Quinn Batten

862 posts

Quinn Batten banner
Quinn Batten

Quinn Batten

@quinnbatten

https://t.co/R3F9KJz0Of Mostly here to repost tweets about urbanism, bikes, and city govt in Philly/NYC

Katılım Ekim 2014
3.7K Takip Edilen168 Takipçiler
ivan
ivan@IvanVendrov·
researching air purifiers and just learned about the Corsi-Rosenthal Box. beautiful piece of diy hardware - just need a box fan, filters and duct tape
ivan tweet media
English
23
134
1.8K
65.1K
Quinn Batten retweetledi
“paula”
“paula”@paularambles·
You see, what fascinates me about “remember to not smile” is that he needs his pain to be witnessed. He suffers at 4am, okay, fine, many people suffer. But then, immediately, he makes a slide! He gathers the entire company! He writes an article! Is it not clear what is happening here? Suffering without an audience simply does not count. This is ideology at its purest. We see here the old Protestant trick in its Silicon Valley form: success alone is vulgar, almost pornographic. My god, you cannot simply succeed. It must first be purified through unnecessary suffering. So you get this obscene reversal where pain stops being a cost of the product, and instead becomes the product itself. The developer documentation is, how do you say, merely the byproduct, the excrement of the true production, which is the suffering. As Hegel already knew, and here I think even Lacan would agree, although perhaps not, the true obsession is always with deserving success. Here I must tell you this old joke from Soviet Union. A worker says: "we pretend to work, they pretend to pay us.” Now here it is inverted, which I claim is much worse. They are paid perfectly well, wonderfully well, and so they must pretend to suffer. Do you see the perfect madness of this? And now, the ultimate obscenity. Imagine the company succeeds while everyone leaves at 5pm. Catastrophe! Total ontological catastrophe! In this worldview, I am tempted to say, failure would almost come as a relief. Failure means you simply did not suffer enough, go back, suffer more. But success at 5pm? This cannot be explained. So when he says "remember to not smile," this is a desperate command of the superego. If you smile, we will all discover the pain was never necessary.
“paula” tweet media
Han Wang@handotdev

x.com/i/article/2076…

English
180
298
2.9K
192.6K
Quinn Batten retweetledi
hyper(bolic) disco(unting) girl
bruh i just realized people are using the 👀 emoji react on slack to mean "I am looking into this matter" I've been using it for over a year at my job just to mean like whoa
English
189
465
27.4K
588.6K
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
@teej_m weird and disconcerting artisan still topping the charts of "creepy personifications of an AI product" though
Quinn Batten tweet media
English
0
0
2
25
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
It's also critical to publicize these decisions early on. There's a 90% chance someone will come out of the woodwork and tell you about an upcoming project you've never heard of that has super-specific requirements around freshness. Gotta get that out in the open ASAP! 3/3
English
0
0
0
5
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
Usually the answer is "ummm" and "Joe said" That's your opportunity to really get in the weeds on this. If you get it right, you can save a lot of money and grief by not over-building OR by not building something that doesn't actually meet the needs of someone downstream. 2/
English
1
0
0
6
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
Slight tangent but she gets this exactly right ... when someone tells you the data needs to be "real-time," you GOTTA ask them what they actually mean and how they got to that number. 1/
Jacqueline Cheong@JacquelineSYC19

I asked three different data leaders the same question over the past week: how fresh does your data actually need to be? I got three completely different answers. The first, at a healthtech company, needs sub-minute. Their operational database and their analytics layer feed the same workflows, and any gap between the two shows up as an inconsistency a clinician might see. The second runs monitoring on physical equipment. 5 minutes is the absolute ceiling, and ideally it is under one. The third runs internal analytics for a lean team. He told me 15 to 20 minutes is perfectly fine, and that probably would work for some of their agentic use cases. Most latency requirements are never traced. Someone writes "real-time" into an evaluation doc because it sounds rigorous, the vendor prices against it, and nobody asks what breaks at minute 6. The honest question sits downstream: what does the data feed, and what does it cost when it goes stale. For years, "real-time" could mean fifteen minutes and nobody got hurt. The slack was big enough that the imprecision never cost you - one dashboard, one report, one batch job, fifteen minutes covered all of it. You could write "real-time", mean almost anything, and be right. Agents close that gap. When an agent is acting on your data instead of a human, 70 seconds and 6 minutes are two different products. One catches the stale record before it acts. The other acts on it, and now you're cleaning up a decision instead of refreshing a chart. That's the shift we're seeing across the board So the rigor that never mattered suddenly does. Not "is it real-time" but what specifically breaks at 70 seconds, and what breaks at minute 6. That answer is a spec. "Real-time" is just a feeling that sounded rigorous in a doc. If you own a data platform: has anyone actually traced your strictest latency requirement lately - or is it still a word someone wrote a long time ago?

English
1
0
1
84
Thomas Mack
Thomas Mack@Thomas_F_Mack·
@OpenAI All of my projects from the old chatgpt app are gone in the new chatgpt/codex app.
English
1
0
2
78
OpenAI
OpenAI@OpenAI·
Introducing ChatGPT Work, a new agent in ChatGPT powered by Codex and GPT-5.6. It can take action across your apps and files, stay with a project for hours if needed, and turn a goal into finished work. It’s a whole new way to get work done.
English
1.2K
2.2K
21.8K
10.8M
Victor
Victor@victor_zhng·
OpenAI killed ChatGPT. The updated Mac app is Codex and the old app is becoming ChatGPT classic. Where is the chat in the new superApp? @sama Dude, you got 1Bn users. Not 1Bn Users use the app for work. There is no coherence in the strategy. It's a mess.
Victor tweet media
English
1
1
3
173
Kevin Moran
Kevin Moran@KevinTechTalk·
@thsottiaux @steipete How about fixing regular ChatGPT where I can no longer get to any of my projects or previous conversations without going to web?
English
2
0
3
1.3K
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
Morning. The last 48 hours of Codex and ChatGPT Work have been intense! Three important updates: - Temporarily removing the 5 hour usage limit restriction for all Plus, Business and Pro plans - Rolling out changes that will make GPT 5.6 Sol more efficient across the board and that will be reflected in less usage being used so that it can take you further. Exact impact to be quantified and shared - We hit 6M active users, and are landing a usage reset in the next hour Go do things
English
2.8K
2K
25.6K
4.6M
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
This transition is pretty messy, not a fan of the new chat UI at all.
English
0
0
1
31
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
"ChatGPT is now Codex" ok sure I guess. But where did all the chats go that I started on my phone? And from my old ChatGPT app? Answer: Go to the left sidebar in the new desktop app and click "Chat." That brings up a little popup. Click "See all" on the bottom of that.
English
2
0
1
221
Quinn Batten retweetledi
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
2. Capture mind-share via influencers. The people who write & post about tools/models the most are NOT middle-mgrs or CTOs, they're mostly full-time content makers (see: pro-sumer!) The more impressive your $20-200 sub is, the more free air-time you get from influencers.
English
0
0
0
11
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
... and subscription plans serve other purposes too! 1. Build hype about harnesses & new models. Pro-sumer demand drives enterprise demand. Devs learn about new tools from side-project work they do, then they come and demand those tools at work.
English
1
0
0
15
Quinn Batten
Quinn Batten@quinnbatten·
A lot of people think that the frontier labs lose money on subscription plans... I reallyy don't think they do! This idea stems from ppl looking at (API prices * tokens)... but remember they make a CRAZY margin on API usage (90%)! The subs are probably still quite profitable.
Martin Alderson@martinald

As someone that has got so much flak off people for estimating frontier AI labs gross margin inference % at ~90% for the past ~year it is good to see @SemiAnalysis_ agreeing

English
1
0
1
36
Quinn Batten retweetledi
Martin Alderson
Martin Alderson@martinald·
As someone that has got so much flak off people for estimating frontier AI labs gross margin inference % at ~90% for the past ~year it is good to see @SemiAnalysis_ agreeing
Martin Alderson tweet media
English
2
1
3
139
Quinn Batten retweetledi
Dan Katz
Dan Katz@DanKatzIMF·
None of this implies that the adjustment will be smooth or costless. Even when technological change ultimately supports net job creation, the transition can be disruptive.
English
1
1
15
2.3K
Quinn Batten retweetledi
Dan Katz
Dan Katz@DanKatzIMF·
This time could always be different. But the overwhelming weight of historical evidence supports the claim that innovative technologies do not cause mass unemployment.
English
8
11
109
41.3K