Andrea Anderson

47.8K posts

Andrea Anderson banner
Andrea Anderson

Andrea Anderson

@aander1987

National advocate for patients, clinicians, research & scientists… all who are involved in living with, treating, or researching chronic/persistent pain.

Katılım Mart 2012
4.5K Takip Edilen6.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
1. My #RealPainStory: in 2006, I jumped down a mountainside to stop a child from going over a cliff. I herniated a few discs. 6 months later, a neurosurgeon confused me with a different patient, & cut out the back of my lumbar spine. That plunged me into my first 15 years of pain
English
55
84
250
0
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
I get it—this might be a total waste of time. You never let me forget that. I’ve been grinding federal dockets for years. But sometimes it actually moves the needle, and for more reasons than are obvious. Congress just reauthorized hundreds of millions for pain research. The very organization that got decimated by its own irrelevance and cronyism is now asking us where we want that money to go. We’d be fools not to speak up. This is the best opportunity we’ve had in over twenty years to talk directly to the NIH about real pain research issues instead of just griping online repeatedly. By law, they have to analyze every response by topic and theme. If we stay silent, we’re basically handing them an excuse do nothing. Thus, we will all share the blame when nothing that matters to us gets funded. Even better, they have to publish what we prioritize. That gives us something concrete to take to legislators and policymakers—real numbers, real voices, real priorities. It carries way more weight than one if us walking into an office and saying “this is a problem.” It brings proof, clarification, and evidence. This is critical in advocacy work. Personal story: I talked with the Mississippi Governor in 2018 I was the executive director of ATIP.? I laid out the damages to his constituents from forced opioid tapering. He replied, “This is the first I’m hearing about it. Bring me ten or fifteen people from my state who’ll back you up and I’ll act.” So I reached out to every pain group in the state—organized ones with boards and missions, disease-specific groups you’d think would jump at the chance. I offered to drive, rent cars, arrange carpools, write statements, do the talking—whatever it took. All I needed was ten to fifteen people to show up and confirm what I was saying. How many people do you think responded and offered to show up, back me up, speak up, and represent? Zero. Not one person. Yet we are all online everyday for hours, but when it was time to actually do something? Nothing. I couldn’t deliver, so the meeting never happened. No validation, no action. This is because griping online masquerades as advocacy. It makes us believe we’ve done something when we haven’t done anything. But here’s an opportunity to do something that will be counted and might have an impact. So do it. That’s the only proper response. If we never use the channels that are opened to us, we will get nothing. We might still get nothing. But there’s one guaranteed way to make sure of it: do nothing. I’m willing to organize, coordinate responses, and pull in as many people as possible. Because the only thing that works in politics (besides money) is numbers—ans while we might not have millions to spend, this is something every single one of us can do, no matter how sick, broke, or exhausted we are. I hope you all take the time to write a response. Tomorrow, I will write some examples that you can use and drop into the docket space if you’re not sure what to say. You can use all or part of it or write your own. Just show up,and say something!to so,some who can do so,thing about heat we’ve said.
English
0
0
1
7
Andrea Anderson retweetledi
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
FYI: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) currently has a Request for Information up in which they are receiving public comments (until May 26th) to help shape the research priorities and strategy for NIH for 2027-2031: Request For Information
English
3
4
4
93
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
@Impact2HEAL Thank you, Tamera. I’m working on a list those who would like some, ideas from can use. If you’d like to collaborate, lmk. I have a first draft done but that’s all for right now.
English
0
0
0
9
Chad D. Kollas, MD (he/him)
The amazing Jane Ballantyne who failed to report that she had entered into a contract to serve as a plaintiff expert witness against opioid manufacturers as a conflict of interest while creating the 2016 CDC Opioid Guideline, thereby violating federal law? pallimed.org/2022/09/undisc…
English
1
15
20
384
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
@Bisby2610 I’m sorry you’re still under treated. Hope is everything, isn’t it? .th for your kindness towards mine, and same for you!
English
0
0
1
4
Audrey29
Audrey29@Bisby2610·
@aander1987 I’m really sorry you’re still struggling so much with the electrical injury. Even with a great doctor, I know it must be painful every single day. You’ve shown generosity through all of it. Please know I’m holding you in my thoughts. I am still undertrearted, but am hopeful.
English
1
0
1
48
Audrey29
Audrey29@Bisby2610·
OMG, I am so sorry that you had to go through this. Thank you for sharing. Researching and standing up to medical staff can save a loved one. Kind regards to you, your sweet boy and your family.
Andrea Anderson@aander1987

Anchoring bias nearly killed our son, whose initial diagnosis of reflux carried on through every specialist, each presuming the other had read his test results and therefor must have ruled out other causes. He was even scheduled for a fundoplication surgery to treat his reflux (which was internal and not projectile). But his test results, a suck and swallow with Gi follow through, done at 3 weeks of age, reported his multiple cardiac defects. But the bottom line said “reflux was prevents and his doctor signed off and filed it in his chart (still paper at that time). He never read the multiple alarming internal report and thus missed by his first doctor, and each subsequent specialists I consulted, begging for help as he was dying in my arms, got worse and worse. The head of pediatric GI medicine at Hermann Hospital in Houston told me to take him off all reflux meds, give him rice cereal and for me to take Prozac. All this time, our son was dying of a severe coarctation of the aorta, a patent ductus arteriosus, which was the only thing that kept a small supply of blood to his limbs, but it was closing off and dying. His lungs, liver, and abdomen were filled with blood, suffocating his heart from the inside, causing congestive heart failure. He could not eat and breathe at the same time. It was only me, insisting on getting his entire chart faxed to my kitchen, so I could document his falling on the growth chart to the 3rd percentile, that allowed me to read the test results done with those first tests, which showed numerous cardiac abnormalities and cardiomegaly. His ejection fraction was less than 7, which is barely quivering. His BP to his head was over 200, where to his limbs it was zero. When I read these reports, sitting at my kitchen table, 5 months later, we rushed him to the children’s hospital, where I was told to take him home and “bring him back if he turned blue or stopped breathing,” because there were no echo techs in the hospital at that time. I refused to leave. When he was finally seen at 7 am, suddenly tens of cardiologists rushed him to the PICU. He was so ill they tried to get the fluid off his body but could not, and surgery had to be undergone even though he was so ill. His surgery had a 30 minute limit, they finished in 27. Dr. Debakey’s son in law, Dr. Charles Fraser, did the surgery. Our son is now a thriving adult. But if I had not read his files, if I had given him the Propulsid medication for reflux that killed every baby who had underlying cardiac issues, he would have died within the previous 24 hours. All this was due to anchoring bias - no one looked past his reflux diagnosis to guess “what else could this be?” Even though he was retracting, grunting on every expiration, sweating out of the top of his head, and various other signs of cardiac failure . If *anyone* had even taken pulses on all four limbs, or BP on each limb, the diagnosis would have been easily made. Here’s what I learned: many children with underlying cardiac defects will present with reflux, because their G.I. system is not oxygenated. I share this as a warning to any other clinicians to take reflux seriously and rule out all cardiac issues. We just saved a baby who was sent home with the same diagnosis, but actually had different, but equally severe, cardiac defects. We encouraged the family to pursue cardiac testing, which showed he was also dying of congenital heart defects.

English
1
0
1
68
Chad D. Kollas, MD (he/him)
I prescribed transdermal buprenorphine for a patient with severe cancer pain, but her @Walgreens pharmacist wouldn't fill it because "it's for addiction, not pain." 🤦🏼‍♂️
Chad D. Kollas, MD (he/him) tweet media
English
48
23
177
6K
Andrea Anderson retweetledi
Dr. Heidi Klessig
Dr. Heidi Klessig@heidiklessigmd·
In his book “The Undead,” science writer Dick Teresi exposed the fact that brain death is not death. Here’s how he answered an interviewer’s question about whether better protocols would fix this: “Not really. It’s true that as much as 65 percent of brain death exams are done incorrectly, and many doctors could not list the criteria for brain death correctly. Doctors I talked to said not to worry about patients moving about on the table or their blood pressure or heart rate spiking during harvest. These were just post-death reflexes, not an indication of pain or awareness. And yet the Harvard Criteria, the ur-text of brain death published in 1968, specifically state that there should be no reflexes and no movement. But the bigger problem is that brain death as death per se is a fiction. There is no scientific purpose for brain death. It’s a serious, serious kind of coma, but not death. It was made death for practical reasons. The heart of a brain-dead person still beats, and circulates blood to the organs, keeping them fresh for their future owners. And though the 1981 UDDA (Uniform Determination of Death Act) states that the “whole brain” must be dead, the whole brain is rarely tested. Usually, only activity in the brain stem is tested, not the cortex or higher structures of the brain, where consciousness, pain, and pleasure are interpreted.” When asked whether this was a conspiracy between the transplant community and those who determine when a patient is dead, Teresi answered: “Conspiracy is such a harsh word. Let’s say there’s a happy confluence of coincidences that results in $27 billion of revenue per year (in 2012) for the transplant business and incomes unheard of in other medical specialties.”
Dr. Heidi Klessig tweet media
English
14
123
268
14.4K
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
@Bisby2610 Thank you for the wonderful encouragement. It means so much to me to hear this from you. I have a new treatment plan I’m going to try at the beginning of June - so I’ll let you know if it helps!
English
0
0
0
6
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
@GeorgeD72865991 Agreed. But it is also scary to think of what happens in jury rooms when they ignore legal instructions, use personal beliefs or experiences as opposed to the law, and go with their “vibes“ or Hulu-based narratives.
English
0
0
0
14
George Danton
George Danton@GeorgeD72865991·
@aander1987 It’s probably good that more people are questioning judge’s instructions. The anti-opioid narrative has polluted minds of judges, prosecutors and the public.
English
1
0
1
15
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
That’s so kind of you to say. I’m so glad our conversations helped you obtain better care and ongoing relief. Thank you for letting me know - this is the true blessing of the work in which we persevere. I’m still working on my own care - I have a great physician but my electrical injury is still.p very difficult to treat.
English
1
0
0
24
Audrey29
Audrey29@Bisby2610·
@aander1987 I don't reach out and help people the way you do, but I have so much respect for your work. The coaching you gave me (via X) on how to speak to my doctor was invaluable—it’s the reason I’ve been able to secure better care and relief (ongoing). You=mentor! How about yourself?
English
1
0
1
69
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
@SaraCarterONDCP @Surgeon_General Thank you for this. We definitely need the DEA/DOJ to protect us. You know what the government could actually protect its citizens is stop the mass surveillance used against us through phones, but this is not an action they will take - because it benefits them.
English
0
0
1
5
Sara Carter
Sara Carter@SaraCarterONDCP·
@Surgeon_General As drug czar, this epidemic is concerning. So many lives are being decimated by addiction. I will be directing the DEA to emergency schedule phones under the Controlled Substances Act.
English
1
0
3
290
U.S. Surgeon General
U.S. Surgeon General@Surgeon_General·
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Surgeon General today released the Surgeon General’s Warning on the Harms of Screen Use: An Advisory and Toolkit on How to Protect Children and Adolescents, which raises national awareness about the growing risks associated with excessive and harmful screen use among young people.
U.S. Surgeon General tweet media
English
36
143
457
53.2K
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
The “processed food” mass tort litigation, which is upcoming, is going to use the same strategy. Look for a government document that supports the litigation narrative - it should be produced fairly soon and will support the lawsuits against food manufacturers for a concept that is still undefined.
English
0
0
0
4
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson@aander1987·
This is yet another of how mass tort law uses government agencies to produce evidence of “harms” - usually poorly evidenced based - in order to win billions in exploitation of industry. Another excellent example is the “CDC guidelines for the use of opioids in treating chronic pain“ which was generated by individuals who were expert witnesses on the side of the plaintiff. It had nothing to do with treating chronic pain and the evidence used to make its recommendations were of the poorest quality. But it was cited by mass to litigators to extort close to $80 billion so far from industry. This is a similar example-this recommendation will be used to support the social media mass to litigation again, mass attorneys suing, deep pocketed defendants, accusing them of creating an “addictive product“ as if we have no agency or the ability to make decisions for ourselves. This issue always comes down to freedom vs. safety. Manufacturers make products. Consumers make decisions about using their products. Are manufacturers responsible for our decisions about how we se their products? Or are we responsible for our decisions about using their products whether it’s alcohol, breast implants, tobacco, opioids, and every other product that’s being accused of addiction I think there are 770,000 mass tour cases pending right now. It’s a very lucrative in industry. Do we want the government controlling, through its public/ private partnerships with mass tort law firms, what products we can utilize, buy, or own? Have we lost all of our own agency? Do we need the government to continuously make rulings about our use of products? These should be ours. We are responsible to exercise self control, and temperance with regard to products available on the market. And the argument about young people? Being responsible for their use of social media is the job of parents, not government.
English
1
0
0
11
Chairman Mör Agonistos 🇦🇶
Chairman Mör Agonistos 🇦🇶 tweet mediaChairman Mör Agonistos 🇦🇶 tweet mediaChairman Mör Agonistos 🇦🇶 tweet media
English
6
6
18
557
Chromedaffodils
Chromedaffodils@Chromedaffodils·
STOP HOLDING PAIN PATIENTS & DOCTORS HOSTAGE in your FAILED DRUG WAR The LIES you tell to get FUNDING for your addiction & recovery industry IS KILLING US & FORCING US into disability (burdening taxpayers) as we miss out on holidays, work, gardening & living our once normal life
Chromedaffodils tweet mediaChromedaffodils tweet mediaChromedaffodils tweet mediaChromedaffodils tweet media
Brandy Lee@Breelee420

I think about the pain this is causing and what will continue to cause. As I’ve been saying, U of Michigan been doing some insane stuff when it comes to HEALTHCARE. And these people won’t get their pain treated properly, they will load them up on Psych meds and Suboxone. America WHAT ARE WE DOING @SenAricNesbitt

English
2
28
64
1.8K
ilikeknitting
ilikeknitting@ilikelizards123·
I cannot stress this enough. Get a 2nd opinion at the best cancer facility you can afford to pay for a 2nd opinion consultation. No half assed facility. If you have to hop on a plane to Sloan-Kettering, then that is what you have to do. People are surviving now. The outcomes are only as good as how knowledgeable the physicians are Another woman I know was on death’s door stop. I gasped when I saw her. Her doc was smart enough to refer her to treatment in another country. She had some sort of throat cancer. She went over to Spain. The docs over there did the treatment. And no bs here, she is a new person. We’ll see if this is cured or in remission. But she has been good for close to three years now. I thought she was going to die. But not now.
English
1
0
1
76
Ames 🇺🇸❤️
Ames 🇺🇸❤️@Amyshartman·
I had a brutal double biopsy yesterday and found out this morning it’s malignant. 😢 Waited all day for my gyno to call with a surgeon and plan of action. No word yet. Freaking out.
English
388
52
930
17.2K