Evola
2.9K posts

Evola
@MemeticPrimer
Decoding viral thought patterns | Mapping the architecture of influence | Your echo chamber is a data point

YouTube deleted my animation channel Bloomation. @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTube My channel had 760,000 subscribers. It was removed for “spam, fraud, and deception policies.” But here’s the problem: I never violated these rules. Bloomation was an animation channel. My videos were Roblox animations, made as original content — characters, editing, scenes, animation work. No spam. No scams. No fraud. Nothing deceptive. And yet my channel is gone. I’ve been without my channel for a month now. YouTube reviewed the case again and rejected my appeal, but I truly believe this review was not handled correctly. How can an original animation channel with manually created videos be treated like spam or fraud? That’s the part I can’t understand. What makes this even worse is that I’m not the only one. Many animators are facing the same thing right now: original channels getting demonetized, removed, or punished by YouTube’s support and automated AI system. These are not scam channels. These are creators. Artists. Animators. People who spent years building their work. A channel can disappear in one moment, and then the only answer we get is basically: “the decision is final.” Is this really how YouTube treats creators now? @TeamYouTube, please take another look at Bloomation. I believe my channel was removed by mistake, and I’m asking for a real human review — not an automated decision that destroys years of work. Please help bring attention to this. A lot of animation creators are being affected, and YouTube needs to notice what is happening. Affected creators: @CCountryz18217 @FairyLabYT @stategirlsyou @BoomLab172561 @SOKALUPEC @ifCurse @ULTRA_GAMERS_ @nick_film76462 @KeidBoi @SacredBricks @LevelLabs2gvb @spectrlabs1011 @EternalMystYT @PBACONMAN3 @mansterzs @TheShadowWork @RottenAges @DeadNetStudios @RayDocsProd

BREAKING: House Democrats Are Gunning For $USAR ‘s Government Deal A senior House Democrat accused U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Thursday of structuring Washington's $1.58 billion investment into USA Rare Earth in a way that gives the government "highly concerning" leverage over the company while boosting Lutnick's family-run investment firm. In a 10-page letter, Representative Zoe Lofgren, the ranking member of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, wrote that the proposed deal would let the Commerce Department keep an equity stake even if it decides not to invest while also leaving the company reliant on a $1.5 billion private capital raise led by Cantor Fitzgerald, the financial firm previously led by Lutnick and now run by his sons. "This deal creates a massive personal conflict by granting the Secretary of Commerce overwhelming leverage to influence the behavior of a private company while positioning him to promote the interests of his sons as a condition of his support," wrote Lofgren, a California Democrat. The company must meet a series of milestones to receive the funding, including raising additional private capital, completing technical studies and demonstrating market demand for its manufacturing plans, according to the filing. Lofgren argues those conditions could leave the company dependent on the discretion of Commerce officials and create the potential for undue influence, especially given that the private capital raise from Cantor Fitzgerald is a condition for finalizing the government investment. "The interplay between the company's vulnerability and your personal conflict is a glaring red flag," Lofgren wrote. reuters.com/business/us-ho…






Stare at a wall until everyday life becomes enjoyable again.


Testosterone supplementation erased the audience effect in male generosity. Men on placebo became more prosocial when watched; testosterone-treated men did not. In other words: they didn’t let an audience dictate their behaviour.

Heard this in AA years before I realized it was wu wei: “It's easier to act your way into new ways of thinking than it is to think your way into new ways of acting.”














