Gentry Underwood

5.7K posts

Gentry Underwood banner
Gentry Underwood

Gentry Underwood

@gentry

Design is conscious evolution. Cofounder @mailbox (→dropbox), @bringatrailer (→hearst media), and @playdotspace (→google).

🌎 Katılım Ocak 2007
612 Takip Edilen6.7K Takipçiler
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
guys you’ll never believe where I found the fountain of youth
English
1.3K
130
6K
1.8M
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Bobby Sauce
Bobby Sauce@takenaps·
People trying to dog @RepThomasMassie for one woman's accusations while completely ignoring and dismissing the dozens if not hundreds of Epstein victims who have documented cases of horrible abuse is absolutely priceless. You people are fake as fuck
English
58
186
1.2K
11.5K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
gabriel
gabriel@gabriel1·
when i voice prompt, i yap for 10 minutes straight and change my mind 3 times in the middle of the yap, and send it without reading yap enough tokens for the picture to be complete, it understands well when you change your mind in the middle. ai is smarter than you think
Alex@dev_alexandrum

i feel like i don’t think linearly enough for speech to text prompting. i frequently change wording as i write so the pressure of having to voice the right prompt first try is frustrating

English
72
55
1.8K
114K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Institute of Art and Ideas
Are mysticism and spirituality in conflict with science? Transhumanist philosopher David Pearce @webmasterdave describes how despite his lack of religious or spiritual beliefs, he has still found himself able to access what he sees as a higher state of consciousness. He proposes that future scientific discoveries won’t necessarily be in conflict with spiritual experiences, but could in fact contribute towards them. In this debate, Pearce joins Naomi Goulder and Rupert Sheldrake to debate mysticism and modernity. Tap to watch more. iai.tv/video/mysticis…
English
11
15
69
6.7K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Kacper Piotr Kaminski
Kacper Piotr Kaminski@Kacper_PK_CH·
Stanley Druckenmiller: "So, I’ll never forget it. January of 2000 I go into Soros’s office and I say I’m selling all the tech stocks, selling everything. This is crazy…at 104 times earnings. This is nuts. Just kind of as I explained earlier, we’re going to step aside, wait for the next fat pitch. I didn’t fire the two gunslingers. They didn’t have enough money to really hurt the fund, but they started making 3 percent a day and I’m out. It is driving me nuts. I mean their little account is like up 50 percent on the year. I think Quantum was up seven. It’s just sitting there. So like around March I could feel it coming. I just, I had to play. I couldn’t help myself. And three times the same week I pick up a, don’t do it. Don’t do it. Anyway, I pick up the phone finally. I think I missed the top by an hour. I bought $6 billion worth of tech stocks, and in six weeks I had left Soros and I had lost $3 billion in that one play. You asked me what I learned. I didn’t learn anything. I already knew that I wasn’t supposed to do that. I was just an emotional basket case and couldn’t help myself. So, maybe I learned not to do it again, but I already knew that."
English
50
252
3.1K
439.8K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
signüll
signüll@signulll·
the future interface is probably three layers: 1. ambient intent capture voice, location, calendar, screen context, messages, habits, biometrics, etc. the system understands what you’re trying to do before you explicitly “open” anything or augments your intent deeply. 2. agentic execution the actual work happens through agents operating software, apis, browsers, documents, email, calendars, workflows, payments, support systems, whatever. most “computer use” becomes machine to machine clerical labor. 3. ephemeral verification ux humans still need to inspect, compare, approve, edit, reject, or enjoy things. that’s where gui survives but as disposable, task specific surfaces generated for the moment.
English
130
200
2K
132.1K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
David Deutsch
David Deutsch@DavidDeutschOxf·
@waitbutwhy The fact that this question elicits different answers depending on how the issue is 'illustrated' is no reflection on the victims who answer, but on the emptiness of scientism as a mode of analysis of human decisions.
English
17
11
537
31.5K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky@stevesi·
Not going to tire of sharing this. Written right at the dawn of business computers at every desk just before the internet. The world thought computers didn't help productivity and the economy stalled --> no more jobs.
Steven Sinofsky tweet media
Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APompliano

I have changed my mind on how AI will impact jobs in America. Previously, I believed AI would replace many entry level roles typically filled by young employees. The technology would then work its way up the organization and eventually reduce the total number of jobs in a company. The data is saying something different, so when I get new information I am willing to change my mind. The number of software engineers being hired has been increasing. The number of open software engineer roles is growing. The number of new college grads who get hired has increased 5.6% over the last 12 months. The unemployment level for people aged 20-24 years old who have a college degree has fallen from nearly 9% to almost 5% as well. The Wall Street Journal recently wrote “AI created 640,000 jobs between 2023 and 2025 in the U.S., according to an analysis by LinkedIn of job posting data, including new white-collar positions such as Head of AI and AI engineer.” And I am starting to see companies throughout our portfolio aggressively hiring to keep up with the demand for their products and services. If AI can make employees more productive, which is widely accepted as fact, then companies are going to want as many productive units of labor as possible. This is a key reason why I am changing my mind. AI appears to be a magical technology that will make companies more productive and more profitable. The net result will be more corporations, more startups, and more jobs. All three are big, positive wins for the American economy.

English
12
23
160
45K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
cinesthetic.
cinesthetic.@TheCinesthetic·
Miles Davis composed the Elevator to the Gallows (1958) score in a single session while watching the film. After noting a rough cut, he gathered 4 musicians without rehearsal & recorded it in one take, creating a landmark in improvised film scoring.
English
42
725
3.3K
165.9K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Adam Mockler
Adam Mockler@adammocklerr·
Tucker Carlson is not our friend. He should not be welcome into civilized society as if he did nothing wrong. We can happily watch the MAGA movement self-destruct without mistaking Tucker as a good person. In 2021, while still at Fox News, Tucker Carlson privately texted about how much he hated Trump. Private texts also revealed that he knew the 2020 election was not stolen from Trump. Tucker would then go on air and say the exact opposite to 10s of millions of Americans: that Trump was the best president ever and that Dominion voting machines were totally rigged. He intentionally told destructive lies to Americans en masse for career gain & profit. He would do the exact same today, just from a different angle. Tucker Carlson helped mainstream the Great Replacement Theory by planting the seeds into millions of Americans heads on primetime Fox News. Tucker Carlson doesn't genuinely care about human rights, or the 'sanctity of Islam'. Remember, the enemy of your enemy is not ALWAYS your friend...
Adam Mockler tweet mediaAdam Mockler tweet media
English
577
4K
16.5K
670.4K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
It’s remarkable how often you need to be dramatically upgrading your AI architecture given the pace of progress in AI models right now. If you’re building agents, you basically need to throw away large parts of previous work that you setup to compensate for model limitations every few quarters. The systems you built to mitigate context window limits aren’t useful anymore, and for many use-cases it’s easier just to throw more compute at a problem today in ways that wouldn’t have worked previously. If you’re deploying agents in a workflow, you likely need to equally be rethinking your core systems at about that same frequency. The way you would deploy agents in an enterprise 18 months ago is entirely different from the best practices that you’d have today. This is partly why everyone’s working so hard right now. Right as a best practice is solidified, models improve dramatically, and that old work is rendered obsolete. Unclear that this lets up anytime soon, which is why the it pays to be so wired in right now.
Sam Hogan 🇺🇸@samhogan

most of tooling around llms was built for a world that largely doesn’t exist anymore RAG, GraphRAG, Multi Agent Orchestration, ReAct frameworks, prompt management/versioning tools, LLMOps tooling, eval tools, gateways, finetuning libs, etc all obsoleted in in the last 3 months

English
99
106
976
242.8K
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Turnbull
Turnbull@cturnbull1968·
This may turn out to be the biggest stock market manipulation in American history.
OSINTtechnical@Osinttechnical

@MarineTraffic Mass turn around, nearly every ship attempting the crossing has turned back.

English
407
7K
43.7K
2.6M
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Aron Fromm
Aron Fromm@aronfromm·
A little short I made about Norm.
English
677
5.7K
34.4K
2.6M
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Zane Koch
Zane Koch@zanehkoch·
ok actually insane paper published yesterday a research group in Korea built a gene switch you can control wirelessly using electromagnetic fields they exposed mice to 60 hz EMF (same frequency as your wall outlet) using a pair of large coils that generate a uniform magnetic field around the animal, for cyclic 3-day on / 4-day off pulses they showed this could: - activate OSK to do epigenetic reprogramming in progeroid and aged mice, extending lifespan and reversing aging markers across multiple tissues - conditionally switch on mutant amyloid genes only in aged mouse brains, letting them separate aging effects from amyloid effects to study AD biology in a way previous models couldn't no drugs, no impacts, just a magnetic field from outside the body
Zane Koch tweet media
English
273
885
7.2K
2.3M
Gentry Underwood retweetledi
Taylor Sterling
Taylor Sterling@FatherMcKennaa·
RIP Terence McKenna you would have loved DMT Pens & vibe coding Timewave Zero
English
36
127
932
44K