Patterson

@danno41662 @TuckerCarlson You can look at the evidence. There has been an independent investigation into 911. Read Dr. Judy Wood’s book- nothing in it has been refuted because it is simply physical evidence.

@TuckerCarlson I don't believe 9/11 could be a building demolition and no one noticed it being wired for it, nor has anyone come forward as being involved in such a massive conspiracy. I'm open minded but like chemtrails I'm just not onboard with all conspiracy theories. Need solid evidence!

There’s never been a legitimate criminal investigation into 9-11, the deadliest terror attack in US history. Roger Waters is trying to change that. 0:00 Waters' Thoughts on 9-11 and Where He Was When It Happened 14:29 Were Americans and Israelis Involved in 9-11? 18:47 The Note Waters Wrote to Himself 27:42 Why Would Waters Risk Everything to Weigh In on 9-11? 30:09 The JFK Files, Ukraine, and Russia 33:08 What Was the Response to Waters Raising Questions About 9-11? 36:57 Is the West Moving Toward an Actual War With Russia? 39:27 Propaganda of the Ruling Class and the UK's Censorship 43:37 The Israel Lobby Blocking Waters From Supporting Disabled Veterans 53:50 The Israeli Lobby Within South America 55:41 Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, Mike Huckabee, and Christian Zionism 57:49 The Iran War 1:00:43 Why Has the Media Slandered Waters for His Stance? 1:04:11 The Media's Role in War 1:07:24 Can the Iranian and Russian Conflicts Be Resolved Peacefully?

@CDHx7x @AlexFinn Yes the council meetings are wild, indeed. That’s the exact spot you’ll find the people most ‘passionate’ or extreme about it. Most people aren’t what the media, mainstream or alternative, portrays. Most happily in the middle, just wanting our counties to be compensated fairly.

@patterson620 @AlexFinn Now that’s a lie if I’ve ever seen it. These communities are losing their absolute minds. People are fighting against these data centers as though their kids lives depended on it. It’s extreme. I’ve been to these town council meetings

This is the single biggest existential threat to America today Our most popular and influential figures TRULY believe data centers are destroying our farms and drinking all our water Yesterday one of the biggest streamers in the world (Moistcritical) told his audience that data centers are putting sludge in all our water and making us all sick People truly believe this. They're buying into it. It will be one of the biggest reasons people vote in upcoming elections It has the potential to single handedly destroy America Putting aside all the incredible benefits of AI and its ability to allow ANYONE to build and accomplish anything they want, AI will be the single most important factor for national security In the next 15 years wars will no longer be fought by humans. They'll be fought 100% by drones and other robots. Whoever has the smartest and best AI will win the wars. Nations that reject AI will be dominated by nations that embrace AI. It's like if nations rejected guns right before world war 2. They'd be doomed. The single biggest threat to national security right now doesn't come from the outside. It comes from the inside. It comes from influencers who know literally nothing about technology telling the masses that AI is drinking all your water, despite the fact that golf courses consume 30x more water than data centers on an annual basis. If we as the tech community don't do a better job educating the masses and more importantly helping the masses get value out of this incredible technology, America and therefore the world is screwed. It's time to fight back against the misinformation.

@DeivonDrago @BobMurphyEcon You call this a collapse? lol

@BobMurphyEcon I think that’s more or less accurate. There were obviously additional planners - eg KSM.

Can someone point me to a respectable conspiracy theory that I can believe in? I feel left out. 😢

@abovousqueadma2 @BobMurphyEcon @DeivonDrago You’re right, if you look at the facts and understand 9/11 there is no need for a conspiracy theory. 19 bad guys with box cutters brought down 7 buildings in the WTC complex is a theory not based on the evidence.

@BobMurphyEcon @DeivonDrago He specifically asked for a credible one

@DeivonDrago @dab_chick @BobMurphyEcon 19 bad guys with box cutters brought down 7 buildings in the WTC complex is a theory not based on the evidence. If you look at the facts, you will understand what happened.

@dab_chick @BobMurphyEcon Ah yes. That would make it a conspiracy but not a conspiracy theory!

@nntaleb @bryan_johnson I have never seen you talk about 9/11 @nntaleb

@bryan_johnson You are fundamentally a dishonest person. Who are you bullshitting? The bulk of your interventions are additive. Eating organic food and looking at trees and or doing yoga is a standard intervention.

People forget what I have subtracted. Removing harm is my best performing longevity therapy. What I've removed: > 15,000 chemicals in the industrial food supply > chronic anger and resentment > inconsistent sleep timing > loneliness and isolation > excess sugar and fat > water contaminants > toxic relationships > being overweight > sleep deprivation > being sedentary > late night eating > scroll addiction > poor air quality > junk light > nicotine > alcohol

@EdTheHeretic @Omnicentrist The buildings didn’t fall or collapse. When buildings collapse they leave a thud- seismic data does not reflect this. When buildings fall they leave a rubble pile 12.5% of the total height of the building. Why was it only 2%? And why did the survivors look up and see the sun?

@Omnicentrist They fell because the resultant fire softened the nuts and bolts that held the steel beams together. . Fire is the enemy of steel buildings. . Ask any professionally trained fireman or structural engineer. .

If you still think these buildings fell because aircraft hit them, even though they were designed to take exactly that impact. You probably vote Labor and are still getting COVID boosters.

@Omnicentrist The buildings didn’t fall mate. Choosing your words is paramount.

@SolBrah @ThorTorrens So all the old books and manuscripts recommend a time of being restrictive but new age philosophy and Mantak Chia says you can just masturbate and make the energy rise yourself! Oh how this side of twitter is doomed. Restrictive does not equal shameful.

@ThorTorrens valid points, that is the advanced stage but people beginning the tradition usually have to a have a period of full removal of the physical sensations to reset true high level retention is an expression to rise higher, not this restrictive/shameful thing as you mention 🙏

Most guys have semen retention all wrong. Including Connor. Treating it like a prison sentence with no touch means pure suppression, and total stagnation. That’s the low level way and not what you want going into battle. The ascended path isn’t about deprivation it’s about absolute mastery and cultivation. Harnessing that potential energy. That raw chi flow. You can still be physically intimate without spilling your life force. Instead of letting your seed blast outward and deplete you, you ride the edge, using breath to pull that vital force up the spine and circulate it through the cosmos of your own nervous system. It turns intimacy into a closed-loop energy generator. You get to have your cake and eat it too. You experience deep physical connection without draining the battery, which then unlocks a level of raw power and mental clarity that completely eclipses the stagnant frustration of total abstinence. The real warrior knows this to be true.

@ThorTorrens You’re talking about the microcosmic orbit. That energy that you’re sending to the head, is supposed to rise there naturally with real training. If it’s forced to rise you’re actually contaminating the highest aspects of yourself with your lowest aspects.

@911Revisionist @DrcharlieWardQ @edwardcurrent 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Poor @DrcharlieWardQ is still stuck in 2011, when this HOAX video of Building 7 was created by @edwardcurrent Have a listen to him explain how he created the hoax video. Sorry peeps - Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.

@911Revisionist Brother you called it a collapse 🙂

On July 4, 2000, during the OpSail Independence Day celebration, a U.S. Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bomber made a rare flyover of New York City, soaring above the former World Trade Center towers. This event marked the first and only time the B-2 was photographed over the Twin Towers before their collapse on September 11, 2001. The B-2, known for its distinctive flying wing design and radar-evading capabilities, was part of a larger aerial display commemorating Independence Day. The B-2 Spirit, developed by Northrop Grumman, is one of the most advanced and expensive aircraft in the U.S. military arsenal, with each unit costing over $2 billion. Designed for both conventional and nuclear missions, the bomber can deliver precision strikes while remaining virtually undetectable. The 2000 flyover remains a poignant image, capturing a moment of American military prowess juxtaposed against the iconic skyline that would change forever just over a year later.

@jasoncrawford America has to confront the problem in front of itself. We cannot move forward without addressing 9/11. @jasoncrawford you should read Dr. Judy Wood’s book ‘Where Did the Towers Go’. Not one thing in the book has ever been refuted, because it is simply a book of evidence.

@PromptLLM What was the prompt

you are what you do daily

@911Revisionist Why’s it look like this? Contrast adjusted?

This is NOT a structural collapse, or a conventional controlled demolition, using thermal or kinetic mechanisms. It's a disintegration on a molecular level.

@damnNathaniel91 @bruce_barrett @L337Lolz @papaG711 #4 ‘you can hear it’ Oh you’re bringing out all the senses! What a big boy. It was actually so quiet that most people’s statements recall them not remembering hearing either tower get destroyed. People couldn’t believe it because they never heard it.

They abandoned the pancake theory as the “initiation of the collapse”. Like I said above, instability and a 300,000 lb commercial jetliner deliberately targeting the buildings at over 500+ mph blowing enormous holes in the towers, erasing multiple floors, leaving jet fuel to burn the remaining the steel causing its structural integrity to further weaken caused columns to sag and buckle, which caused the initial collapse, not the pancaking. Then you can clearly see the upper block of floors left above the impact zone pancaking onto one another as it came down. You can even hear it happening on phone calls between 911 operators and people in the towers during the collapse like Kevin Cosgroves final call when he’s in Doug Cherrys office.

@damnNathaniel91 @bruce_barrett @L337Lolz @papaG711 #3 ‘You can see the upper block of floors pancaking down’ No I see the upper block of floors falling over- tipping over, it’s not pancaking straight down. You then see the building peel like a banana.

@damnNathaniel91 @bruce_barrett @L337Lolz @papaG711 #2 ‘Leaving jet fuel to burn the remaining steel’ Did you know Underwriters Labs were hired to reconstruct the scene. They burned the floors for twice as long and twice as hot and couldn’t get the floors to collapse. Yet they signed off on it, thats fraud.

@damnNathaniel91 @bruce_barrett @L337Lolz @papaG711 How’s an airplane wing going to cut through a steel building? They have no standing signs on the wingtips of airplanes, yet we’re supposed to believe the wingtips can cut through steel?

@damnNathaniel91 @bruce_barrett @L337Lolz @papaG711 Ok we’ll take all that step by step. A 300,000lb airliner hitting the twin towers. Ok, have you seen what happens to an airplane when it hits a bird? It’s Newton’s third law of physics. That building was applying an equal force back to the airplane upon impact.