Jamie Allsopp

Have you watched The Manosphere with Louis Theroux on Netflix? As the Dad of a 17 year old son, I think @jimmycarr is spot on. What do you think?

Most Muslims consider drawing, dancing and music compatible with Islam. The Taliban and ISIS don’t. Britain seems poised to force the most restrictive and most puritanical form of Islam on all Brits, whether Muslim or not.

More than an embarrassment, a disgrace.

Are we allowed to do anything about this, or would that be against Labour party policy

📣🚨 The Free Speech Union is mounting a legal challenge against the Government over its official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as 'anti-Muslim hatred' — and its appointment of a new 'tsar' to punish people who fall foul of it. This amounts to a Muslim blasphemy law via the back door. The definition is vague and subjective, and will be weaponised to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam, Muslims, and Islamic practices and history. The FSU’s General Secretary, Lord Young of Acton, said: “This is the most serious threat to free speech the Government has come up with so far — the only area in which it’s achieving any success. “If we don’t win this fight, tens of thousands of people a year could lose their jobs at the say-so of a Labour-appointed ‘tsar’. It’s dystopian.” Public bodies will adopt this definition — despite it being non-statutory — with the same zeal the police have shown in investigating and recording non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs). It is predicted by one of the drafters of the definition that it could lead to around 20,000 reports of 'anti-Muslim hostility' a year. At present, the number of recorded anti-Muslim hate crimes is around 4,000. In a free society, no religion should be shielded from legitimate criticism. This proposal places one faith above the rest. The Free Speech Union is bringing a legal challenge on two grounds. First, the definition relies on nebulous, legally undefined terms such as “negative and prejudicial stereotyping of Muslims”, making it incoherent and irrational — and ripe for weaponisation. Second, adopting such a definition cuts across legislation already enacted by Parliament and therefore breaches the public law principle known as “occupying the field”. Under this established public law doctrine, new regulations, put in place by ministers, must not replace existing legislation. It is constitutionally unlawful. In this case, the body responsible for protecting Muslims from discrimination is the Equality and Human Rights Commission, not an anti-Muslim hostility 'tsar'. Parliament voted to abolish blasphemy laws 18 years ago. We can't let this Government resurrect them via the back door. This is one of the biggest battles the Free Speech Union has ever taken on in its six years — and we need your help. Judicial reviews are expensive, but this is a fight we felt we had to take on. Donate to our crowdfunder below👇

Let me get this straight: Hindus attacked by Islamists in Wembley Jews murdered by Islamists in Manchester And our government has spent the last two years drafting a definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” that limits our ability to confront it.

Watching the Labour front bench's attempt to restrict trial by jury makes me wonder whether Keir Starmer and David Lammy understand England at all. They are smashing up the fundamental freedoms of this country as if they were foreign invaders

Imagine Nigeria saying "black men will have less board seats in the future." It's not shocking that young whites are moving far-right. The UK was built by white men and they're being disenfranchised in their motherland in favor of newcomers. This would infuriate anyone.

Everybody was quick enough to take the knee so I find it sickening there hasn’t been a word from football’s good and the great ( you’re quiet Ian Wright) over the plight of Iran’s women’s football team who are being forced to take a flight home from Australia and face a perilous future for simply failing to sing their national anthem. Those poor women will be dealt with by a leadership that thinks nothing of killing between 6,000 and 30,000 young people in a matter of days. Where’s the public show of support from the Lionesses, or any of the MoTD gobshites, especially the women pundits or presenters. The silence is deafening. And shocking.

This MP said our work to expose West Midlands Police was “Islamophobic”. If he thinks he can silence me when I tell the truth, he will be in for a rude awakening. As for this definition, I will ignore it and advise the whole country to do the same.

Remember when we didn't need battlefield dressings on the bus? Then you're probably far-right.

I keep reading that it's "not all Muslims". Here are the Pew Trust figures. 1.4 BILLION Muslims, 86%, believe that the wife must ALWAYS obey her husband. So if he wants sex, he gets it, or he beats her with the approval of the Quran. 1.1 BILLION Muslims want Sharia law with all of its evils and its unending hatred of women. 3/4 BILLION Muslims want the death penalty for adultery (but a husband can have four wives). HALF A BILLION Muslims think that if someone leaves their violent terrorist cult, they should be killed. Well, actually, the Quran says they should either be killed, or crucified, or have a hand and a foot cut off on opposite sides of the body. Seriously. Half a billion Muslims think that's a righteous plan. They hate bacon, beer, women, music, dogs, chess, Jews, infidels, our ideas, our ideals, and our freedoms … and they whine about "Islamophobia". That's not a "phobia". That's a reasonable, sane, historically justified fear of violent, bloodthirsty 7th-Century barbarians. Wake up, folks. Islam is 100% incompatible with the West. It is not a religion. It is a terrorist cult. We likely can't get rid of the Muslims we have foolishly let in … but we damn sure shouldn't let in even one more. They want to establish a worldwide Caliphate, and far too many of them are more than happy to kill us to achieve that. Sadly, w.

Enough of all this.

His rage is 100% justifiable Thank you Trevor Phillips

@CromRedoubt The Duchess of Richmond's ball

Not to be melodramatic but this is quite Russian court speaking French in 1917

Christian preacher attacked in Whitechapel. Apparently he shouldn’t be there because it’s ‘a Muslim area’…but obviously it’s fine to build a £2m mega mosque in rural Cumbria.

I presume the Royal Mint is making an equivalent donation to the Anglican Alliance for all gold sales made during Lent?

Who is burning down the churches in UK!

@Rothmus Doable

They told you to be ashamed. 🇬🇧 They lied. Your ancestors ended slavery. Invented the modern world. Went to prison for walking on a hill. Ordinary people who changed the world. These stories were buried. We’re bringing them back - one video at a time. Help us reach millions more. Be proud of us. Be part of us. proudofus.co.uk 🇬🇧