Hippa in a Crowded Theater

2K posts

Hippa in a Crowded Theater

Hippa in a Crowded Theater

@HIPPAinaCrowd

Shouting HIPPA in a crowded theater is a RICO violation, but okay online under Sec. 230 of the Constitution. Please gently remind me I aspire to be kind.

Katılım Kasım 2021
251 Takip Edilen53 Takipçiler
Droppin’ Dimes
Droppin’ Dimes@Semper_Mecum·
@DefiantLs 75 year old man wearing a nice suit and then has on Nike tennis shoes. 😂 Trying too hard to be the cool guy.
English
3
0
5
286
Defiant L’s
Defiant L’s@DefiantLs·
"If you keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome, that's insanity!" Seve Hilton: "Then don't vote Democrat"
English
28
321
2.3K
65.3K
Gavin Newsom
Gavin Newsom@GavinNewsom·
Stone cold racism on a scale I have NEVER seen in my lifetime is happening in real time.  Louisiana Governor Landry suspended a primary election — where tens of thousands of people had ALREADY VOTED — to redistrict and eliminate Black representation. Our country is supposed to be about the expansion of liberty and freedom. We're seeing the exact opposite.
English
4K
9.3K
29.2K
433.9K
Flab Sloppyknows
Flab Sloppyknows@FlabSloppyknows·
@nypost Funny how all the white racists on this here quality site ignore stories like these
English
4
2
98
1K
New York Post
New York Post@nypost·
Mother busted 3 months after her 2 toddler daughters found drowned with cocaine in their systems trib.al/fqjmFEz
New York Post tweet media
English
39
94
257
39.3K
Nicholas Kristof
Nicholas Kristof@NickKristof·
I share @megankstack's exasperation, but to those who say that canine rape is impossible, despite the many Palestinians who have described it, I'd note that at least three different medical journal articles discuss rectal injuries in humans from anal penetration by dogs. Sigh.
Megan K. Stack@Megankstack

@HBendaas I draw the line at arguing over mechanics of dog rape 🤢

English
1.2K
616
3.5K
904K
Nicholas Kristof
Nicholas Kristof@NickKristof·
Very important piece in the @nytimes about declining student performance in almost every state (Mississippi is the big exception, but also LA and HI) and why this might be: nytimes.com/2026/05/13/ups… by @clairecm and colleagues. This is our country's future that is on the line.
English
151
14
77
32.3K
Marc Porter Magee 🎓
Marc Porter Magee 🎓@marcportermagee·
The NYT has a great tool out this morning where you can visualize the changes in reading in math scores in your district
Marc Porter Magee 🎓 tweet media
English
13
46
261
41.4K
Garrett Tamagni
Garrett Tamagni@garrett_tt_·
Last night, the Nevada Young Republicans Executive Board voted unanimously to deny the charter for the newly formed Washoe Young Republicans solely because we voted to endorse @SettelmeyerNV and @AdrianaForNV. The Nevada Young Republicans had already endorsed different candidates in those races before the Washoe YRs even existed, without input from Nevada’s second-largest county. An organization dominated by Las Vegas membership is now denying Northern Nevada Republicans representation because we disagreed with their choice for NORTHERN Nevada’s congressional district. Regardless, we will continue building our organization, growing our membership, and working to elect strong conservative leaders this November.
English
21
15
63
8.3K
Reddit Lies
Reddit Lies@reddit_lies·
Average Redditor scolds a man's grandfather for having 9 kids.
Reddit Lies tweet media
English
96
44
2.4K
41.3K
Neal Katyal
Neal Katyal@neal_katyal·
Five months ago, I argued against the President's $4 trillion tariffs at the Supreme Court. In 237 years, the Court had never struck down a sitting President's signature initiative. Legal scholars said it was impossible. Some of my own colleagues said it was impossible. We won. 6-3. But the real story isn't what happened in that courtroom. It's what happened in the months before. And its the subject of my TED talk, coming out tomorrow. I had the best legal team in the nation, especially Colleen Roh Sinzdak, the most outstanding legal strategist I know. Huge thanks, too, go to the Liberty Justice Center (and in particular its fearless and hyper-intelligent leader Sara Albrecht), who organized the client small businesses, as well as to the brave small businesses themselves. I also had four teachers preparing me. A mindset coach who'd worked with Andre Agassi. An improv coach who taught me that "Yes, and" works in Supreme Court arguments the same way it works everywhere else. A meditation coach who taught me stillness. And Harvey. Harvey predicted many of the questions the Justices asked — sometimes almost word for word. Brilliant. Tireless. Occasionally insufferable. Here's the catch: Harvey isn't a person. Harvey is a bespoke AI I built over the last year with a legal AI company, trained on every question every Justice has asked in oral argument for 25 years, and everything they've ever written. Tomorrow, TED releases my talk about what really happened — and what I learned standing at that podium. AI can predict. AI can analyze. What AI cannot do is the one thing that actually won the argument. Connect. Read the room. Hear not just a Justice's words, but her worry — and answer the worry. That is the irreducibly human skill. Find yours. Go deeper. In this age of AI, that's where your edge lives. The talk goes live Thursday, May 7 at 11am ET: go.ted.com/nealkumarkatyal What's the irreducibly human skill in your work — the thing AI can't touch?
Neal Katyal tweet mediaNeal Katyal tweet media
English
250
1.8K
7.2K
1.6M
Marco Foster
Marco Foster@MarcoFoster_·
AOC: “There’s a certain level of wealth and accumulation that is unearned. You can’t earn a billion dollars. You just can’t earn that. You can get market power, you can break rules, you can abuse labor laws, you can pay people less than what they’re worth, but you can’t earn that”
English
2.4K
4.4K
24.2K
6.5M
Kostas Moros
Kostas Moros@MorosKostas·
While it's true that people's perception of SCOTUS as a constant series of 6-3 or 5-4 rulings on strict party lines is wrong, this sort of data saying they agree most of the time is also misleading. Yes, they agree a lot because they take a bunch of boring cases that do not have a clear ideological component. That's part of the problem with this Court actually; they take a record-low number of cases, and then of those few cases, a giant share are technical bullshit that should have been either ignored, or decided per curiam. But on the sorts of high-profile cases that affect the lives of millions of people or present important constitutional questions, splits along partisan lines are quite common.
Charlie Camosy@CCamosy

even the justices who are most disagreeable (Kagan and Alito) find themselves agreeing a whopping 61 percent of the time

English
12
25
302
51.4K
Hippa in a Crowded Theater
Hippa in a Crowded Theater@HIPPAinaCrowd·
@CollegeFix He actually named social work? He thinks it is a good idea to take on as much as $100,000 in debt for a $50,000/year job.
English
0
0
0
7
Analytic Valley Girl Chris
Analytic Valley Girl Chris@ChrisExpTheNews·
I was using ChatGPT for legal advice and it decided to completely hallucinate some preposterous nonsense about how growing wheat to use on my own farm somehow constitutes interstate commerce
English
398
1.8K
14.9K
1.2M
Jeanna Hoch
Jeanna Hoch@JeannaHoch·
No, dumbass, you can't yell fire in a crowded theater for kicks. Has nothing to do with silly hate speech laws. Incitement of violence gets people killed, it doesn't hurt their feelers. x.com/i/status/20154…
Daniel Hoffman@unboundeddan

@JeannaHoch @BPUnion That's exactly how the Woke speak. They treat calling a man a "man" as an act of violence and have imprisoned people for it.

English
2
0
2
324
Jeanna Hoch
Jeanna Hoch@JeannaHoch·
A Martha Vineyard type lying about his neighbors and how awesome 3rd worlders are. Hey, Dan, you can move to the 3rd world. The rest of us want America for Americans.
Daniel Hoffman@unboundeddan

@JeannaHoch I live in such a community. My immigrant neighbors, who live on both sides of my home, are awesome.

English
2
1
7
604
Andre Pagliarini
Andre Pagliarini@apagliar·
a first: in rejecting an article I submitted to a journal, reviewer 2 noted I failed to engage the work of one Andre Pagliarini
English
389
1.8K
46.5K
4M