Othmane

@Radio1Rai These videos are not from the Maldives caves

🔵 #Maldive Completate le operazioni dei sommozzatori esperti finlandesi. Nuova ipotesi: le vittime, ingannate dalla sabbia, sarebbero finite in un cunicolo senza uscita. Lunedì l’autopsia sul corpo di Gianluca Benedetti, domani il rientro in Italia delle altre 4 salme

@Jenhollidayx @mamboitaliano__ the cavern diver course is not a cave diving certification.

@othm_g @mamboitaliano__ PADI offers that certification - that’s my only point. I believe we agree that under no circumstances should anyone be diving caves without proper training and equipment.

“Cave diving” Stay calm here 🌊 I’m already out of breath just watching the video How could this even be possible?

@Jenhollidayx @mamboitaliano__ from your link "allowing you to enter far enough for adventure, but staying within the light zone for an easy exit to open water." this is not cave diving. in your link you need to be able to see the exit at anytime + likely around 30-40m distance from the surface at all times.

@othm_g @mamboitaliano__ store.padi.com/en-us/ns/cours…

@therealbmw85 @Jenhollidayx @mamboitaliano__ yes GUE has good programs as well, but less known

@othm_g @Jenhollidayx @mamboitaliano__ Exactly this. You go the tech route you go SDI-TDI.

@Jenhollidayx @mamboitaliano__ none of the padi certification would let you go in a cave

@mamboitaliano__ I have multiple PADI certifications, and it’s still a giant “nope.”

@thudapatro image clearly generated by AI, makes no sense from a diving perspective

Specialized team of expert deep-sea and cave divers from Finland (including Sami Paakkarinen and Patrik Grönqvist) mobilized by DAN Europe. They were brought in to successfully map recovery strategies and locate missing Italian divers in a deadly Vaavu Atoll cave tragedy.

@amanhaleemmv @MNDF_Official plenty of people dive to 60m on air, it's not advisable but from a human anatomy it works (po2 would be 1.4).

This scientifically illiterate, lethal, and indefensible command decision by @MNDF_Official needs to be investigated. You can’t rewrite human physiology regardless of your training or the uniform you wear.

@Thewarjurnal_ None of the équipement in this photo is fit for a cave or deep dive, hopefully that’s not the actual image

BREAKING: 🇲🇻 Maldives authorities say the bodies of four missing Italian scuba divers who died last week have been located. Source: Reuters / Al Jazeera #Maldives #Italy #BreakingNews #ScubaDiving #WorldNews

@JackLinFLL They likely thought it was the exit, disoriented from the silt

The bodies of the other four divers have been located in the 3rd chamber in the Maldives cave apparently at nearly 200'. This is a full on technical cave dive these people never belonged on. Never let your bravado overrule your common sense. RIP

@GadzhiIman rather get the cheaper room in the most expensive hotel than the most expensive room in the cheaper hotel

I stayed at a €6,000 a night penthouse in the Dolomites and it was a good reminder that just because you can afford the nicest thing, doesn't mean it's worth it. The €1,500 suite gives you the same view, the same spa, the same ski-in/ski-out, & you barely spend time in the room anyway. Never lose your ability to tell which luxuries are worth it, that’s how you end up going broke.

@Lungtermplan @PKPatchworks nitrox doesn't help for depth, quite the opposite it can lead to oxygen toxicity.

@PKPatchworks You don't go past 40feet without Nitrox? Are you getting metric and imperial mixed up?

Christ. 160 is way past past narc depth and into CNS oxygen toxicity range. Been diving for most of my life and the deepest I've ever been was 210 on trimix and that was incredibly intimidating. I don't even go past 40 without nitrox. Can't imagine 160 on air. Those poor people.

@PKPatchworks - "I don't even go past 40 without nitrox" this means nothing - oxygen toxicity can happen at 10meters, depends on your mix. - 160 on air is p02 of 1.2 is completely safe from an oxygen toxicity point, it's dangerous for narcosis though

@zeroxjackson We’ll soon slap AI on top of it and it’s gonna be all fine

There is no technical reason for infrastructure to be more complicated than the Supabase dashboard.

@danywander @bchesky How is what you said not applicable when a human uses Airbnb ?

if you've ever questioned your presence on x, i'd send you this screenshot. but i agree with @bchesky it sounds easy to say "need a nice cabin within 2h drive" but that's super naive. in marketplaces data mismatch have a price. let me elaborate. a user says: "i need a nice cabin within 2h drive" okay. - 2 hours from where? current location? home? by car or train? - what does "nice" mean? luxury? cozy? cheap but charming? - does cabin mean an actual wooden cabin in the woods or just a house in the countryside? - when? this weekend? flexible dates? 2 adults? family? dog? budget? wifi? instant booking only? as a human we compress intent. but it doesn't work for booking systems. it needs exact constraints. chat makes the problem feel solved because the conversation feels natural. but finding a place to book is not JUST a conversation. the listings themselves are messy. - one host says "cozy" and means small. another says "cozy" and means dark basement. - photos make places look bigger. - listings are incomplete. - locations are hidden before you book. - descriptions are written like marketing copy. in natural way you could say "find me a quiet cabin with sunset views". then the question is - where is "quiet" and "sunset view" stored in database? so the ai guesses from whatever metadata it can find. sometimes it works. often it doesn't. and when wrong answer in chatgpt costs you nothing, on marketplaces mistakes cost money. - wrong cancellation rules. - pets actually not allowed. - listing unavailable. - distance wrong. - hidden fees. - bad check-in assumptions. travel is a transaction and accuracy matters way more than just add an entry on my calendar. travel is visual. people scan photos, prices, maps, ratings, amenities all at once. even if its look complex ui etc. but in chat ui it becomes just a queue: "here's option one." "here's option two." slower than a grid. way slower. and ranking gets weird. if the ai picks 5 listings why those 5? best match? paid placement? hidden bias? safety call? people still not ready to give up on personal control of the outcome. they want to be sure that they've done everything to find that exact place to stay. speed matters too. a good conversational booking needs intent parsing, availability checks, price lookup, policy fetch, ranking, maps, personalization. and many more. nobody likes waiting 10 seconds, over and over, for "thinking…" and this is just an exploration phase. then we have "book it" part. - which one? - what dates? - which card? - who's traveling? - did you accept house rules? chat feels nice until you have to sign or pay. so chat probably doesn't replace forms. it just makes discovery better. i'd bet on chat for intent to start with → filters for custom work and filtering → cards and maps for comparison → normal boring checkout. you can just make a chat as ui when the moat is still the boring stuff - trust, clean inventory and control.

@dharmesh @bchesky Why do wealthy have staff handling and booking travel for them ? It's the same way people would interact with a chat agent. doesn't mean there are no images.

I'm with @bchesky on this one. I think the future is not about apps, but about agents. But the shift to agents doesn't necessarily mean text-forward, chat-based UIs. That makes sense for some use cases -- but not all. The future is about agents that work on your behalf, often in the background, and let you interact in ways that make sense. Sometimes, that means typing text, but others it might be a personalized UI element. UI affordances are underrated. Sometimes humans need some guidance and nudges instead of an empty prompt box. I think hybrid agentic interfaces will be the future. And it's not just about B2C. Turns out, B2B users are people too. :)

@davidpattersonx Taxes are not only about gov services, also about wealth sharing

If taxes were fair: You earn $100,000 per year and pay $30,000 in tax. Your neighbor earns $1,000,000 and pays $300,000 in tax. Your neighbor is paying 10X more than you. If taxes were fair, you should both pay $30,000, since you both receive the same government services.

@PalmerLuckey @garrytan @AOC It’s always the same old age issue, does the product of work goes to the provider of capital or the workforce. This depends on the negotiation power of each.

@AOC The idea that all billionaires got their money by exploiting peopl doesn't hold up to any scrutiny. JK Rowling wrote books about cheeky wizards. I invented a better way to make virtual reality headsets and games to play on them. We just made things people wanted.

The single largest form of theft in America is wage theft. $50 billion a year are stolen from American workers. If a billionaire amasses their wealth by underpaying their full-time workers so severely that they must rely on food assistance and government programs to survive, then no, that wealth was not earned by one individual - it was a wealth transfer subsidized by underpaid American workers and the public who get stuck with the bill for large corporations free-riding off our systems. The point is less about individual morality. It’s more about how our current economic reality of shattering inequality rewards screwing over workers and exploiting essential systems at scale. We’re talking monopoly power. Rent-seeking. Wage theft. Profiteering. Stock buybacks. Destabilizing housing markets. Companies using SNAP/EBT to underwrite their wages. Massive government subsidies or contracts to corporations following lobbying and dark money in politics with little to no oversight or accountability. Some people get enraged that I draw attention to this. That’s on them. Let them call me shrill, dumb, inexperienced, girly, uneducated - these folks will say anything to distract from or undercut the truth that working people are getting screwed, and giving people a fair shake means we must have a grown conversation about reigning in abuse of power.

@POTFES if a doctor can spot them with the naked eye (or a magnifying glass) then AI should be able to do the same (with appropriate training).

Wouldn't it be faster if it was a stationary chamber with multiple cameras instead of this sci-slop?

@okkzion he seems to be talking respectfully, he has high demand but it's professional

This is why the Atlanta hospitality industry for black spaces is so toxic and trash now he talking to them girls like they combat medics…

@AIandDesign could it depend on when during the day you use it ? I'm based in Europe and almost never reach the limit

People who constantly run out of Claude tokens: WTF are you doing? I have a whole portfolio full of work made with it and I never run out of tokens.