GunFront

"If you disagree with him, he tries to prosecute you." Hush, you blathering manipulator; the core investigation of corruption started in 2022 -- UNDER THE BIDEN Admin! Those lead to the conviction of Dana Williamson, your former chief of staff from 2022 to 2024. The current DOJ investigation of you and your wife’s non-profit dealings began in 2025, as a DIRECT RESULT of Whistleblower complaints. There isn’t a thread, not one thin line, of proof connecting Trump to the current investigations. Period! And the latter isn’t my opinion, for those motioning, but that of multiple sources -- reporting outlets not known for favorability toward the Trump Administration. Some listed below for those seeking facts over Newsom fictions... youtu.be/CLBJgGhvEHI?si… sacbee.com/news/politics-… transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/… justice.gov/usao-edca/pr/c… sfchronicle.com/politics/artic… latimes.com/politics/story…

@paramounttactcl @FenixAmmunition Pretty hep management too. When Dianne Feinstein passed away, Fenix ran an ammo sale for Californians in celebration of the event. Special packaging, the works! I and a buddy (FFL) stocked up... It was a beautiful thing!

Support small American 2A businesses like @FenixAmmunition 👇

@Joshua_the_car Oh, that's rich! Citing you as, ahem, propogandist??

I wanted to try a good faith conversation with Elizabeth. It seems her real intent was simply to doxx me, hack my computer, and sell whatever information she collected to her Russian friends

Actually, Joshua, on June 30, 2026 Blake Rohrbacher was brought on by Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (aka, Paul, Weiss) -- a prestigious law firm with global offices. This may account for the Motion to Relieve Counsel because, perhaps (speculatively) the partners want Rohrbacher to work elsewhere. Happens often enough. Additionally, motions to relieve are rather common for various reasons that do not necessarily entail something derogatory.; client no pay, conflict of interest, etc. paulweiss.com/insights/firm-…

Tough week for Candace. Let’s pray for her

"I am beyond shocked that Tyler’s legal team didn’t retain her for consulting..." Hmmmm, perhaps they were aiming to avoid the "My Cousin Vinny" affect. Just sayin. Juuuuust a thought.

@ElciMcguire @paramounttactcl @JennTheProducer I am beyond shocked that Tyler’s legal team didn’t retain her for consulting 🤣🤣🤣 she basically cracked the case!

#CandaceOwens’ conspiracy theories BUSTED! @paramounttactcl @JennTheProducer

Again, soooooo what??? You're picking at issues suited for trial and trying to set argumentation based on what's been litigated thus far, forwarding mis-info and hypotheticals to reach an end conclusion. Our judicial system doesn't work that way, otherwise the presumption of innocence would be a hollow construct. It's not. Not by a very long shot, especially in this particular case. Probable guilt (emphasis on PROBABLE) beyond a reasonable doubt has clearly been established against Tyler. Now we move to trial. And THAT, at long last, is where the probability is tested. Here's a sample of guesswork being forwarded by the likes of Candace, and those like her, after which I'll disengage these exchanges... Most recently Candace forwarded the notion that Tyler had dinner at a steakhouse. Others forwarded the concept, cheered it on even, because the purported timing supported the narrative that Tyler isn't the shooter. In fact, some folk were praising Candy for "breaking the story" -- but did she? Not so fast! In January of this year Fox News Digital broke the EXCLUSIVE about Tyler's steakhouse dinner (link to the story below). This is old news. As for timing (the purported time Tyler is to have been there, based on a credit/debit transaction? Not happeninin! Every merchant in the US that accepts direct card transactions must go through a processing hub, each of which have uber strict provisions again disclosing customer card (credit or debit) purchases lacking a court order. Heeeellloooo? Do you think for one second a guy with a reasonably successful business is going to risk his card processing abilities, to corroborate some online theory? Yet again, noooooooot happenin Capin! As for the claimed "employee" purporting to corroborate the timeline? More bullshit! Anyone swingin dick can dress up in a logo T-shirt of the steakhouse -- employee or not -- and claim whatever. That PROVES nothing! Now all the immediate above, notwithstanding, the FBI already investigated this alleged Robinson dinner and evidently found no merit for further inquiry. Zip, nada, zero!!! Otherwise, it would have been disclosed during the prelim as exculpatory!!!! And THIS ⬆️ is just one example among dozens that could be brought to bear, showing the Candace-crew are believing utter falsities. Not to suggest Candace is outright lying, but she sure the fuck isn't applying any universally understood investigative journalism standards! And her background supports she knows how (Preger U, TPUSA, Daily Wire). Bottom-line, you seem like a nice enough gent. I've taken ample time to SHOW you, you're being deceived! Wake up, already, decern the facts! They are out there if one applies even a smidgen of research. Good luck to you, whatever you decide. foxnews.com/us/one-tyler-r…

@GunFrontx @RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree If you listen to dna expert, Twiggs dna is fresher, less dilluted, less wore away naturally than Tylers on the trigger area. If tyler had the gun, twiggs wouldnt be stronger on trigger than if tyler freshly used the trigger

This is petty. This is malicious. This is only done by somebody who has a very very serious problem with herself people who have no self-esteem or very low self-esteem behave this way. You will not find one single happily married person who loves their life and walks with Christ behaving like this. You just won’t. Because people who are happy do not spend all of their time trying to tear down other people.

So what? DNA applicability and character is a matter for trial. Last week was a prelim, you keep avoiding that issue which may be a source of confusion for you. You've no doubt heard the saying, 'everything comes out in the wash' -- well, THAT is trial. Recognition of soiled garments (or whatever) is the preliminary; 'is there enough dirt on this stuff' to warrant a wash (i.e., trial)?

@GunFrontx @RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree Dont forget Tylers dna had deteriorated on the trigger area more than twiggs. If it was in Tylers possession, how would Tylers dna be older, when if Tyler took it, used it, how would Twiggs dna be the less depricated of the two?

"Defense doesnt have to prove anything. Presumed innocent." It's not that simple. Defense proves up defense theories and/or proffers counterargument(s) -- evidence -- against prosecution matter at time of trial. Moreover, presumed innocence is more applicable to trial -- not necessarily a prelim where not all evidence is required for presentation. Moreover "lies by omission" -- to extent either side suspects or bears proof of which -- are triable matter before a jury (in criminal cases).

@GunFrontx @RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree Defense doesnt have to prove anything. Presumed innocent. State has to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, failing miserably, being intentionally deceptive. Lies by ommission.

"You’re stupid if you need an explanation." Yet, I hadn't asked for "explanation" but rather argumentation supporting your contention. Although, just as suggestively foretold, that doesn't appear within your wheelhouse. ...Sucks to be you, don't it?

@GunFrontx @TruthOverTrend You’re stupid if you need an explanation.

Attorney Baron Coleman told his audience the exact opposite of what the forensic analyst testified under oath. The testimony is clear. The post reversed it. So why are so many people willing to distort clear evidence? When the facts and evidence must be twisted to protect the narrative, that isn’t skepticism. It’s indoctrination. It’s deception. And at this point, you can’t reason someone out of fool’s slop if they love wallowing in it. Watch the testimony for yourself. Then decide who is telling you the truth.

Hmmmm, Troll doesn't know how to... Who'da thunk it?

@TheModerateCase What’s the stereotype, moderate?

Stereotypes are in many cases a result of the actions of a few bad apples. You are one of those apples, Kenny.

NOT TRUE, other than continued reality distortions. Fox News Digital covered Robinson's steakhouse visit back in January of this year and even pointed out the eatery owner, informed the FBI. Here, read for yourself... foxnews.com/us/one-tyler-r…

@FenixAmmunition Please, stop making so much sense... Candace-crew heads may start to combust. Yikes!

These are the same people 'combing through' thousands of hours of podcasts to find every discrepancy between every story told by every single person that knew Charlie Kirk's first name. They expect perfection from one side and offer eternal forgiveness to their own.

"Also stupid analogy." How so? Argue merits of your contention, if coherence allows. Can't do that? Cool. Better you STFU, rather than demonstrate conclusively how much you DON'T know! Ok, thanks, Sport. Bye.

@GunFrontx @TruthOverTrend That’s fine we can agree to disagree. At least he can admit he’s wrong. Most people double down. Also stupid analogy.

For the umpteenth time, so what if Benny Johnson was asked to report what went on in court?? Moreover, HiDef imaging is highly compressed upon streaming, whereas in person it would convey far more detail. You assume Johnson lied. Albeit there were far and away more who reported the same, than not. And they were there, in the courtroom! Your contention is flawed.

@GunFrontx Why again was Benny Thompson told to tell the reporters they saw such a clear verson of tyler on the roof, when the prosecuter left laptop open and the "high def clear version" was the same bad quality blurred version that already existed? Why lie and try direct a false narrative

One courageous lady.

Doesn't matter what part of the trigger assembly or extent Twigg touched the item, he lived in the same household as Robinson. Yet THIS (among other reasons) is why you're confused and are questioning legal minutiae whereas it doesn't matter at this stage how Twigg's DNA got there. Or, for that matter, to what extent. Lance is not the accused, Tyler is! All matter for the trial court and lawyers to defend or prosecute later. Are you beginning to catch the drift here??? (HEEELLLLOOO, knock on computer screen!) You appear to be relying more on talking points than actual fact, substantive objective basis. Real truth isn't obtained that way, my friend, never has and never will. And I'm not suggesting you're a bad person, only one who clearly doesn't understand how constructs are formed. There is a science to it! Speaking of which... Hell! Even Albert Einstein (yeah, THAT guy!) was taken in by his own failure to test a theory he once championed.

@GunFrontx @RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree So the major contributer on the trigger area, gaurd ? trigger? what part? Regardless the major contributers dna was the oldest of the two contributers. Most depreciated, Why again was twiggs dna on the trigger area when the gun was up on the wall? Playing indians?

People can extrapolate whatever they want to suit a narrative, either one they're pitching or that which they've been fed. You're swallowing the latter, hook-line-and-sinker! Last week was a prelim-hearing, NOT the trial. Consequently, not every detail is meant to fit like a glove during prelims; but enough to establish a probability of conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Thus, moving forward to a full trial. The issue of Robinson's father arranging his turn in, IS -- quite demonstrably -- relevant to the probability factor I indicated above. That doesn't mean, in isolation, the kid is guilty; only that his own parent evidently reasoned enough culpability, to act on his information.

@GunFrontx @RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree Remember your self righteous standpoint. And if you were being tried, and the evidence seemed very fishy. Im not pro tyler pro turning point. I even heard someone say. The fact that Tylers dad told him turn himself in, thats proof to them. Did Epstein acr alone like Kash said?

And there you have it; 'what-about-isum' guiding your evaluations rather than objective reason. It's not up to the State's witness to volunteer whatever fodder you seem to be clinging to; it's up to Robinson's defense counsel, to bring the issues on cross. If you don't understand the legal processes at play, how then can you form an accurate conclusion of facts? Here's a clue... Ya can't! So, STOP guessing already!

@GunFrontx @RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree Why is the states witness forgetting to mention one minute they claim the car was tylers, the person they learned that from told them there was a bald guy driving with three others in the car. That would be the honest answer right? The dishonest answer is what they tried

So what? Often those who commit vehicular manslaughter 'apologize' as well, yet the damage inflicted remains. An "I'm sorry" doesn't remotely stem to cure harms already inflicted. Thus, I respectfully disagree.

@GunFrontx @TruthOverTrend Baron already apologized for the mistake

@CJohn99480 @RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree You're delusional. Seriously so! Yet since you wish to drag self-righteous spirituality into the Candace mud-pen, here ya go...

@RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree Candace, these influencers, lying is their native language, just like their father satan, he was a murderer from the start

Ohhhh THAT'S ⬆️too funny... Gotta love, AI! 🤣🤣🤣

@RealCandaceO @DefiyantlyFree You made a good point here, Candy