Pornography Is Not Education

26.6K posts

Pornography Is Not Education banner
Pornography Is Not Education

Pornography Is Not Education

@CCSDConvo

What's behind your child's school library password?

USA Katılım Şubat 2017
903 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Pornography Is Not Education
AI Chatbots are advertised to school children in popular Ed-Tech nationwide disguised as "scholastic" content - including ads and retail links for Juicy Chat and other NSFW Chat. Parents and teachers must be increasingly on guard.
The Institute for Family Studies@FamStudies

🤖 AI chatbot toys are vying for more time spent on device and manipulating children who don’t have the cognitive ability to understand what is happening.

English
0
1
3
3.4K
Pornography Is Not Education retweetledi
Ethan Brooks
Ethan Brooks@alt_w_v_g·
Downloaded an app this morning It asked me to accept the terms and conditions 197 pages I read them Because that's what I do By page 12 I'd granted them an irrevocable, perpetual, royalty-free license to my data That's the same language I see in contracts worth more than my house For a free app By page 41 I'd agreed to resolve all disputes through binding arbitration in the state of Delaware I've never been to Delaware No jury trial No class action No discovery process They gave themselves more legal protection than most Fortune 500 vendor agreements I've reviewed By page 87 they'd reserved the right to modify the agreement at any time without notice So I agreed to terms that can change after I agreed to them I've reviewed contracts with better reps and warranties than this By page 134 they could terminate my account at their sole discretion with no obligation to refund anything Unilateral termination with no cure period My board doesn't even have that No one reads this They designed it that way 197 pages for an app that tracks my water intake I've signed deals with shorter contracts My wife asked why I've been staring at my phone for two hours I said "a contract disguised as a checkbox" She looked at the ceiling Make common sense common again Sent from my iPhone
English
251
1.8K
11.6K
250.7K
Pornography Is Not Education
and it's advertised - below the radar in "scholastic" resources - to kids who are just doing homework
Richard V. Reeves@RichardvReeves

If pornography isn't something many people are willing to talk about openly, we are missing a huge part of the conversation about what’s impacting our young men and boys. I'm grateful that @oso and the team at @aibm_org are undertaking this crucial responsibility by beginning rigorous research on pornography and its effects on young men.

English
0
0
1
51
Reem Ibrahim
Reem Ibrahim@ReemAmirIbrahim·
Here's a step-by-step guide on how to block social media from your child's phone: Firstly, you want to stop your child from being able to download any app without your permission: 1. Go to Settings, Screen Time 2. Turn on Content & Privacy Restrictions 3. Go to iTunes & App Store Purchases 4. Tap Installing Apps 5. Select Don't Allow Secondly, you want to stop your child from accessing social media on the browser: 1. Go to Settings, Screen Time, Content & Privacy Restrictions 2. Tap App Store, Media, Web, & Games 3. Tap Web Content 4. Under Never Allow, tap Add Website 5. Add social media sites (eg. instagram.com) You can also go to Screen Time → See All Activity → Scroll down to Websites to monitor what sites your child visits, and the time spent on each site. Tech companies have made it so easy! We don't need the Government to parent our children.
English
41
72
208
8.4K
Pornography Is Not Education
@Heritage School safety requires dealing with the undisclosed (adult and illegal) ads buried in subscription "scholastic" research tools. The time is now.
English
0
0
0
11
Heritage Foundation
Heritage Foundation@Heritage·
BACKGROUNDER: As policymakers consider AI in education, they must take seriously the risk profiles and research on harms to children from addictive design features. heritage.org/education/repo…
English
8
4
11
2.5K
Pornography Is Not Education
"The distance between our current cultural trajectory and what is happening in China is not a difference in kind. It is a difference in degree. And the degree is closing..." Mass Murder for Organs: How China Built a Kill-to-Order Industry open.substack.com/pub/drmcfillin…
English
0
0
0
31
Fairplay
Fairplay@fairplayforkids·
✍️STATEMENT: The courts have ruled. Now it's time for Congress to act. Meta & YouTube have been found negligent in a landmark #socialmediatrial. But to proactively protect kids, we need to change how these companies design their products. Congress MUST pass the Senate's #KidsOnlineSafetyAct. Read our statement! 👇
Fairplay tweet media
English
4
3
6
255
Reem Ibrahim
Reem Ibrahim@ReemAmirIbrahim·
Should gambling addicts sue casinos? Should overeaters sue supermarkets? Obviously not! So why are social media companies being sued? We're entering a world where companies that create something other people actually want are at risk of being sued, banned, or heavily regulated.
English
469
72
575
74.1K
Pornography Is Not Education retweetledi
National Center on Sexual Exploitation
BREAKING! Keep the victories coming! A California jury just delivered a major blow to Big Tech. Meta and YouTube have been found negligent in a landmark trial, with jurors agreeing their platforms were designed in ways that harmed young users and failed to adequately warn about the risks. This is HUGE, it chips away at the long-standing immunity Big Tech has relied on and signals a turning point for accountability. Children’s safety > corporate profit. It’s time for real reform, and justice finally being served... buff.ly/cI1GuT8 #HoldBigTechAccountable #Meta #YouTube #MarkZuckerberg #BigTech #California #SocialMediaTrial #KGM #NCOSE #EndExpliotation @WSJ
English
4
9
22
799
Nico Perrino
Nico Perrino@NicoPerrino·
I'm concerned about this verdict and the overall trend of treating speech platforms as addictive — and therefore dangerous — products. Also, the verdict diminishes the responsibility parents have to raise healthy kids. For example: "Kaley says she began using YouTube at age 6 and Instagram at age 9 and told the jury she was on social media 'all day long' as a child." Where were the parents?
The Associated Press@AP

BREAKING: A jury in Los Angeles finds Instagram and YouTube liable in a landmark social media addiction trial. apnews.com/article/social…

English
203
221
1K
233.5K
Gerald Posner
Gerald Posner@geraldposner·
BREAKING: Tech’s Big Tobacco turning point just happened. A Los Angeles jury just did something no court has done before: it held Meta and Google negligent for how their platforms are designed. Not the content. The systems. Jurors found the companies failed to warn users—specifically children—about risks tied to features like algorithmic recommendations, autoplay, and persistent notifications. This is the first major verdict to treat social media design itself as a potential source of harm. The case centered on a young woman who said years of compulsive use of Instagram and YouTube, beginning in childhood, led to severe mental health consequences, including body dysmorphia, depression, and suicidal ideation. The defense argued her struggles were rooted in prior trauma and that the platforms were not designed to maximize time or addiction. The jury disagreed. This may be the closest thing yet to a “Big Tobacco” turning point for tech—not because of damages alone, but because of the theory of liability. Plaintiffs are increasingly bypassing Section 230 protections by focusing not on user-generated content, but on product design. That shift is important. It opens the door to arguing that engagement systems themselves—recommendation engines, infinite scroll, autoplay—are not neutral tools, but engineered behavioral loops. And courts may now be willing to scrutinize them as such. This verdict won’t stand alone. A federal case involving school districts and families is set for trial this summer. Multiple state actions are ongoing. Some companies have already settled in related cases. Appeals are coming. The legal fight is just beginning. I have covered this case as both a journalist and with my lawyer’s DNA: the direction is now unmistakable: The question is no longer just what users see online. It’s whether the platforms were built in ways that made it hard to look away—and whether that carries legal consequences
English
8
26
83
3.6K
Pornography Is Not Education
"...if a company caused harm through "intentional acts" rather than accidentally, the insurers have no obligation to defend that company..."
Jonathan Haidt@JonHaidt

Karma is finally coming for Meta, through the legal system. As we await a verdict in Los Angeles on whether social media platforms were designed to addict young people, it's important to note that TWO courts have already ruled against Meta in the past month. 1) Yesterday, a jury in New Mexico established that Meta's platforms are not safe for kids, and that their design enabled the exploitation of children. This is a watershed moment: This is the FIRST time a jury has evaluated the evidence. The evidence was so compelling that the jury said Meta should pay $375 million dollars in civil penalties for the harms it has caused to New Mexico and its citizens. See here: theguardian.com/technology/202… 2. But it gets worse for Meta: a few weeks ago, in Delaware, a court ruled that Meta's insurance companies do not have a duty to defend Meta or cover its costs in the thousands of lawsuits playing out in California because, under California law, if a company caused harm through "intentional acts" rather than accidentally, the insurers have no obligation to defend that company. Because the documents brought out in the NM and LA trials show intentional actions, Meta loses insurance coverage. That's what the insurance companies asserted, and the judge agreed with them. See here: insurancejournal.com/magazines/mag-… Because of these two rulings, the legal and political landscape has changed dramatically. Going forward, social media companies will be judged like any other company whose product design decisions harm children. These two rulings mark a profound shift toward accountability. The legal system is beginning to catch up to what parents have known all along. Many parents are now more likely to get justice for what these platforms have been doing to children for many years.

English
0
0
0
67
Pornography Is Not Education
"When you consider that many school therapists think they can boost students’ mental health by talking about racism and colonialist oppression, it’s no wonder these efforts are failing while reading and math scores plummet..." It’s Time For Schools To Get Out Of The Mental Health Business dailywire.com/news/its-time-…
English
1
2
4
187
Pornography Is Not Education retweetledi
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
Socialism relies on the poor To justify its existence So it perpetuates poverty
English
2.7K
15.5K
50.9K
1.7M
Pornography Is Not Education retweetledi
Hillary Hickland
Hillary Hickland@HicklandHillary·
Imagine being kicked out of a school board meeting for reading from books in the school library.
Moms for Liberty-Harris County Texas@M4LHarris

🧵Tonight, myself, Pastor Rick Scarborough, Vanessa Sivadge, and Bonnie Wallace spoke at the Houston ISD Board Meeting to raise awareness about the sexually explicit content available to minors in HISD schools. For those outside of TX, HISD is the largest school district in TX with over 183K students. We each had 1 min to speak. I realized half way through that I was not going to finish my statement, and I had also planned to read from a book called “The Haters”, which is found in 7 HISD High Schools. It is an AWFUL book with 196 F BOMBS! My sweet friend Bonnie Wallace spoke ahead of me, & tried to read aloud from one of the filthy books. She was not allowed to do so by the board, & WAS ESCORTED OUT OF THE MEETING BY POLICE. What an upside down world we live in that we can’t read the filth to a room full of ADULTS, but it’s perfectly fine to put it in front of MINORS WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS. 🤯 I’ll put in the comments my statement that I had planned to read to the HISD Board if given the chance, and the other videos. Bottom line, we MUST take action to protect our children from harmful content whether it’s social media, movies, music or BOOKS! They deserve the BEST literature possible…not filth. And, as I said in my statement to HISD, following the law is a requirement…not a suggestion. ⚖️ @Moms4Liberty @TinaDescovich @V_Sivadge @cslape @mamaknowsbooks @momofnell @M4LHaysCoTx @M4LWilCoTX @Moms4LibertyGC @drbone4tx @2fight4liberty @CMooreFreedom @ShanaSFuller @captivating_21 @OccupyLibraries @TexasEd911 @TxEdStrategies @GregAbbott_TX @KenPaxtonTX @SteveTothTX @realmitchlittle @houston_cf @RAPHOOPTX @libsoftiktok @REVWUTRUTH @Rebecca_LPC @Bentley4Texas @ZebraStrongMama @nicolle99953150 @DeskofMattCone @RealRichardVega @paigered3 @htxkidsfirst @DanPatrick @robbystarbuck @bennyjohnson @kellyske @PriscillaWest77 @JulieABehling @JackPosobiec @QueenAnticommie @RealGemBalboa @SteveLovesAmmo @HonShawnThierry @ManoForTexas @MaryBowdenMD @MoCoAdvocate @Julie4TX @Nelsontiffanyb @HoustonISD

English
5
12
42
2.9K
Pornography Is Not Education
@JonHaidt They also agree that undisclosed advertising (often for gambling, and other adult or illegal things) in digital school resources is unacceptable.
English
0
0
1
98
Pornography Is Not Education
@agustinavcid @NetChoice Commercial school vendors (information aggregators) hide behind Section 230 when they host advertising on behalf of their publishing clients - often for drugs, gambling, alcohol, adult shops and even hard core sites. Section 230 is creating a lot of trouble for America's youth.
English
0
0
0
23
agustina vergara cid
agustina vergara cid@agustinavcid·
@NetChoice put it well today: Section 230 is "a critical legal firewall that prevents the weaponization of liability from crushing American innovation and silencing speech online." It protects platforms' ability to moderate without being buried in lawsuits, and we need it for the internet to function.  netchoice.org/netchoice-enco…
English
2
11
26
738
agustina vergara cid
agustina vergara cid@agustinavcid·
The Senate Commerce Committee is holding a hearing today on the future of Section 230: "Liability or Deniability? Platform Power as Section 230 Turns 30.” Sen. Cruz is wrong about tech companies being monopolies, but he’s right that repealing S230 "might increase censorship.” It will! commerce.senate.gov/2026/3/liabili…
English
1
4
14
560