Yort

@cmacloves @Pady_oFurniture @reignitedem @TRobinsonNewEra Yes, we are laughing at you and how gullible you are. Please don’t breed

@Pady_oFurniture @reignitedem Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra · 3h "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Unite The Kingdom 🇬🇧

Millions of patriots flock to London to send a clear message...NO MORE MASS IMMIGRATION! It's not too late for Australia...we can minimise immigration and save our country!!!

@LizaDolittle1 @RonWhit74170753 @mattjcan @ShackelWill @Peter_Fitz You can’t for a second believe a reactor will cost $120 billion to build. You wouldn’t be stupid enough the believe that would you?

@RonWhit74170753 @mattjcan @ShackelWill @Peter_Fitz Did you believe the lie that it would cost $600 billion - you wouldnt be stupid enough to believe Labor again would you Ron?

Not true @Peter_Fitz, in his budget reply Taylor emphasised that the Coalition want Australia’s bans to be lifted. They costed their nuclear power plants at about 120bn in line with CSIRO estimates, not 600bn which is a false figure from the ‘Smart’ Energy Council.

@ShackelWill @Peter_Fitz $120. Billion 😂😂😂😂😂 you are dreaming if you believe this number for more than 1 second, fucking laughable

Not true @Peter_Fitz, in his budget reply Taylor emphasised that the Coalition want Australia’s bans to be lifted. They costed their nuclear power plants at about 120bn in line with CSIRO estimates, not 600bn which is a false figure from the Smart Energy Council. x.com/nuclearforaus/…

The Libs appear to have abandoned you @ShackelWill ? What now? Three years ago, they were happy to commit $600 billion or so of taxpayer money to nuclear. Now, they acknowledge that was the wrong call?

We must all stand up and fight back against the Government’s vicious tax grab and their string of broken promises. All Australian starting their own businesses and all investors deserve better than this economic sabotage. We must call it out. Join the army of millions against this insanity.

@EnergyWrapAU @lvan61 If they got their money throughout their life via these trusts, then no they haven’t paid tax all their lives. They’ve lived tax free while enjoying everything that taxpayers have paid for

@lvan61 You forgot the decades of tax and private health they paid already.

I fail to see the problem for one's income to be redistributed among your own family so the family keeps more of their own income. The actual problem here is this should be allowed without a trust. It should be the default setting.

@paulkniest @PaulineHansonOz You’re confused? Imagine being in her head.

@PaulineHansonOz Sorry Pauline but just the other day you were railing against Labor’s changes to negative gearing and CGT because they were a communist wealth distribution plot. Now you’re calling for wealth distribution to young Australians? Are you a commie now? I’m confused. Please explain.

I feel for the young people of today looking at buying a house. In my day, it was about 3x the average wage to purchase a home. In some places now, its 15x wages. Add to that, the government is leaving the future generations with a $1 trillion dollar debt that they'll have to pay off. It's time to wake up to ourselves as a country and get it back on track.

@GeoffWilsonWAM Fuck me. You really scraping the bottom of the barrel now champ. Hoe fucking pathetic are you.

Very sad but true Alister. We need to fight until this insanity is stopped

@Gary15721689441 @tompanos @BibasKfir

@tompanos @BibasKfir Your correct Tom, I was intending to sale one of mine next financial year but after reviewing the budget we are now keeping it for retirement income. Last month in anticipation of this budget I increased rent 19%

The budget may have triggered the opposite effect the government wanted. Investors are holding properties tighter to protect grandfathered benefits, while many landlords are increasing rents to protect cash flow. #propertymarket #australianproperty

@alisterberkeley @GeoffWilsonWAM @cjoye Who gives a fuck what your ex wife that lives in a shithole country thinks. It means fuck all.

This message exchange is with my ex-wife who is a Partner at a New York law firm working in international financial markets @GeoffWilsonWAM @cjoye 🤯

@SenatorCash It’s all you have

Biological women and girls deserve single sex spaces. That is just common sense.

@GeoffWilsonWAM @AlboMP Why aren’t you mentioning this? Doesn’t fit your narrative?

Australian Monopoly - you start a business in Australia and it succeeds then the @AlboMP Government takes 47% in tax when it’s sold. The highest tax in the developed world.

@TraderCobb Like this stuff?

@TraderCobb So your company would not take advantage of instant tax write offs, depreciation, write downs etc? Who’s underwriting your risk now? The taxpayer ? And when you succeed you don’t feel that needs some form of repayment? The taxpayer is there in case you fail with social security

Let me get this straight..... If I invest 500k into a startup, take all the risk, put in years of work and become one of the very small % that succeed in a meaningful way — when I sell, under the new budget the government takes 47%. They funded nothing and took zero risk. On a 500k capital gain that's $235,000 gone. And here's the kicker: because a founder builds from nothing, there's almost no cost base to index. The new "inflation discount" shelters almost nothing for the people who actually build companies. It was designed to hit you hardest. If I take that same 500k to the casino and put it all on black and win, I make $500k and they tax nothing. The time to either win or lose is in seconds, and the outcome if I win is better. The probability of winning is 50% — far better odds than the startup, and a lot faster. So this government will back the gambling companies — they refuse to budge on their own findings and recommendations despite being in complete power — and they'll prop up gambling, but they'll shoot innovation in the head. Founders, leave now is the message. Fair? #auspol

@mattjcan Taxes will be lower under a Liberal and Nationals Government * (* taxes for rich people)

We will oppose and repeal all of Labor's bad taxes. Labor's tax on property - by closing negative gearing - will go Labor's tax on investment - by increasing capital gains taxes - will go. Labor's tax on small business - by taxing trusts - will go. Labor's tax on non electric cars will go. Labor's tax on industry - through carbon taxes - will go. Labor's silent inflation tax - through bracket creep - will go. Taxes will be lower under a Liberal and Nationals Government.

@TimWilsonMP True to your word. Fucking liar

The Albanese Government is sneaking in a death tax. No Australian voted for this. Share your story at notthetax.com.au

@TimWilsonMP Fucking liar

@PaulineHansonOz x.com/tracywesterman…

Backward step for women’s rights in Australia   15 May 2026   One Nation will again attempt to protect women-only spaces from transgender ideology by moving amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act to reflect biological definitions of men and women following the Federal Court’s decision against Sall Grover in the Giggle v Tickle appeal.   Party leader Senator Pauline Hanson said the decision had stripped hard-fought women’s rights in Australia.   “I’m disgusted with this outcome,” Senator Hanson said. “It flies in the face of biological reality and strips rights from women.   “Women-only spaces are no longer protected and are no longer safe from transgender extremism. Where are the feminists who are happy to invoke women’s rights when it’s convenient but are conspicuously silent when transgender extremism stomps all over them with man-sized boots?   “Where are we going as a society when our courts won’t protect Australian women and can’t recognise there are only two genders: male and female?   “I condemn this appalling decision and I commend Sall Grover for refusing to give up the fight on behalf of Australian women everywhere. I hope she takes this to the High Court and I wish her every success in doing so.”   Senator Hanson said One Nation was the only party that had tried to amend the SDA and reverse changes made under the Gillard Labor Government that inserted identity politics and removed biological definitions of men and women.   One Nation attempted to move an amendment in September 2024, but in a rare case the Senate denied its introduction and denied Senator Hanson’s right to speak in the chamber.   “I will not stop fighting to change the law and support the rights of women to have safe spaces and sports that exclude biological men,” she said.

@lotusblossom59 @jeff_kennett So none of this makes any sense. Why would you buy health insurance for an issue you can’t claim on for 12 months, pay $9k x 2 years plus monthly premiums for a service you can’t use? Quite simply, I don’t believe you and you’ve been caught out making up crap for some reason

@troymondo @jeff_kennett Have to wait 12 months

The removal of the rebate for private health insurance for people over 65, is grossly unfair. The rebate should have been means tested. Many seniors are low income or on pensions. Their health insurance is often their biggest expense which they struggle to keep. Unfair.

@PaulineHansonOz x.com/tracywesterman…

In One Nation's Budget Reply, I outlined our vision of hope for the future. I have so much to say about saving this country that I ran out of time to say all of it. Watch my full budget reply and read a copy of what I wasn't able to fit in below: "We are covering our land with windmills and solar panels and in turn delivering the dearest and most precarious electricity grid our nation has ever had, when we had the cheapest coal fired power and sitting on one of the greatest coal resources in the globe. One Nation does not care about major party sneers. We care about handing our children a better opportunity than was handed to us by our parents, currently it is the other way around. One Nation will reallocate the resources from the fool's errand of Australia changing the weather to invest in coal fired power, nuclear, irrigation, freight, rail, ports and roads. We will work with businesses as partners in these projects. One Nation will listen to civil engineers, nuclear physicists, and research scientists in medicine instead of climate change bureaucrats. These assets on our nations balance sheet allows us to pay for expenses on the Profit and Loss. These assets build a nation that can repay its debts. One Nation is offering a fundamentally different direction -one rooted in proven, common sense economic principles. We'll lower taxes on working families, slash regulation that strangles enterprise, deliver abundant and affordable energy, and back the industries that actually create real wealth and opportunity. We will never pretend we know better than you how to run your own lives. That is why we are determined to hand power back to the Australian people where it belongs. We will reward hard work and aspiration, restore fiscal discipline, and put Australian families and businesses first once again. One Nation's word is our bond - and we have three decades of unwavering policy consistency to prove it. We hope to earn your trust to implement the bold change Australia desperately needs. Thank you."

@BenNiall1 @paxtherock @NoelWhittaker it’s clear you don’t understand it then. It’s partially grandfathered - anything after 2027 is when all gains are taxed under the new rules. And to be fair they do employ estate agents, trades etc. not that I’m sticking up for them but youve made very general generalisations

@troymondo @paxtherock @NoelWhittaker With this tax regime , I would not do it ,that is the point - this budget has grandfathered boomers with property portfolios who employ no one , left gas comp to rip off the country for 17-34b a year , gone after real employers who are the engine of growth, the future tax base

I'm running numbers on family trusts. If the trust owned by mum, dad, and 19-year-old daughter earns $180,000 a year and they distribute $60,000 to each the tax will be three times $9,000 = $27000. At 30% flat, it's $54,000. That's double - The only way out is to change distributions to wages, but they must be able to justify the wage. It's a shameful attack on business