lionsorcas

@infinity_rain0 @shiningsweu No. And no one is telling them its ok, its just there isnt any discrimination

@CDLDno @shiningsweu Did Jesus tell them adultery was OK?

Pope Leo XIV’s Typical Post-Vatican II Stupidity Let’s go back 2,000 years to Jerusalem. Imagine people saying that God Our Lord Jesus Christ welcomes homosexuals, blesses them, and doesn’t tell them to repent; that Christ said participating in pagan rituals was okay; that it was okay to mingle with sects; or that Christ permitted the Egyptians to choose His disciples. These are only a few examples. Christ didn’t do this; He did the opposite. What on earth is Leo XIV doing? Is he stupid, or what?

@LizzieMarbach Catholics don’t believe baptism “earns” salvation—it’s the ordinary means God uses to give grace (john 3:5). There are protestants who share this same belief such as Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists. And no catholics dont charge. Its in ccc2121 Protestants love to lie

It is worth noting that Catholics believe that baptism is how a person gets saved. Which means that they are charging people money for salvation. 🤯

@BahBahBased @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 And for what? This absolutely has no relevance.

@CDLDno @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 To see if you can answer it

Redeemed Zoomer is actively endangering souls

@BahBahBased @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 Yes, its not taking about biology so what was the point of asking “how much spirit does a body need”?

@CDLDno @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 pneuma means spirit. Its not talking about biological functions

@CovenantReform2 @Allesontiire Stupid. Rev 3:9 Behold, I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie—behold, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you.”

@Allesontiire The self-serving Roman sect does exactly what the second commandment and the early church prohibited.

It seems the Protestants are back on the old Catholic-idolatry kick again. They’re wrong. Here’s why. See the thread below.👇🏻

@ApoloJedi_ People of God are not graven images.

That's not Mary. That's a graven image of a fictional character that Roman Catholics have named Mary. The biblical Mary was saved by grace through faith & like every other Christian should NOT be abnormally extolled as a substitute for Jesus

@5Solas2 Its called historical evidence (if true), stupid

This is not aura, this is creepy paganism.

@truthforsaints @UcheMaryOkoli If there was no catholic church, why is Clement of Rome (95 AD) correcting Corinth from Rome and expecting obedience? And if Scripture is “self-authorizing,” who preserved and recognized the canon you’re using?

@CDLDno @UcheMaryOkoli Again - no Catholic Church (proper noun) which later emerged from the Roman church yet existed just a “catholic” church (adjective) universal believers in Christ eg Antioch Alexandria Jerusalem etc God gave us His infallible wotd - not a group of fallible men. History & scripture

⚜ O Divine Master, You chose to live under the care of St. Joseph, a humble worker, a silent servant, a faithful guardian. Through his example, You sanctified labor, You blessed the work of human hands, You revealed that holiness is found in daily duty. Teach me to work as St. Joseph worked with patience, with diligence, with love, and with complete trust in God. Walk with me in my work, in my struggles and in my quiet moments. Let my work become prayer. Let my efforts become offering. Let my daily life become a path to You. And when my faith is weak, strengthen me. For You are present even when unseen, working silently for my salvation. Amen. 🙏

@matthew_sede Well.. sorry, that is subjective

His Holiness Pope Pius XI explains - the unity which Mike Schmitz claims does not exist does indeed exist. Unity of Faith and government, the Supreme Pontiff teaches, is a note (or Mark) of the Catholic Church.

Mike Schmitz, a proponent of the false Vatican II religion, says that Our Lord’s prayer “that they may be one” is unfulfilled. His Holiness Pope Pius XI explicitly condemns this heretical teaching (see below)

@adelethelaptop You are free to be skeptical of these relics if they are legit or not. But What if these bones are confirmed, doesnt it also serve as evidence to skeptics? This is why prots are so unintelligent, they dont care about possible evidence. We should always keep our history.

It’s curious to me how often Catholics refuse to understand what Protestants are saying. I’m not talking about having to agree, just to comprehend. There are enough “relics” to reconstruct the saints 100 times over. These are not her bones, and they should not be idolized.

@JanetET115 @Aaronaeus Yes. No catholic disagrees with that

@Aaronaeus Christians are called to share the good news of Jesus Christ. Now Mary was very blessed to be used of God to bring the Son of God into the world. But faith is in Christ, not her.

Luther & Calvin both upheld Mary as Theotokos and affirmed her perpetual virginity. Luther even spoke of her sinlessness. If the Reformers held a higher Marian view than many Protestants today… what changed… and why?

@HeavyMissionary @Aaronaeus Wrong. Mary’s perpetual virginity predates any reliance on the Protoevangelium of James. Origen doesn’t cite the Protoevangelium of James as the source of the belief. He reflects an already existing tradition and uses the term “ever-virgin” in his own theological context.

@Aaronaeus The truth came out is why. Are you aware that the perpetual virginity claim stems from a fake document written a an apostle imposter? The protoevangelium of James is the basis. Origen cites it and Hippolytus uses the same language. Nowhere nd no one before mentioned her virginity

@LizzieMarbach Its not a lie. Its a historical fact that the Catholics canonized the bible. They were guided by the HS in regonizing what books are inspired word. You protestants just are in denial because u know the irony you all show and the lack of knowledge as well.

This is why it’s important to fight against the RCC/EO argument that scripture didn’t exist or that no one had any clue what it was prior to the councils. It’s a lie and gives way to other false claims about God’s word. Christians began to recognize scripture vs not scripture almost immediately as these books were written. Yes, there was some debate over a few books, but the overwhelming majority were immediately recognized. Likewise, the overwhelming majority of non-inspired text were immediately recognized as such. Early Christians had a good idea of what God’s word was.

@BahBahBased @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 You are trying break the analogy by redefining “death” instead of engaging what James is comparing James isn’t doing a study on the first biblical usage of the word “death.” It’s using a basic analogy: a body without life is dead, so faith without works is dead.

@CDLDno @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 I never said it wasnt measurable, you did. The first usage of "death" in scripture mr whole bible, does not discuss biological death

@MistyBluefla You are lying because the catholic church doesnt say this at all

The RCC claims that the only way of salvation is through the Catholic church. You don't have to be a Bible scholar to know that this is a lie from the depths of hell! No man, church or denomination can save us ONLY Jesus can! Martin Luther had it right. ~Ephesians 2:8~

@BahBahBased @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 I did answer it with a question, you also are contradicting yourself First it was “how much spirit,” which implies a measurable explanation. Now you say it’s not about biology or measurement at all. the question itself becomes irrelevant

@CDLDno @FFTMime @EnigmaDuck @ThomasDominus2 No. Who said anything about biology? Very telling you cant answer the question.

@GCC317 @edermarinFAJ She is. She is the first who believed in christ

@CDLDno @edermarinFAJ She was NOT the 1st apostle.

De los 27 libros del Nuevo Testamento, María solo se menciona en 5. Aparte de los cuatro Evangelios, únicamente aparece en Hechos de los Apóstoles, donde la gloria y la adoración están dirigidas a Jesucristo, no a ella. 🙌🏼🔥

@Jeremyview @Chi_lady_89 @DrShayPhD You cited verses about correcting error, but ignored the ones about how to do it. Second Epistle to Tim 2:24–25 says the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but correct with gentleness, and Epistle to the Ep 4:15 says to speak the truth in love. Take the bible as a whole

The scripture is right there! The lessons learned from the fallen nations are right there! How we are to treat false religions is right there! You're in denial... You don't believe scriptures warnings and His commands... If you won't believe His word, then you won't believe me. I'm exhausted from you. I leave you with this one thing... Jesus will judge us by what's in our hearts and forgives the truly ignorant. You are no longer ignorant on this subject.. You have seen His commands and You will now be held accountable. 'I didn't know or believe' can not be your excuse. Remember that. Good night

If Rome owns the Bible, then why does the Bible contradict Rome’s doctrines?

@truthforsaints @UcheMaryOkoli That bible was canonized by the catholic church.. And yes, you really did not know what graven images mean. Why did God command Solomon to build statues of Angels in his temple in Kings 6:23–28?

@CDLDno @UcheMaryOkoli Your pagan heroes have removed that verse from their “bibles” altogether so I wouldn’t expect you to know what a “graven image” is. Open up a real Bible, find the real Jesus and repent of your sins. The Roman church will not nor cannot save you or anyone else