Paberihunt 🇪🇪 🇺🇦

@mert It sort of tells the story of believers who spread them. They assume that the elite’s competence is so high it allows them to control the world without a hitch They’re not wrong in elite being smarter - it’s just amusing how it subtly reveals their awareness of own inferiority

my biggest problem with conspiracy theories is that they assume governments are competent

@TheExtremeMusi1 Animals is much more inviting to put on. I generally try to avoid The Wall, I even don’t like it much musically (apart from few Gilmour solos) and I literally hate Roger Waters. The reason I avoid it is that it sticks like a glue and lives in my head rent-free Hence, The Wall 😬

Settle a bet for me. The Wall or Animals ???

@paivootele @KhaterDiana Very Japan-esque, pragmatic and polite

@KhaterDiana It's OK - we almost never use that power plant anyway. Likely many of us feel rather sorry it prevented your drone hitting Ust-Luga.

Dear Estonians and Latvians, we are really sorry if our drones that were targeting russian ports reached you. It was never our intention to cause any harm to you. You are one of the mosts supportive people in this world we would never do such a thing to intentionally.

@TheFl0orIsLaVa He does look like as if he’s been hit by KamAZ recently

Another "take" from Dmitry Medvedev that reads like it was typed with one eye closed.

@buckdaddyx @DonAlt @DonCryptoDraper Oh, so electing Trump was somehow going to remedy all that? Congrats, things just got exponentially worse since then

@DonAlt @DonCryptoDraper You don’t live in America You don’t understand what actually has happened these past few years and what type of people are living in our country now because of it x.com/nypost/status/…

If you've ever wondered what happens if you put a retard in power and remove all ways to keep him in check

@Crchrth @crystalclearies Mulle korraks 10a tagasi tundus, et uus lootustandev põlvkond kasvab peale, kes tarbib teadlikult ja eetiliselt, mõistliku jalajäljega, pmst koristab eelnevate põlvede sitta. Vist mitte 😅 Eks elukallidus paneb asja paika - kui hind on odav, tellitakse kasvõi vanakuradilt endalt

@crystalclearies Ja mõelda vaid mis töötingimusted valmistajail on 🥰

mind paneb imestama, et temust tellitud kott on nii mugav ja hea. head ja targalt tehtud sahtlid, mingi vaht sees, et püsiks püsti ja oleks mugav, 2 joogikohta jne. ma eeldasin, et enshittification on sinna ka juba ammu jõudnud. ja EMA TELLIS tal on temu haigus prgu

Russia's oil/gas export facilities at Ust-Luga near St Petersburg now burning for the second consecutive day, with Reuters reporting that that 40% of Russia's total exports are now offline. No matter the extent to which Trump tries to save Putin, Russia is now Zelensky's bitch.

@EestiNokiaAS @martinsepp Kle - oled vist Eesti elust võõrdunud. Orbani, Fico, Weideli stiilis väiklusele pole siin väga kandepinda, ürita mujal

@ercwl @AlgodTrading Have you seen what @cass_on_mars is building? Really curious if you have an opinion on Q tech x.com/quilibriuminc/…

@AlgodTrading These things cannot fundamentally exist without decentralized verification, aka zkML. Unless you’re counting TEEs as decentralized alternatives, I guess.

Keep in mind that my Bittensor $TAO review was focused on a single subnet two years ago. Yes, then it was shit. And yes, all the other subnets were shit aswell. Also, back then, the idea itself (that you could use consensus networks to e.g. verify inference or anything else of value mathematically and incentivize/prove/reward subnet miner behavior) was tenuous at best. zkML *is* becoming more practical. Still not practical, but becoming more so. Before you reference this takedown, I need to do a new review of current subnets, like Templar/Targon/Ridges/Chutes and establish whether they’re doing anything interesting, and that the Bittensor incentivization mechanism provides irreplaceable value-add other than just subsidizing costs. The fact that you can subsidize AI projects and achieve things as a subnet using the TAO emission subsidization is confusing for people for two reasons: * For onlookers from the outside, it can look like ”Oh, they did X in subnet Y? That’s impressive!” and that may be a valid takeaway * For other onlookers (with more skepticism) it will be a question whether the orchestration mechanism and verification mechanism Bittensor provides actually contributed anything, or if this was just retail speculators/bagholders subsidizing some AI thingamajig and the thingamajig wasn’t useless That’s why the achievements of subnets can be both impressive and unimpressive at the same time. As a more overarching question about all this, it’s about whether AI thematically is so important that it will *force* a marriage between AI projects and crypto liquidity, and that crypto will facilitate useful bootstrapping this way. *That*, I think will happen, and therefore it may be a mistake to chain yourself to the chariot of Bittensor’s demise.

@ua_antifas @TheFl0orIsLaVa @IlvesToomas @MykhailoRohoza At this point I’m entirely convinced that a small part of 🇷🇺 troll farm is specialized in posing as pro-Ukraine, in order to stir confrontation with 🇺🇦 supporters in Baltic states

@TheFl0orIsLaVa @IlvesToomas @MykhailoRohoza Dying for Ukrainians isn't reasonable. I got it. Thanks.

An attack on the Baltic countries is вполне real, and here’s why. There are at least THREE reasons for such a move. The first and main one: Russia risks NOTHING. No matter how events unfold with the occupation of the Baltic states, Russia will not end up worse off. Sanctions are already in place. Europe is no longer buying its oil products and gas. Weapons are being supplied to Ukraine anyway. From a purely military standpoint, Russia also risks nothing. It has nuclear weapons, so if it succeeds and occupies the Baltics or parts of them, no one will be able to push it out. And if it loses, it won’t lose its own territory—it will simply retreat back to its borders, and NATO will not invade Russian territory because of those same nuclear weapons. So why not try? The second reason lies in the broader war aims. The goals of the Russian Federation go far beyond occupying the Baltics. First and foremost, Russia is interested in the collapse of NATO and the EU. From this perspective, any territorial gain in the Baltics would count as a victory. Even if Russia does not capture Vilnius or Tallinn, but only a few border villages, it would still be seen as a victory, because it would demonstrate NATO’s inability to protect its members. So again—why not try? The third reason: Russia has sufficient forces and resources in the potential conflict zone to accomplish military objectives and achieve an acceptable outcome. In the Leningrad Military District, there is a combat-ready grouping of about 70,000 troops, which can easily be reinforced with reserves from the Ukrainian front. This force is mechanized, with around 700 tanks and a large amount of armored vehicles. Separately, it’s worth noting the drone component, which has no real equivalent in NATO and could radically shift the balance of power in the event of an invasion. If the forces are sufficient—then why not try? As of now, the situation looks like this: Russia has enough capabilities to pursue its objectives in the Baltics and faces no clearly bad сценарии under any development of events. The situation is very similar to the one before the invasion of Ukraine—especially considering the recently introduced law allowing Putin to “protect Russians abroad.” The Baltic countries have helped us more than anyone else, and I sincerely wish our friends never face war. But to preserve peace, one must prepare for a major war. And it is very good that our Baltic friends have learned from Ukraine’s mistakes and have built defensive lines and fortifications to repel any invasion. I truly hope that the Russian Federation will break its teeth on the Baltics just as it did on Ukraine.

Many people started posting alarming content implying that Russia was preparing to attack Estonia and implement the Crimea and Donbas scenario in Narva. President @IlvesToomas was actively explaining how nonsensical this is. A thread.🧵 1/9

Putin has survived wars, elections, Navalny, mobilizations, and an increasingly shitty economy. The most gen-Z thing would be for the Russians to bring him down because he messed up their ability to surf porn sites.

@inversebrah Raising the cost for Muricans. Ultimately no need, Muricans are blowing themselves up

discuss

@KateGoesTech @soren2point0 @funkatronas You really are 🇷🇺 troll, aren’t ya What posts like these will do: - spook investors - damage economies - less funds, less supporting 🇺🇦 - turn public opinion against 🇺🇦 You’re as stupid as Trump if you think there’s anything for 🇺🇦 to gain from spreading these made-up stories

@soren2point0 @funkatronas Get fucked mate Eastern European states need to realise they should get off their asses and help Ukrainians to defeat 🇷🇺 in 🇺🇦 before Putin comes to them Ofc you’d prefer to see all lovely brave Ukrainians dying first before you decide to check the NATO protection theory

Won't be surprised if Baltic states suddenly “stop meeting NATO membership standards” in the nearest months 🙃

I can't believe the flood of silly analyses on X about this virtual "Narva People's Republic." If this trend continues, journalists / commentators will effectively orchestrate the secession themselves, annex Narva to Russia, and subsequently ponder how to reverse it. The fairy tale about separatism in Narva and all sorts of "people's republics" in the Baltic states is just a way to get attention/clicks. Virtual "people's republics" online have been popping up since the start of the previous decade. They've already targeted Latvia, Estonia, and there was even a "Vilnius People's Republic" run in Polish. Did any of them come true? NO! The vast majority of these "people's republic" news stories are written by journalists who don't know the local context of Russian-speaking communities in Latvia or Estonia. Okay, but what about these internet separatists this time? Since this "scandal" blew up, the "people's republic"'s online reach has grown from a few dozen subscribers to 500. I'll bet most of the followers who joined last week are people interested in the group for professional reasons. Today's Postimees edition published an investigation into the online phenomenon of the "Narva People's Republic," which suggests there are only two active supporters of separatism in Estonia :) The journalists joined the inner circle of internet separatists. As it turned out, in that circle besides the channel owner, there were just two others: a port worker from Sillamäe and one potential "fighter" from Tallinn. The Sillamäe port worker was the Postimees journalists, and the "fighter" from Tallinn, according to the authors, is probably a journalist from a competing paper or a KaPo officer. Unfortunately, these sensational stories harm Estonia's image.

@jerald @DeItaone Now swap the ayatollah with Putin and the EU with the US, works perfectly

Such fake humanitarians. They talk about how bad dictators are but never life a finger to do anything. Now, when Iran's ayatollahs are at their weakest EU FEIGNS. THIS IS WEAK LEADERSHIP. Evil wins when the good do nothing. EU chooses to do nothing. Goddamn morons, their bullshit rules and we're the good guys talk is all smoke and mirrors.

EU'S KALLAS: THIS IS NOT EUROPE'S WAR

Share a 10/10 album, a no skip trip👇🏻 I’ll start:

@AlgodTrading @Overdose_AI x.com/yogurt_boy_123…

@Overdose_AI Imagine a token that tackles the AI privacy part

I DCA in $TAO because it's currently the biggest AI token during the biggest AI bubble in modern history I DCA in $XMR because it's the strongest and most widely used privacy coin - in a world where privacy doesn't exist anymore. The more this world gets fked up - the more ppl will need privacy

@KJarvan @martenkokk Püha küünilisust. Ja ma omast arust ei rääkinud sõnagi rahastamisest, päris hea teflonrefleks. Aga hea küll, las ta jääda

@MihkelAB @martenkokk Püha naiivsust. Demokraatlik õigusriik on vundament, millel kõik Eesti Vabariigi pikaajalised huvid rajanevad. Üksik infraprojekt on kõrvaline teema. Ten-t võrgustiku rahastamisest teil teadmised puuduvad kategoorilises astmes

Mäletan veel aegu, kus kantslerid ei olnud poliitiliste arvamusartiklite autorid arvamus.delfi.ee/artikkel/12044…

@KJarvan @martenkokk Probleem on liigne politiseerimine ohtlikul ja sõdaderohkel ajal, kui seda va ühtsust rohkem vaja oleks. Tahate noppida poliitpunkte lühiajalise kasu eesmärgil, mis õõnestavad pikemas plaanis 🇪🇪 huve Või siis on tõesti panus sellele, et EU ja TEN-T ühel hetkel lakkavad olemast

@MihkelAB @martenkokk Te ilmselgelt ei adu, milles probleem on