Miguel Ángel Abellanas

233 posts

Miguel Ángel Abellanas banner
Miguel Ángel Abellanas

Miguel Ángel Abellanas

@maabellanas

Brain-Immune Axis / Assistant Professor @unav / Former postdoc at Michal Schwartz's @WeizmannScience / Passionately loving the world / Hopefully optimistic

Pamplona, Spain Katılım Ağustos 2021
523 Takip Edilen135 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Miguel Ángel Abellanas
Miguel Ángel Abellanas@maabellanas·
I’m very happy to share the preprint of one of the projects I’ve been working on during my postdoc in Michal Schwartz’s lab at the @WeizmannScience 🧠 Alzheimer’s disease disrupts bone marrow myelopoiesis, leading to systemic immune dysfunction. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
English
2
15
43
3.8K
Miguel Ángel Abellanas retweetledi
Oded Rechavi
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi·
Important announcement!!!🫵💥💫 Would you have a tooth pulled if it helped your chances to get an important grant funded? Absurd question (obviously), but the situation right now is so bad funding-wise, that I bet some of you actually considered it for a second… Well, don’t get desperate - we created a new tool that might help! (keep your teeth!) I’m excited to announce that as of today we are officially releasing “QED for Grants” for everyone. What started off as an extension of our existing paper review platform, grew in the last few months to an entirely new design. We’ve been working like crazy on this, and although we have more things we want to add in the (very near) future, we decided to release our AI for grants NOW, earlier than planned. It’s not perfect, no AI is, but for the first time, when I run my own grants through @qedscience, I feel it gets the research, finds real problems, and gives me very useful feedback that I can implement before submission. It’s like sending it to 20 scientists from my domain, knowing they’ll agree to dedicate their entire week to carefully read and comment on every line. It’s very important to write your own grants yourself, it makes you think hard and you learn a lot from doing it, and q.e.d’s system is designed to preserve these positive aspects and augment them - you get feedback on your own writing, we don’t write for you!! But at the same time, a typical PI spends many months every year writing proposals and sadly only a tiny fraction gets funded, even if the ideas are good. When you are forced to submit an unreasonable amount of grants the quality of the writing drops, and rejection rates increase. Not because the essence is bad. It’s simply too competitive right now (the cuts made it so much worse) and if your proposal is not super clear and tight, and if it’s not a perfect fit for the grant you’re submitting, you’re doomed. Our grant solution is not an authoring, text-generating tool. It gives you constructive feedback on your writing (it comments on the deep things, not grammar and typos). It’s meant to help you with the questions that torment you late at night (“is this a good fit?”, “Is this novel enough?”, “Did I miss something?”). Tens of thousands of you already use q.e.d to improve your manuscripts and critically read papers, we built the grant tool by the same principles (you’ll identify many of the features that you told us you like). We’ve processed thousands of proposals, learned where things fail, where reviewers get stuck, why good ideas come out weak. We interviewed hundreds of scientists, and also experts who work in funding agencies and university research authorities, and implemented their feedback (we’re constantly looking for more feedback). Our AI is always happy to give you constructive (and polite!) critique, and it will go through your grant line-by-line, forcing you to improve clarity, flag weak points, and push the whole thing to a higher standard. We study, in scale, what gets funded and what doesn’t, and what is the perfect fit for each type of grant. So please, use it, pressure-test it, tell us where it fails, and together we’ll improve it every day to put you in the best position for actually testing your ideas in the real world. As always with q.e.d, the system is completely secured and private, and we are NOT training on your data (see the FAQ on our website). Please like, retweet, and share with your favorite colleagues! (link to the platform below in the thread👇)
English
13
53
179
47.8K
Amy Fan
Amy Fan@amycfanphd·
@maabellanas @RukmanThota @MaxKrummel @Nature @immunox @UCSF LOVE brain macrophages. Was super inspired by synaptic pruning and am curious what macrophages are doing with the material that they acquire from neurons (in the brain and potentially elsewhere?). I can imagine a world where developmental stage, tissue, etc. all play a role.
English
1
0
2
58
Miguel Ángel Abellanas retweetledi
Oded Rechavi
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi·
Announced by the ERC today (really bad news for science!!! It starts in Europe but will affect everybody) Because the REVIEWING LOAD is so bad, if your application fails you may need to wait mulitple years (>3?!?) until you can submit again! The ERC is the lifeline of the leading labs in Europe, so many research programs will be terminated (just no other sources to compensate). The letter from the ERC says “the only way is to reduce applications” (highlighted in the picture below) No!!! It's the wrong direction. Use AI to assist review. It’s not perfect (yet), but it allows more proposals to be evaluated, and it could support, not replace, human reviewers.
Oded Rechavi tweet media
English
55
134
463
120.7K
Claire Bedbrook
Claire Bedbrook@clairebedbrook·
Aging may feel gradual… but what if it’s not? In our paper out today, we tracked fish continuously from puberty until death. This gave us a unique view of how aging unfolds across the adult lifespan. 🧵
English
22
147
556
71K
Miguel Ángel Abellanas
Miguel Ángel Abellanas@maabellanas·
Isaiah 9:4–6 Tonight my heart returns to the Middle East. May the Prince of Peace bring light and peace to us all. Merry Christmas.
Miguel Ángel Abellanas tweet media
English
0
0
1
49
Miguel Ángel Abellanas retweetledi
Eric Topol
Eric Topol@EricTopol·
Why do heart attacks during the night cause less damage than during daytime? The role of neutrophils and circadian clock genes in reducing inflammation and injury @JExpMed in experimental model rupress.org/jem/article/22…
Eric Topol tweet media
English
7
100
399
41.6K
Miguel Ángel Abellanas retweetledi
Neil Renic
Neil Renic@NC_Renic·
By using AI for writing, you’re robbing yourself of the authentic writer’s experience of not writing
English
98
8.4K
56.8K
829.8K
Miguel Ángel Abellanas retweetledi
Maite Solas
Maite Solas@maitesolaszu·
Absolutely thrilled to share that I’ve been awarded an ERC Consolidator Grant for HyperAstroMet! 🚀🧠✨ The next 5 years are going to be an incredible journey — stay tuned for opportunities to join the team! 🙌 Huge thanks to @ERC_Research 💫 #ERCCoG
European Research Council (ERC)@ERC_Research

The results of the ERC Consolidator Grant call have been announced! 📣 349 researchers have been selected for funding. Congratulations to all! #ERCCogG! 👉 erc.europa.eu/news-events/ne… #FrontierResearch #EUfunded #HorizonEurope @EUScienceInnov

English
38
10
76
3.3K
Miguel Ángel Abellanas retweetledi
Oded Rechavi
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi·
Having a PhD means you can find the word “unfortunately” in an email faster that the search function
English
36
255
3.7K
119.8K
Oded Rechavi
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi·
@maabellanas Thanks a lot! I'm very happy you liked it, and can't wait for you to try the new and much stronger verson! :)
English
1
0
2
21
Miguel Ángel Abellanas
Miguel Ángel Abellanas@maabellanas·
I tried it weeks ago, and I think it's a game-changer! I hope this really shakes up the editorial system
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi

BIG ANNOUNCEMENT📣: I haven’t been this excited to be part of something new in 15 years… Thrilled to reveal the passion project I’ve been working on for the past year and a half!🙀🥳 It started from my frustration with the depressing effect that the current publishing system has on the well-being of myself, my team, and pretty much every scientist I know (maybe you’ve noticed from my stupid jokes… :) I was exhausted of dealing with the huge delays, reviewers that can be abusive, and how arbitrary it all is. Unfortunately, the most important factors are often WHO your reviewers are and who YOU are... It’s clear we need alternatives or at least ways to improve the situation. So, together with a really special and talented team we worked to develop this idea into “qed” a platform where you can get CONSTRUCTIVE feedback on your own work or CRITICALLY assess other people’s papers. It can be a real difference maker if many of you join us (thousands have tried it already, but today we release a NEW and much stronger version ;) Let’s harness qed to put the power back in the scientists’ hands, to do, to read & to publish science on our own terms. I’m dying for you to TRY IT, and it’s very simple - just drop a paper (the link to the website is in the replies👇) - it’s completely secure, private, and free, and you get results fast. Please show your support, SHARE, tell your friends, and let’s be the revolution 🫵!

English
1
2
13
3.7K