quit-social-media

@ApexMetal I think you need to go for a walk

I'll never understand maga latinos. For example, if there was a presidential candidate who said "White men with Ukrainian and Italian heritage are POISONING our blood!" I probably wouldn't vote for that guy. Maybe there is something to trumps theory about their genetics being inferior, if nearly 40% support him, after the past year

@TenreiroDaniel Money Bank

Silicon Valley Bank is a terrible name for a bank.

@EconstratPB It's a good idea being executed by the worst White House imaginable.

Aside from the math not mathing (bodies and armament), we don’t have the political will. We can win if we engage in WWII style mobilization. But this is a war of choice. We don’t have a national purpose for a draft. My son is 11. This is not his purpose or his destiny.

@policytensor Right, Iran is already the model of the kind of country you don't want existing as a neighbor. god forbid they get a nuke and start acting with impunity.

Iran won’t end like North Korea. NK you can put in a box. Iran will control Hormuz and run the gulf. Get your heads out of your asses.

@JamesUrbaniak Maybe he's never seen Vicious 🤷‍♂️

I’m gonna start calling out fellow actors as well. Here goes: Vincent Gardenia was a flibbertigibbet!

@BillAckman @X youtube.com/shorts/eXDvsyp…

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

@Bonecondor Have you not looked at the passengers on the Staten Island ferry?

@stevehou Ah yes, just add sunlight! 😜

😍

@Rory_Johnston @conorsen It's ok to feel the way you did about the price at the pump. I don't know why you have to be working class to make a comment about a drastic price swing.

@conorsen Very blessed to be very fine 🙏🏻, was more a comment on how other motorists are going to be feeling

First time filling the family whip since the start of the Iran War that I made this face when I saw the price

@zerohedge Eye roll

Dems' Ballroom Hate Is the Saddest Proof Yet of Their State of TDS Mental Unwellness zerohedge.com/political/dems…

@TenreiroDaniel Light windbreaker to the rescue

is 65°F warm or is it lowkey chilly? 65°F doesn't seem to follow any discernible logic

@stevehou I eat peanuts with Coke, but never felt the need to pour them in. I've also not had boiled peanuts, even though they are sold in a lot of places where I'm from.

What's going on now?

@FreightAlley Any chance this is partially due to the changing supply chain landscape for most of the world lately?

Why isn’t anyone talking about this? The railroads, the backbone of American industrials, just reported that volume excluding coal, had the highest volume March since 2008! Chemicals +5.5% YoY - highest ever Grains - highest volume since 1993! There is so much noise in the economy, but the signal says that American industry is doing fantastic.

@Rory_Johnston We're gonna need more chart

Dated Brent (physical spot) price Truly insane chart, uncharted territory fr

@EconstratPB I understand your statement but I disagree with it. (ignoring Leber, I don't know anything about that account)

If you advocate for war, you should be willing to give up your kid or put a uniform over fat dad body. Otherwise, shut up.

@stevehou I'm fine going back to no tech. Maybe future generations will fight back by practicing penmanship.

I lowkey think that AI may be destroying society and humanity.

@MarioNawfal Are you investing with that thinking?

🚨🇺🇸 Trump celebrates 186,000 private sector jobs added in March, nearly triple the 65,000 expected. Trade deficit down 52% in a year. A war in Iran, oil above $100, and the economy still added nearly three times the expected jobs. Whatever you think of the foreign policy, the domestic economic engine is running hot. Factory construction and onshoring driven by tariffs are doing exactly what the administration said they would. Happy Good Friday.

@Gothamist Because no one cares.

New Yorkers set out triple the amount of compost last April compared to the month before: gothamist.visitlink.me/Hm8IVb

@DariusDale42 We are all Hormuz right now

My wife just shook her head at me for continuing to give our toddler Thin Mints™️ before dinner every time I go get them from the kitchen (to get one for myself). My immediate reply, while shrugging: “Strait of Hormuz.” 🤷🏾‍♂️ 😂😂😭

@dieworkwear I don't mind button fly. The only downside I have is it's harder to use once handed.

Although zippers were invented before the dawn of the 20th century, they didn't appear on men's clothing until the interwar period. Early versions were expensive, clunky, and often not well-marketed. People were also reluctant to put this newfangled technology on their bodies because clothes are tied to personal identity. Thus, they first appeared on tobacco pouches, rain boots, and children's clothing before making it onto menswear. Since jeans were invented in the early 1870s, they were made with buttons for about 50 years before Lee introduced a zippered version in the 1920s (the Lee 101Z). Still, even that model was not terribly popular. It was not until the 1950s that zippers started appearing on jeans en masse, meaning people had been primarily using buttons on their jeans for about 80 years before zippered denim flies were really a "thing." If you close your eyes and imagine iconic mid-century jeans — such as Marlon Brando in the 1953 film The Wild One — there's a strong chance they're button-fly jeans. That's why guys who are into vintage-styled jeans prefer a button closure. It's the same reason why $500 Japanese repro-style jeans will still feature a serged inseam: that's how jeans were made back in the day, even if it's considered a "cheaper" method than something like a French seam. Whether on jeans or tailored trousers, there are many reasons to prefer a button fly. First, there's less chance of mechanical failure. Second, since buttons are spaced apart and a zipper is a continuous metal object, a button fly will sit a bit flatter than its zippered counterpart. This fact was referenced in the debut episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm ("This is like a five-inch bunch-up I have here"). The downside is that they take a bit more time to fasten (I find unfastening is the same once you get the hang of it). A friend of mine once joked that button flies make you unnecessarily fiddle with yourself down there at a urinal, which could attract unwanted suspicion. I much prefer a button-fly, partly because I like vintage details and prefer the fly to lay flatter when I sit down. In fact, Italian tailors like the design so much that they commonly use a seven-button fly! About four up the fly, then a fiddly three-button closure to keep the fly and waistband stable. Think of it as a chastity belt. If you want to learn more about zippers, Google "Articles of Interest zippers." Avery Trufelman did a deep dive into the zipper's history in a 45-minute podcast episode. It's genuinely a fascinating listen.