satvik

41.4K posts

satvik banner
satvik

satvik

@sxtvik

Contributor @OfflineProtocol

Katılım Mayıs 2016
252 Takip Edilen26.2K Takipçiler
satvik retweetledi
gaz
gaz@Nyazsche·
gaz tweet media
ZXX
42
5.6K
72.5K
528K
Zak Krevitt
Zak Krevitt@zak_krevitt·
@sxtvik Yes, and I have a Clio award to show for it! I ran the Diesel Reboot UGC campaign on tumblr + its global extensions into the real world. Less direct experience with clipping but I’m familiar with the landscape and feel confident I could handle.
English
1
0
2
56
Zak Krevitt
Zak Krevitt@zak_krevitt·
I’m looking for my next great opportunity. Open to freelance, fractional, or full-time roles in GTM, Partnerships, and Growth. Huge bonus if the product is truly net-good for society. Over the last decade: - Helped scale products to $1B+ - Managed $10M+ in marketing and partner programs - Lead GTM and partnership programs across North America, Europe, LATAM, and Asia - Managed partnerships with artists, developers, musicians, influencers, - Launched products and communities in Brooklyn, Brazil, Japan, Thailand, Mexico, Argentina, Paris, UK and beyond - Worked across partnerships, creative, product, growth, marketing, community, and AI to turn early-stage products into global ecosystems. - Lead award winning UGC campaigns multi billion dollar global fashion brands - developed dozens of in house tools from scratch - lead teams of 1, 10, and 20 - I’ve been working with AI as a creative and developer since 2021 - I’m legally permitted to work in both EU and US I love messy zero-to-one problems, international expansion, creator economies, and building systems that scale. If your team needs someone who can both develop the strategy and execute it, I’d love to chat. Am very interested in early stage startups with high growth potential, but open to hearing from anyone with an idea and a budget. DMs are open 🫡
Zak Krevitt tweet media
English
8
6
48
2.4K
Prasanna S
Prasanna S@myprasanna·
Launching @vorfluxai : The autopilot for software engineering. I was prev co-founder / CTO of @Rippling ($10B) and #1 coder in India. Vorflux is my high octane Ferrari. Every AI coding tool still makes you fly the plane. That's the copilot model: you stay in the seat, approving every turn. The models quietly got good enough to fly the whole route, but the tools never caught up. So we built the autopilot. @vorfluxai raised a $15M seed by @ycombinator @peakxvpartners @alliancedao @parkerconrad @jake_zeller @balajis @nivi @metakovan @lmrankhan @nikitabase @0xrwu @ayushjaiswal @mattshumer_ @eshamanideep @sreeramkannan @dvcoolster @nusimow @TeddySolomon11 @ashtoncofer @rvivek etc Drop your biggest engineering bottleneck below. I'll reply with how I'd attack it with Vorflux, and hand you $200 in free credits to bang out your backlog. Our full thesis 🧵👇
English
354
129
1.5K
474.5K
sesepuh
sesepuh@ekiarisandi__·
@sxtvik What about the x offline protocol account that deleted all its posts, leaving only one post?
English
1
0
1
49
satvik
satvik@sxtvik·
back in training and have never felt better
English
4
0
42
2.2K
satvik
satvik@sxtvik·
@glennonchain @NYCMayor But you’re blaming this on Mamdani when it’s not his doing? And Mamdani has not platformer racism against any ethnic groups, that is a false equivalence click baity accounts love to make despite it being completely wrong and fact checked every time. Also, what radicalism?
English
0
0
0
33
Glenn | Alchemy
Glenn | Alchemy@glennonchain·
@sxtvik @NYCMayor Had I seen it then I would have been equally upset Adams (who I voted for) had multiple other issues, but consistently platforming racism against certain ethnic groups / antisemitism / socialism / radicalism were not among them, and that’s where I draw the line personally
English
1
0
0
99
satvik
satvik@sxtvik·
For the past 5 years, I used to spend a few hours on Figma everyday, but at the start of this year I became completely dependent on instead fighting my LLMs to design everything for me. Over time I stopped opening Figma, especially once Claude Design came out. Today, I found myself really struggling with my agents, no matter what I prompted, no matter if I tried it with Codex or Claude, or specialized tools like Variant, I just didn’t really feel anything looking at their output. Exited out of all my sessions and opened Figma again. A lot has changed and improved about Figma while I’ve been gone but the real realization was that the dependency on agentic workflows has made me lose a big chunk of my own creativity, which I always regarded as my personal moat. I blankly stared at the screen and hated everything I made today, but I plan to try again tomorrow, and again the day after. I never want an LLM to take my creativity away ever again.
Dylan Field@zoink

I have been thinking about whether to comment on this. Not clear if Gal is serious, rage baiting, etc. Whatever the case, it has spread enough in the design community that I want to share some thoughts. The psychological journey people go through with AI is quite fascinating to me. A new model launches, people think the world has changed, they sometimes have an existential crisis, then they play with the model, they understand its strengths and limitations and then they settle down. A few weeks later, the cycle repeats. On top of this, even before AI, designers have often shown insecurity and imposter syndrome. There are probably many reasons for this. First, before ~2010 design wasn't valued by the tech industry in the way it is today. Second, the people attracted to working in the field of design are often very open to new ideas and have high empathy. Third, there is no "one path" to working as a designer and designer backgrounds are often pretty random. Ironically, despite the insecurity + imposter syndrome so many designers feel, design is more important than ever. I truly believe this. And yes, I have an incentive to believe this. But just think about it... the logic couldn't be more clear. More design is entering the world, the attention economy is real and therefore creativity / design / point of view is how you will stand out. Your brand, marketing, product design, moments of delight and overall customer journey must be excellent. Some companies already get this and are fighting wild battles over design talent. Other companies are still figuring it out. Everyone will get there and it will be obvious in retrospect. This isn't a new trend with AI. It is a trend that we've seen over the last decade. Designers used to complain about not having a seat at the table. Now designers have a seat at the table. And many of the businesses I speak with are pulling from their design bench when looking for new leaders for their business... they know that design thinking and the design process is what they need to adopt everywhere to win. I'm not saying that every stakeholder gets it. But so many are trying to learn right now. Designers need to do more than create great work, they have to spend a lot more effort educating. Showing work can also trigger anxiety. Sometimes the best solution to a design challenge is the first thing you think of. And other times you have to explore for quite a long time to come up with something great. Inputs to a design process might include things that feel like traditional office work and are easy to point to... reading docs, talking with teammates, formal research, etc. Inputs might also include a walk in the park, an interesting dream you had the night before, a good song you listened to on the radio during your commute, a painting from the 1800's or all sorts of other cultural / emotional input. In summary, I've never been more confident in the role of design and impact design can have. I wish designers felt the same confidence. This is the moment to be more bold, to take more creative risk, to double down on the power of design. Everyone is on their own journey, and there are lots of fascinating ways to move through life, so if Gal is serious about "quitting design" then I wish him the best in his adventures ahead. But I hope if others follow they do it because there are other things they are so excited about spending time on vs fear of AI.

English
12
8
213
28.9K
Dennis Beatty
Dennis Beatty@dnsbty·
@rtwlz Seems like you've already got several offers like this, but I built @surgeapi specifically to make the carrier registration process simpler, faster, and more transparent. I'd be happy to help if you're interested.
English
1
0
1
331
Riley Walz
Riley Walz@rtwlz·
Do I know anyone at twilio? (helping make an SF scavenger hunt that 9k people signed up for over SMS. we applied for a 1-800 number to increase limits but got rejected 3 times for unclear reasons. me and the 20 friends behind the hunt would be very grateful 🙏)
English
39
3
382
71.5K
Alliance
Alliance@alliance·
"What i love is, these people are the top 0.5%... We work hard to get as many applications in, and we read their stories, and the ones that inspire us, they're the ones who make it in." @DangerWillRobin - Head of Capital Formation.
English
14
12
113
40.4K
Haseeb >|<
Haseeb >|<@hosseeb·
As a VC, Fable is better than me at VC work. It breaks down white papers better than I do. It's better at financial analysis. It chews through mountains of diligence in minutes. There is no single well-scoped intellectual task where I beat a frontier AI. I catch its mistakes sometimes, but it catches mine more often. If my job is "VC work," then Fable is better than me at my job. But Fable alone would be a mediocre investor. It would quickly pass on all the bunk, sure. But among the set of doable deals, it can't find the one with the je ne sais quoi. It doesn't have the bias toward special people, wild ideas, or risk-taking. Its tweets and thinkpieces are OK, but they're too safe, too obvious. I can prompt it in the right direction, but even then it's not quite right. It's too suggestible. It changes its mind too easily. It's not stubborn, self-assured, irrationally confident about how the future will play out, the way great investors are. But me + Fable is really good. Better than either of us alone. In fact every investor on our team has leveled up with AI in the same way. We all feel we have more to do now, not less. We feel more capable, not less. My theory is that AI disempowers service providers and empowers owners. If you sell your labor by the task, AI is genuinely terrifying. It can accomplish that task cheaper, faster, with more control and less bullshit. But if you own the outcome, if you're using AI to do something for you, then AI is amazing. It's empowering, not disempowering. Make your own logo, design your own website, write your own copy, build your own systems. It also means is that you should aim to reorganize yourself in the food chain. If you don't, AI will do it for you. Don't be a service provider, be an owner. If you're building something, you are a beneficiary of AI, all of the incredible gains that AI is enabling will accrue to you too. But if you're a tax on people building things, just know that the tax rate on building is rapidly going to 0.
Gal Shir@galshirart

It’s over. I’m quitting design. A client of mine just created a logo with Fable 5, and the result left me speechless. It understood the brand story, values, audience, strategy, and turned all of it into a smart, minimal symbol. A genuinely brilliant concept. The kind of idea that captures everything at once. Something I honestly don’t think I would have come up with myself. And it didn’t just nail the idea. It executed the design pixel-perfectly. So I raise the white flag. My skepticism about AI’s ability to do great design is officially gone. There, I said it: AI beat me at design. Now that AI finally took my job, I can peacefully quit and dedicate my life to studying the only thing it may never achieve: human consciousness and the pathways to God. Good luck everyone.

English
113
96
1.1K
205K
satvik
satvik@sxtvik·
@SHL0MS this could be yc backed
English
1
0
4
313
𒐪
𒐪@SHL0MS·
this can't be real
𒐪 tweet media
English
11
1
46
6.6K
satvik
satvik@sxtvik·
@ldf_gm it would be wonderful and cure the world
English
0
0
0
35
LDF
LDF@ldf_gm·
@sxtvik exhibition one of my impossible goals (not impossible)
LDF tweet media
English
1
0
1
83