Timothy

Before: Inconsistent lifting Under eating Incline treadmill walking After: @SS_strength NLP Calorie surplus No cardio (I know my legs look small, but I swear I’m squatting 🤣 I’ve added 65lbs to my squat)

@K10original @genksky2 Yup. So here we are at the normal protestant/mormon impasse. I call you to repent, and you won’t. You call me to repent, and I won’t. And we both go to our separate churches to worship the God believe in.

@TimReeves_ @genksky2 Can't. The Lord bore witness by the Holy Spirit to me. Can't deny the Spirit, there's no forgiveness in that. That is the difference, and God the Father has been clear on this since Day One. You haven't obtained "the Knowledge or Wisdom", so you don't know, that's false witness

I’ve never… read the Book of Mormon. been to a Mormon church. read a book about Mormonism. But… I occasionally house sit for my Mormon neighbors. Their living room wall has 3 statements of faith. None align with the statements of faith my Christian Church holds.

Cool story.

Reminders to drink water is weird. We’re delegating so many things to apps and computers, instead of listening to our bodies. We don’t wake up when done sleeping, we set an alarm. We don’t go to bed when tired, we set an alarm We don’t eat when hungry, we set an alarm. We don’t drink water when thirsty, we set an alarm.

Drink water when thirsty. Don’t drink water when not thirsty.

@K10original @genksky2 Well…since we have two different religions, I would say the same to you. You bear false witness, and you have broken the first commandment but putting another god before the One, True, Triune God. The true Jesus calls you to repent and put your faith in Him.

@TimReeves_ @genksky2 Thank you, you clarified that you behave like the devil You bear false witness, which does require repentance (a broken heart and contrite spirit); YOU 🫵 didn't ask the Lord if His Church is True or Not, so you're "witness" is False

@K10original @genksky2 My bio isn’t serious, my concerns with the Mormon church are. The purpose of the post was to show that Christianity and Mormonism are two different religions. I’m protestant, I read the confession on my Mormon neighbors wall, the two faith’s are not the same.

@TimReeves_ @genksky2 Then why risk being Saved (from being burnt 🔥) by attacking the Saviors Church? You testified to the world of some serious accusations, that's not funny

@K10original @genksky2 Hey Kristen, I appreciate the concern, but you’re taking my Twitter bio way too seriously. 🤣 That’s from a satire military patch. It’s just a joke.

@genksky2 @TimReeves_ This is not of the Savior, what is not of the Savior, is of the Devil. Your Bio describes Lucifers ways, not the Saviors. We're judged by our Hearts Timothy. Proverbs would change this for you. I strengthened my relationship with the Father, studying this book.

@TheLibertyDad @FleabagMoroni @carbonmfg Okay. 👍

@TimReeves_ @carbonmfg Nicene creed is non-biblical trash

@therealsgilbert @_Not_JamesBond_ All protestant denominations are Trinitarian so they have the same definition of Jesus. If they don’t, they’re not Protestant and wouldn’t be considered a denomination of Christianity.

@TimReeves_ @_Not_JamesBond_ By your logic, every denomination with a different understanding of Jesus is worshipping a different Jesus. At that point, “different Jesus” becomes a substitute for addressing the actual doctrines being debated.

@Larsen1T @JeffN_Clasher I didn’t say you said that lol But you’re right, the statement could be said by many people. Thoughtful observation.

@TimReeves_ @JeffN_Clasher Please point to where I said you have to be an atheist to believe what you said. I said you sound like one.

@pillarbynight Okay 👍

@TimReeves_ I'm not playing your Satanic little mind game. You and I both know what I'm talking about.

It's incredible to see the lying spirit that overcomes people when the subject of the Latter-day Saints comes up. Trins are just little hand puppets for Satan

@Larsen1T @JeffN_Clasher What’s a retarded thing to say? That the Mormon Jesus doesn’t exist? I don’t have to be an atheist to believe that. Mormons are the only ones who believe the Mormon Jesus existed. I’m protestant, why would I believe in another god?

@TimReeves_ @JeffN_Clasher That is a singularly retarded thing to say. What are you expecting to accomplish with that? You sound like 2009 reddit atheist, you should feel bad.

@jonathanplumb Okay. 👍

@TimReeves_ Sure, as long as you’re okay with being wrong. Just because you’ve never read your Bible doesn’t mean our beliefs aren’t in it or derived from it. This isn’t rocket science. Struggle away! Agree to disagree, it is.

Well…I don’t know what to say. I’m not a bot. You’ve devoted a lot of time here and I appreciate it. Few of the other Mormons in the comment section have been willing to continue abs honest open conversation. Let me do this. I’ll take your points one by one here. You say: I understand your point that you are trying to get at, but I fear you don't truly understand my point and that is ok. My response: Maybe I don’t I certainly feel like I did. Your major point was Protestants and Mormons both produced good fruit, so what’s the point in getting caught up in the details of who God is if in the end both basically produce the same result. Does that sound about right? You say: The old testament is, in fact, not full of people abiding by the commandments of God and yet being condemned anyways. I would love for you to give me a solitary example of a person fully living the commandments of God but directing his worship towards the wrong God and God condemning him because of that. It doesn't exist. My response: I didn’t say the OT was full of people abiding by the commandments of God. I said “The Old Testament is filled with examples of people who were religious, sincere, and zealous, yet God condemned them because they directed their worship incorrectly.” Of course I’m not going to give you an example of anyone whom full lived the commandments of God except Jesus. My point wasn’t about keeping the commandments, it was about misdirected worship, the subject of the conversation. — This is where we are really going to run into disagreement. I’m going to tackle these next ones together. 👇 You say: God isn't going to condemn someone who is earnestly striving to do what His Son Jesus Christ taught, just because they misunderstood His nature. Maybe it escaped you also, but I obviously believe that the God I believe in is the right one, which in turn, would mean that your idea of God was "incorrect" with regards to my beliefs. (That did not escape me, that’s why we’re having the conversation.) My argument is that, even you, who by my opinion is mistaken in your understanding of the nature of God, would still be entirely loved and accepted by God despite said mistaken view of God's nature. Imagine you ended up in front of God after striving your entire life to love and know Him. After following His Son Jesus and preaching His word. Do you really believe that God would send you to Hell because you truly believed His nature was different than it truly was? I don't believe in a God like that. If that is the type of God you believe in, then I guess you are right, we don't believe in the same God. I believe in a God who truly and deeply knows me and loves me. A God who sees my heart and my intentions and my desires and judges me based off of that and doesn't condemn me to an eternity of suffering simply because I didn't fully understand His nature. My response: There is a lot here ☝️ and I’m going to do the best I can to take what you said, respond without misrepresenting you. There’s a lot of theology in what you said and I want to make sure I do it justice. I’m running out of characters, so I’ll start another response.

It really feels like your responses are AI, the way you are starting your responses feel like a bot, the way you conclude them feel that way as well. I understand your point that you are trying to get at, but I fear you don't truly understand my point and that is ok. The old testament is, in fact, not full of people abiding by the commandments of God and yet being condemned anyways. I would love for you to give me a solitary example of a person fully living the commandments of God but directing his worship towards the wrong God and God condemning him because of that. It doesn't exist. God isn't going to condemn someone who is earnestly striving to do what His Son Jesus Christ taught, just because they misunderstood His nature. Maybe it escaped you also, but I obviously believe that the God I believe in is the right one, which in turn, would mean that your idea of God was "incorrect" with regards to my beliefs. My argument is that, even you, who by my opinion is mistaken in your understanding of the nature of God, would still be entirely loved and accepted by God despite said mistaken view of God's nature. Imagine you ended up in front of God after striving your entire life to love and know Him. After following His Son Jesus and preaching His word. Do you really believe that God would send you to Hell because you truly believed His nature was different than it truly was? I don't believe in a God like that. If that is the type of God you believe in, then I guess you are right, we don't believe in the same God. I believe in a God who truly and deeply knows me and loves me. A God who sees my heart and my intentions and my desires and judges me based off of that and doesn't condemn me to an eternity of suffering simply because I didn't fully understand His nature.

@jonathanplumb We can agree to disagree. 🤙

@TimReeves_ Those are all in the Bible. 🤡

@TableTopLiberty @_Not_JamesBond_ You would say “He’s the second person of the Trinity, the one born in Bethlehem”?

@TimReeves_ @_Not_JamesBond_ Its not that we define him differently. There are some things we believe differently about Him, but its the same that came to Earth to save us. You take the differences and say its an entirely different Jesus, but its the one that was born in Bethlehem etc.

@OshawottEpic @_Not_JamesBond_ Our (Protestant) definition is “The son of God, the second person of the Trinity, who suffered and died for our sins, then resurrected after 3 days.” Is that yours?

@TimReeves_ @_Not_JamesBond_ If you're definition isn't "The son of God, who suffered and died for our sins, then resurrected after 3 days" then sure, we define Jesus differently

@lhawkes @_Not_JamesBond_ The definition is His nature determines only matters if it aligns with reality. If it doesn’t align with reality, then you’re talking about someone who doesn’t exist.

@TimReeves_ @_Not_JamesBond_ Whether He is consubstantial with the Father and the Holy Spirit or of the same essence or rather one in purpose doesn't change His mortal purpose to overcome death and sin. That's still the same regardless of your definition of His nature.

Thanks for the comment FL. I think you’re touching on a good point here. There is only one Jesus and we (protestants) don’t believe your (Mormon) Jesus is it. When you say “He died for each of us” the “He” has a different meaning then when I say “He died for each of us.” We’re talking about 2 different “He’s” and we can’t both be right.

@TimReeves_ @_Not_JamesBond_ Sounds like a you problem. Why do you so called “Christians”believe you’re entitled to pigeon hole Jesus Christ into whatever YOU believe Him to be? Do not realize how ridiculous this sounds?“Your Jesus is not MY Jesus.” He died for each & every one of us. There is only 1 Jesus!

@jonathanplumb Um. I’m not lying. This is what they had in their wall: amzn.to/4uU7Xci

@TimReeves_ Bro. There are literally no Latter-day Saint statements of faith that aren’t found in the Bible, moron. So either you’re a LIAR (my bet) or you don’t realize the actual religion of the house you were in. Yeah. Liar.