inspectorofhuckleberries

5.2K posts

inspectorofhuckleberries

inspectorofhuckleberries

@roberticus9

blabla

Brooklyn Katılım Kasım 2020
243 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Peter Thomson
Peter Thomson@Rosiodonnal·
@DEADLINE Had to Google a bitch. Imagine where she'd be, if the technology to "capture" people on film or video didn't exist. She'd be plying her "trade" on a fucking stage, complaining about the same shit. A.I. is the fucking future. DEAL with it.
English
29
0
4
3.2K
Magic Flower
Magic Flower@MagicFlower22·
Direct Hit in Israel a few minutes ago. Please Pray for us !
English
2K
166
959
60.2K
Margot Cleveland
Margot Cleveland@ProfMJCleveland·
The most out of control cost that New York City residents deal with everyday is the New York City government.
English
18
46
406
13.1K
Arsen Ostrovsky
Arsen Ostrovsky@Ostrov_A·
Horrific! Iranian ballistic missile striking the central Israeli city of Petah Tikva, as families meant to be celebrating Passover, one of the holiest periods of the Jewish year! World response? DEAFENING SILENCE!
English
14.7K
1.2K
6.1K
1.4M
WIRED
WIRED@WIRED·
Researchers at the company found representations inside of Claude that perform functions similar to human feelings. wired.com/story/anthropi…
English
20
5
13
31.1K
Timothy B. Lee
Timothy B. Lee@binarybits·
I think some currents of contemporary left-wing thought are best understood as secular people craving the shared sense of moral purity we traditionally got from religion. Most recent example: taboos against AI use.
English
58
84
1K
99.7K
Seth Mandel
Seth Mandel@SethAMandel·
Big part of the problem with Western discourse is that the 'pro-Palestinian' advocates in the West don't actually care what happens to Palestinians, they're solely focused on harming Israel. So you get opposition to Iron Dome, a position that puts more Palestinians at risk
Noam Blum@neontaster

This is the dumbest "analysis" around. Mass casualty attacks on Israel by Hamas or Hezbollah or Iran would trigger a response that would make anything we've seen so far pale in comparison. Iron Dome actually lets Israel be restrained.

English
109
106
764
156.1K
Avi Yemini
Avi Yemini@OzraeliAvi·
After years of putting my life on the line defending Israel, calling out every blood libel and every terror apologist, yesterday’s Knesset vote has finally broken me. They just passed a death-penalty law for convicted terrorists “with blood on their hands.” I’ve spent my entire adult life arguing Israel is better than this. Turns out I was wrong. This isn’t self-defence. This is the moment we became what our enemies always claimed we were. I can’t defend it anymore. Not today. Not ever again. The mask is off.
English
1.3K
457
3.7K
1.1M
Carly Pildis
Carly Pildis@CarlyPildis·
It’s absolutely despicable that any Member of Congress would commit to this. The most outrageous part is the verbiage “so-called defense capabilities.” Israelis are currently in bomb shelters. On October 7th Israelis were gang raped, burned alive, tortured and killed. Even puppies weren’t spared. Israelis have a right to self defense and America should stand with our allies. No fake concern for Palestinians here - defunding US contributions to Israeli self defense systems would not only fail to improve Palestinian lives in anyway, it would endanger them. Completely unforgivable behavior.
Peter Sterne@petersterne

BREAKING: At tonight’s NYC-DSA electoral forum, @AOC committed to voting against “any spending on arms for Israel, including so-called defensive capabilities.”

English
89
59
237
29.4K
Arsen Ostrovsky
Arsen Ostrovsky@Ostrov_A·
🚨 It’s just relentless! On eve of Passover, one of the holiest periods of the Jewish calendar, Iran is raining down missiles - with cluster munitions - on Israel.
Arsen Ostrovsky tweet media
English
4K
342
1.8K
239.1K
Rep Josh Gottheimer
Rep Josh Gottheimer@RepJoshG·
I’m confused. Defensive military aid stops rockets aimed at innocent children and families. So, why oppose it? We provide defensive military aid to Ukraine, Taiwan, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Kenya, etc. @AOC Should we cut all of them off? Or is that your policy just for the Jews?
Peter Sterne@petersterne

BREAKING: At tonight’s NYC-DSA electoral forum, @AOC committed to voting against “any spending on arms for Israel, including so-called defensive capabilities.”

English
1.8K
670
3.8K
463K
Jamie Metzl
Jamie Metzl@JamieMetzl·
I am a Democrat. I would never support AOC for president. It would be suicidal for the Democratic Party to choose a far left extremist as our candidate.
English
2K
261
2.9K
533.9K
Eric Adams
Eric Adams@ericadamsfornyc·
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just committed to voting to strip civilians in Israel of protection from rocket attacks. This is not a vote against the government of Israel, or Netanyahu. This is collective punishment against ten million civilians, Jews, Muslims, and Christians. Voting against defensive systems isn’t progressive. It isn’t pro-human rights. It’s indefensible. There is no moral justification for leaving civilians exposed to deadly rockets aimed at them.
Eric Adams tweet media
Peter Sterne@petersterne

BREAKING: At tonight’s NYC-DSA electoral forum, @AOC committed to voting against “any spending on arms for Israel, including so-called defensive capabilities.”

English
2.1K
557
2.9K
396.7K
The New Yorker
The New Yorker@NewYorker·
At many Jewish institutions, rejecting Zionism is indeed regarded as a form of sacrilege. But more and more American Jews are having a hard time reconciling other core features of their identity with support for Israel’s current government. newyorkermag.visitlink.me/KbUGTg
English
284
163
649
587.1K
BBALLBREAKDOWN
BBALLBREAKDOWN@bballbreakdown·
The push off by SGA is the one move I think should be called more often. Especially when he extends the arm fully. But don't forget: the defender is already moving in that direction so sometimes it looks worse than it is. I'm not sure there was a ton of influence by this push off tho
English
160
17
544
95.3K
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
Writing is thinking, and people who outsource the full writing process to AI will find their screens full of words and their minds empty of thought. But also: All writing involves and has always involved “outsourcing”—reaching outside of the writer’s mind to pull in pieces of the world, before and after the work of making words. Writers draw their ideas from other people, books, articles; after writing they often rely on outside copy editors, fact checkers, transcribers. Some of this stuff is just going to be done by AI in the future, and the boundaries between “good behavior” and “bad behavior” will have some blurry lines, and we should be honest and open about the blur rather than declare everybody with an open Claude window a part of the slopclass. Anybody who says AI transcription of long interviews obliterates the identity of a writer is being a little silly. But what about copy editing? Claude is a fast and decent copy editor, but it is inhuman to rely on it for that function? Is it moral to google “Econ papers on income transfers for child poverty” but immoral to write the same thing as an AI prompt? What about throwing 500 muddled words into ChatGPT and saying “does this make any sense? what do you think I’m trying to say here?” That’s going to be useful for some people. At an aesthetic level, I don’t like copy-pasting AI paragraphs into articles and pressing publish. That feels like me cheating myself. It feels like de-skilling. But the idea that “using AI” is anathema to the identity of being a writer is, in a few years, going to sound an awful lot like claiming that “using a computer” is a violation of the craft of writing. (Which, haha, maybe it is and we should all just go back to Steinbeck and his pencils; but talk about ships that have sailed.)
Emily Gould@EmilyGouldNYmag

using AI to "be a writer" is like .. playing a porn video game where you make your avatar cum

English
54
75
602
146.6K
Legion Hoops
Legion Hoops@LegionHoops·
Refs take away SGA’s game winning three. Unreal.
English
710
409
13.3K
1.6M
Joe Weisenthal
Joe Weisenthal@TheStalwart·
IMO it's delusional to deny AI's potential for research. There are well-known pitfalls ofc (hallucinations are one, obsequiousness and convincingness are others). But I also think it'll make people's knowledge more digital, in the sense that people will know about X and only X.
English
24
9
268
39.9K