black people said “Whites can murder us for walking and eating skittles at night” during the George Zimmerman trial.

@Noahpinion @wil_da_beast630 Yup. Maybe it’s just demographics of where we live respectively, but if your sample size is large, neither of these are remotely rare categories x.com/flaptweetflap7…

@wil_da_beast630 Bruh I have

I've never met an Asian bum or a Black incel.

@wil_da_beast630 Go to a super smash bros tournament and get back to me. You will find ample examples of both When the online racists get under your skin the quality of your posts drops dramatically into the type of slop you rightfully criticize!

@redsteeze *tap tap* x.com/flaptweetflap7…

Good stuff dude. The Bulwark.

@bonchieredstate We’re all seemingly supposed to be ignorant of the fact that good behavior while incarcerated typically results in serving 50% of the sentence, which she already did

Look at Kaitlin foaming at the mouth over a 70 year old, non-violent woman being let out after spending over four years in prison. These are the same people who won’t say a word about the disastrous effects of bail “reform” in left-wing cities.

@xwanyex I notice the “travel” discourse is centered around going to hotels, trying new restaurants, paying for entertainment etc Not much about week long back country camping/hunting/fishing excursions with a $5 per day land usage fee Foreign shopping malls are masculine now I guess

@feelsdesperate But she made it herself hurrr durrrrr. Groundbreaking commentary from Alice as always x.com/flaptweetflap7…

‘Smart, reasonable centrists’ are trying to insult Trump with fake photos and epithets that were edgy in 2016. Totally embarrassing. These people are ignorable and have been totally left behind and like Hanania they’re reduced to desperately acting out for attention.

@AliceFromQueens @ShineboxHukster “Look Trump is subservient to china” “What do you think of China?” “I’m not hawkish at all, kinda pro China and anti-Taiwan” Literally beyond parody. You are shameless

@CathyYoung63 @avidseries Cathy we get you want to defend Islamic rapists. How else would you keep getting your paycheck at the Bulwark you evil harpie? Tell your boss he’s an antisemite. You’re a kapo

@avidseries Grok just told me the tongue-nailing allegation could not be verified. grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

@wil_da_beast630 You may disagree with current precedent and think it’s immoral, dishonorable, etc (and that is certainly a reasonable pov, iirc you are a fan of bringing back duels lol). But let’s call a spade a spade, the guy’s words posed no imminent threat. Ergo standard self defense case

@wil_da_beast630 I mean not really, he’s clearly a scumbag and the open question (to which he will probably lose) is whether it was a reasonable use of force You seem to be under the impression though that fighting words are live doctrine… fighting words are effectively dead doctrine

A surprising lot of people want to defend the right of various online streamers to walk up to a total stranger, start violently screaming slurs about his race and/or mother, not be touched in any way....and then cry like a bitch and shoot the guy if he initiates a fight.

@TheBrancaShow @misfitpatriot_ I think his team’s best line of defense will be the same argument used by police officers. If he was incapacitated by a punch, his firearm could be taken by the assailant, thereby elevating the punch to an imminent threat of life

@misfitpatriot_ That was NOT my legal conclusion. Chud MIGHT be f'd. It depends on how the facts develop.

I hate sharing a Myron clip where I’m not calling him a retard, but this lawyer actually breaks down the self defense argument pretty well so it’s worth a listen. If you don’t wanna watch it, I’ll summarize: Chuds fucked…

@Jason_Cooper938 @Elarbolpine @MariGO2thepolls @adonipriapus (But your willingness to concede that point does not absolve her graphic of the glaring methodological flaws)

@Jason_Cooper938 @Elarbolpine @MariGO2thepolls @adonipriapus Not one of them whatsoever lmao but I do appreciate the intellectual consistency on your part. You are different from Mar G-O in that respect. I’m a big proponent of ending all SS, Medicare, Medicaid, and means tested welfare, so those terms are acceptable to me

Rural Appalachian: I hate urban libs and I hope they die Urban liberals: another trillion to rural Appalachians. They are just misunderstood Suburban conservatives: fuck I don’t wanna hang out with rural Appalachian this sucks. Maybe if we elect Trump Urban libs will have to invite me to parties

@CoreyWriting Counterpoint: this is the same justification Hamas supporters give. Terrorism is bad and did not lead to the abolition of slavery (he was condemned by Lincoln). It would be far more legitimate to attack state officials and try to overthrow the government during that period

Counterpoint: John Brown and abolitionists were entirely justified.

@CBHeresy I would just stop fighting the slur point. He may well be guilty, but it won’t be because of the slurs x.com/flaptweetflap7…

Not all slurs carry equal weight, and even the same sentence can vary in offensiveness based on context. For example, saying “nice ass, baby” will get you a smile when speaking to a stripper at a club, but will get you your ass kicked if said to a man’s 9 year old daughter.

@ASFleischman @wil_da_beast630 Waiting for more camera angles to come out (and I suspect they will since the window video does not capture the whole incident. But largely agree x.com/flaptweetflap7…

@wil_da_beast630 I think his best case scenario is: 1. The guy was looking for him 2. The guy started kicking his ass or was armed 3. It was only at that point that he fired. If those things are true, he could have a decent self-defense claim. But I don't think they are right now.

No shock here. Takes?