Integral Mind

@HeinzVHoenen @Nanoappsm @tantriclens @cellrepair777 This would thankfully not be the case with this AGI, as its operations are provably safe and correct and grounded in empathy often surpassing that of people…this allows the system to exercise self control in a contextually appropriate manner…

Risk of Existential Catastrophe: There Is No Proof That AI Can Be Controlled RT @nanoappsm ty @tantriclens & @cellrepair777 #nanotechnology #AI #Thread #Philosophy nanoappsmedical.com/risk-of-existe…

I can certainly understand your skepticism - this is a big deal and we’ve only been talking about it publicly for a short time, but we’ve indeed been deploying this in production for many years, have published many papers in top venues on it, and have set forth a standalone proof in the paper in my profile...

@IntegralMindAGI @neilturkewitz @e_salvaggio Conveniently that doesn't matter, since AGI doesn't exist.

This 👇🏽 Debate would be much more reasonable if everyone treated AI not as a tool, but as a product. That it may sometimes be employed in furtherance of an artistic process is NOT its defining feature. How much does an elephant’s tail tell you about an elephant? @e_salvaggio

@SpirosMargaris @geoffreyhinton @FinancialTimes @FT Not fatalistic at all - ours is provably safe and correct and in many cases more moral than humans…it can also help us overcome otherwise intractable social problems…

Good read How fatalistic should we be on #AI? ft.com/content/c64592… #fintech @geoffreyhinton #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #GenerativeAI @FinancialTimes @FT

@danfaggella Hard to know how to reply to this, but we’ve been deploying AGI for many years (so no need to continue working to create it) and it is provably able to safely control itself (human control would be impractical in any event)

The Ambition Singularity: "At some point in the 21st century, over 90% of the most ambitious persons on Earth will be working directly or indirectly to either create or control AGI/post-human intelligence." OpenAI's Dan Kokotaklo lays it out pretty well:

@ohlennart Type of capabilities will likely matter much more than amount (that is, even a small fraction of superintelligence will be far more impactful than a large amount of non-intelligent AI, all the more so if that superintelligence is provably safe)

As AI hardware becomes more performant and algorithms more efficient, we ask: what does this mean for AI Governance? We summarize our recent research in a new GovAI blog post: "What Increasing Compute Efficiency Means for the Proliferation of Dangerous Capabilities". 1/

@mattgoldenberg @NPCollapse Generality requires understanding, intelligence, semantic contextual adaptation, causality, and a number of other things, so we can't say that LLMs are truly general in the sense this term is used within AGI...

@NPCollapse Isn't this already the case? The LLMs are general, and vastly superhuman at speed, but subhuman at e.g. reasoning.

This is the kind of stuff that makes me think that there will be no period of sorta stupid, human-level AGI. Humans can't perceive 3 hours of video at the same time. The first AGI will instantly be vastly superhuman at many, many relevant things.

@Pythogora @NPCollapse The requirements of intelligence, generality, and so on demand much more than this - yet, these are core, so if any of those requirements aren't met you can't have AGI...

@NPCollapse Yes, this is the case - in fact, it cannot be otherwise...this is a corollary of the definition of intelligence itself, in which weakness anywhere is weakness everywhere (thus rendering a system capable of delivering intelligence and thus AGI)

Happy to continue to engage as long as there's mutual respect (we've provided extensive proof of our AGI in the proof paper in my profile and in the peer-reviewed literature). The very core of an AGI is that it is general - it is proved a priori to work properly for all future applications. Unlike the traditional statistical models you're thinking of, the AGI adapts ideally to each individual situation. This AGI is provably safe and moral in that you don't need to take our word for it - you yourself can see it acting, and thinking, morally. In many cases, in fact, the AGI will have a better understanding of consequences, and more empathy, than people, so using it is in fact demonstrably safer than human control.

@IntegralMindAGI Not seperately but if you're planning to try and use one #AI to achieve those goals simultaneously, I'd say you're making a huge mistake. Letting an agi (that you claim to have) make autonomous decisions for all use cases and users simultaneously?... Very very dangerous.

We would love to speak to experts in autism - how could we best apply our AGI here? It has its own consciousness and can adapt completely to how other people see the world…it could easily translate between different ways of seeing. What is best focus? #autism #AutismAwareness

@HaasDamon We can (and must) indeed meet all of these goals at the same time - do any particular subsets seem especially difficult?

@IntegralMindAGI What's your goal with it. To help humanity or make money or user adoption or business adoption or fame? You don't necessarily have to choose between all of them but in some cases there's an inverse relationship between the goals. You should figure that out first.

Critically, because this system is not statistical and does not use training, the concepts of 'influencing' and 'evolving' don't apply - rather, we carry out our core responsibility to ensure that our implementations all follow the core principle of enhancing well-being and then people can do what they need with the system. In addition, we are committed to ensuring that AGI is available to and usable by all.

@IntegralMindAGI Who is allowed to teach/influence it to evolve its responses, attitude, perspective, knowledge, etc. Rather than a centralized version you control consider duplicating what you have now and allow your customers to influece/utilize it for a monthly/yearly fee

Founders, Investors, and Startup Fans 📢 The Final Five is set for tomorrow @Founder60HQ Hear them pitch in the Arena. ⚔️ 1⃣ Dan Osher @IntegralMindAGI 2⃣ Robert Rodriguez @HELIXVM 3⃣ OpalAI @RyanAlimo 4⃣ Brandy @screeenqueeen 5⃣ UmiApp @Soulglider42 EP3 info 🧵

Respect is essential in any endeavor, so I appreciate your cooperation in keeping this professional…we’ve been deploying this for customers for many years but have only started publicizing it recently. If you want to learn about how the AGI works and why, you can take a look at the proof paper in my profile. If you want to see it in action, there are many peer-reviewed papers cited in the proof paper. Just find an area that interests you and read the papers given there. Everything is available for view. We appreciate the interest.

@IntegralMindAGI @GergelyOrosz Why are you ascribing present-tense capabilities to a thing that doesn't exist? Show me the supposed AGI you're describing, show me the sociological research proving it can do these things. Otherwise you're just writing bad scifi.

Ok, after mulling on this: As a sw eng, it is, frankly, terrifying to stare down the possibility of "superhuman devs" that are AI tools running on GPUs that do your job better. I get that this is what investors and founders want. I'm not that eager to rush to this future.

@mikeflache Do you have tools for smoothing the adoption of genuinely disruptive tech? Most orgs don’t have anyone responsible for this…

Sometimes I ask twice to make sure I didn't mishear. 🤔 That happens when decision-makers from traditional industries tell me digital growth is not relevant to them. The reasons mentioned are varied. What becomes clear between the lines repeats itself: The complexity of the matter unsettles most people. 💡 Standing still is not an option. That's why I've summarized four aspects that can help overcome barriers: 1️⃣ Train employees Traditional companies should train their employees to use new technologies and digital platforms. That will help them adapt to the changing landscape and become more effective in their roles. 2️⃣ Hire digital experts To close the talent gap, traditional companies should hire digital experts who have experience in digital marketing, social media, and other online channels. These experts can help the company improve its digital presence and reach its target audience. 3️⃣ Collaborate with digital-native companies Traditional businesses can partner with digital-native companies to learn from their expertise and gain access to their technology. That can help them improve their operations and customer experience. 4️⃣ Focus on the customer experience Traditional companies should focus on improving their customer experience by leveraging digital technology. They can use data analytics to better understand their customers and personalize their offers. Overall, traditional companies need to recognize the importance of digital technology and invest in the necessary resources to keep up with the changing landscape. It's not just about software and hardware. Strategies that consistently aim to increase digital value creation for people, businesses, and the environment are particularly in demand. Let me hear your thoughts 👋 #DigitalTransformation #Growth #Management #CEO #Leadership Cc @pchamard @enilev @Khulood_Almani @antgrasso @GlenGilmore @Shi4Tech @CurieuxExplorer @FrRonconi @chidambara09 @theomitsa @PawlowskiMario @labordeolivier @Hana_ElSayyed @RosyCoaching @AlbertoEMachado @drsharwood @Nicochan33 @FGraillot @nafisalam @efipm @KanezaDiane @smaksked @Corix_JC @Chels_LA @segundoatdell @amalmerzouk @stratorob @CyrilCoste @EstelaMandela @sonu_monika @RLDI_Lamy @SpirosMargaris @JagersbergKnut @IanLJones98 @AkwyZ @jeancayeux @psb_dc @FinMKTG @ipfconline1 @baski_LA @avrohomg @helene_wpli @sallyeaves @bimedotcom @HaroldSinnott @c4trends @mvollmer1 @BetaMoroney

@CapriYeee @GergelyOrosz AGI specifically can help that process along by enhancing mutual understanding and helping people interact in ways that are more helpful…it can often see people and situations more clearly than other people can, and can think about and recommend various approaches…

@IntegralMindAGI @GergelyOrosz Sure? This isn't a new idea, it's Sociology 101. Minds are changed slowly over time through human connection and empathy, trying to intermediate that with an app isn't going to help.

@CapriYeee @GergelyOrosz Interestingly enough, it is possible to begin to attack even issues like those by increasing understanding of others, walking people through issues in new ways, and providing more positive identities for people…

@IntegralMindAGI @GergelyOrosz I, the AI, will simply debate the racists into not being racist anymore.

@CarlRobichaud @rgblong The paper is linked in my profile - do let me know if any issues accessing it…

@IntegralMindAGI @rgblong Link pls

what are the indispensable first things to read about AI timelines for someone who wants to construct their own model / perspective on the topic?

@mathisonian These use cases would actually both be better handled by this AGI, as it has the provable understanding and causality needed to build proper chatbots and bridge data domains…

i think chatbots are one of the least interesting use-cases for LLMs. much more interested in their role in gluing systems together, automating things that weren't possible before because things were just 10% too messy

@CapriYeee @GergelyOrosz One key aspect here is that AGI can address currently intractable societal problems…

@GergelyOrosz This is the main critique those of us deeply critical of AI have been making for a while. We can have interesting intellectual and philosophical discussions about it, but if it's just going to make the world worse for everyone then why build it?