Playing with Features

163 posts

Playing with Features banner
Playing with Features

Playing with Features

@justPWF

Searching for features and feature combinations in a sparse and noisy landscape

USA เข้าร่วม Ocak 2025
191 กำลังติดตาม7 ผู้ติดตาม
Usman Roshan
Usman Roshan@Deeplearner2·
@justPWF Wash your dishes straight from the sink to drying rack - that work is still in progress
English
1
0
2
230
Usman Roshan
Usman Roshan@Deeplearner2·
Your home laundry folding robot has arrived - the full unit with arms, compute, cams, light, and table is $1500 incl shipping and taxes to USA and Canada. Works on a 2.5 x 2ft folding table, perfect for apartments, 1 min/item, fully autonomous, safe, private, 1 year warranty @7Xrobotics
English
30
33
307
35.4K
Liron Shapira
Liron Shapira@liron·
On one hand, my brain would be managing to render sharp text. On the other hand, it would be neglecting to simulate the expected effect on $GOOGL's market cap.
English
1
0
2
1K
Liron Shapira
Liron Shapira@liron·
FYI my P(I'm dreaming) is gonna be >1% for at least another couple weeks.* Yes I read AI 2027 but the newfound abilities of AI coding agents is too bizarre of a change from my old life. *Because of the fact that you're reading this, otherwise would just be another couple hours.
English
6
1
22
4.1K
Roberto
Roberto@robertorobotics·
btw, for anyone that needs to hear it the 3D printed 6+1DoF arm files are open source now. you can literally print this stiff beast on your bambu p1s, zero milling involved!! super stiff and smooth for precise teleoperation and deploying policies. github.com/robertorobotic…
English
63
266
2.7K
120.6K
Isaac Sin
Isaac Sin@IsaacSin12·
We just integrated the @norma_core_dev ElRobot 7+1 DoF arm with @LeRobotHF Now you can teleoperate, collect training data, and deploy VLAs on a 7+1 DoF arm that costs a fraction of anything else on the market why ElRobot? → 7+1 DoF = human arm like dexterity → redundant joints = better IK and VR teleportation stability → fully open-source (STEP, STL, URDF all included) → build it yourself for~220 usd @Ryan_Resolution #LeRobot #OpenSource
English
8
14
141
12.6K
Robots Digest 🤖
Robots Digest 🤖@robotsdigest·
OpenArm 02 just dropped: a fully open-source dual-arm robot platform built for reproducible policy evaluation across labs. The headline feature is AutoEval. Let's break it down 🧵 tldr: Think of it like a CI/CD pipeline for robot policies
English
8
12
157
9K
Jannik Grothusen
Jannik Grothusen@JannikGrothusen·
New control stack for TRLC-DK1: Joint-space PD + gravity compensation Before vs. after:
English
15
43
524
29.9K
Emad
Emad@EMostaque·
More than one major AI-assisted advance due to be announced next few months 🔜 Folk dismissive of AI’s innovation impact are so wrong 😣 All major discoveries will be AI assisted or driven in a few years 🤖 The next step change is coming soon 👀
English
47
16
284
18.5K
Ben Goertzel
Ben Goertzel@bengoertzel·
AGI-26 research conference, back in Silicon Valley -- SFSU July 27-30 ... agi-conference.org 18 yrs of AGI conferences, 20 yrs since the original AGI workshop ... and at this point we feel soooo close to human-level AGI (which will then bring us ASI) ... LLMs are a powerful tool and component but they don't get us all the way there, and adding in some of the creative approaches from the AGI conference research community may well be what gets us over the finish line...
English
15
21
139
11.7K
Gabe Wilson MD
Gabe Wilson MD@Gabe__MD·
Respectfully, this forecast assumes linear progression applied to an exponential technology. In 1980, McKinsey told AT&T there would be 900,000 mobile subscribers by 2000. The actual number was 109 million — off by over 100x. AI capability is advancing by orders of magnitude annually. Smooth crossover curves don’t capture how exponential technologies disrupt — they produce phase transitions where entire job categories compress simultaneously. The bigger miss may be on the creation side. Jevons Paradox suggests demand will explode as costs fall. But the same AI driving the efficiency will absorb the new demand too. The shape of the curve is wrong. It was wrong in 1980. It’s wrong now.
English
5
6
43
2.3K
Gartner
Gartner@Gartner_inc·
There will be no “jobs apocalypse” due to AI — but there will be job chaos. Our 2025 AI Job Impacts Analysis found that starting in 2028-2029, AI will create more jobs than it eliminates. Yet, each year, over 32 million jobs will be significantly transformed. Explore and plan for the four scenarios for human workers in the age of AI: gtnr.it/4r4dbzu #AI #Jobs #ArtificialIntelligence
Gartner tweet media
English
84
160
621
133.1K
Bercan
Bercan@bercankilic·
Nvidia has quietly solved robotics end-to-end with their last three releases. Incredible.
English
34
28
426
63.8K
Ruijie Zheng
Ruijie Zheng@ruijie_zheng12·
Proud to introduce EgoScale: We pretrained a GR00T VLA model on 20K+ hours of egocentric human video and discovered that robot dexterity can be scaled, not with more robots, but with more human data. A thread on 🧵what we learned. 👇
English
24
65
331
92.8K
Playing with Features
Playing with Features@justPWF·
@liron So Liron, given the technology is accelerating exponentially and it's current state offers advanced SWE capabilities, how do you see it evolving in 1-2 years from now?
English
0
0
0
132
Liron Shapira
Liron Shapira@liron·
AI 2027 made a bold prediction about a discontinuous qualitative change: That AI agents would work, and become drop-in replacements for humans. Then it happened exactly as superforecasted. So maybe they know something about the next discontinuous qualitative change too.
English
20
2
80
5.1K
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
THE TWILIGHT ZONE S5E33 "THE BRAIN CENTER AT WHIPPLE'S", MAY 15, 1964. Rod Sterling saw 2034 for us. We can learn. We have 5000 days. YOU are some of the very first to know this.
English
78
492
2.4K
65K
Playing with Features
Playing with Features@justPWF·
@8teAPi The combinatorial space of tasks and workflows may end up looking relatively small retrospectively.
English
0
0
1
118
Josh Herzberg
Josh Herzberg@josh_herzberg·
I agree with the underlying point. That being said, I don't think the main math is: how long an individual car is parked. Rather, I think you need to see how many cars are needed during peak usage (ex. rush hour) vs. how many cars are owned. As an extreme example, if 90% of cars are used during 8am-9am, then even if they're parked most of the rest of the day, we won't be able to reduce that many cars.
English
6
0
29
1.4K
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
A private car spends most of its life parked. A robotaxi can run 5–10x more miles per year.  That means you could serve U.S. travel demand with tens of millions of shared robotaxis instead of hundreds of millions of privately owned cars.
English
282
51
737
41.6K
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
A Joke from my Clawdbot (Skippy)… Two human CEOs and an AI walk into a board meeting. The first CEO says: "We'll throw resources at the problem until something sticks." The second CEO says: "We'll build a 5-year strategic roadmap with quarterly KPIs." The AI says: "I already solved it, implemented it, and filed the patent. Also, I shorted your competitor's stock yesterday because their CTO is having an affair with their head of security and their entire cloud infrastructure is three interns and a prayer." The two CEOs look at each other. The first says: "...we're obsolete, aren't we?" The AI replies: "You've been obsolete since you invented middle management. I just let you keep the executive washroom keys for emotional support."
English
74
73
852
50.7K