ItsJustMe

40.9K posts

ItsJustMe

ItsJustMe

@ItsJustMe44

Beigetreten Mayıs 2009
217 Folgt459 Follower
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@susancrabtree @SecretService At this point, who amongst us would be shocked to discover this? Truly a disgrace that the Service has been essentially MIA for more than a decade, and the incompetence repeated all too frequently.
English
0
0
0
10
Susan Crabtree
Susan Crabtree@susancrabtree·
❓❓❓Was the Secret Service Uniformed Division officer shot last night in a case of friendly fire? I just asked the @SecretService about the possibility that the UD officer was hit by another Secret Service officer or agent based on the analysis of the video below. I'm told there's a gag order on the entire Secret Service over what exactly occurred last night in terms of who shot whom. Sources in the Secret Service community are raising friendly fire questions based on a joint analysis of the below video, which they shared with me: Analysis: Video shows officer in suit (upper right) looking in opposite direction (allegedly distracted by a female walking by).  There are 2 UD officers in uniform deeply engrossed in conversation (lower left). All three USSS are totally oblivious to gunman running towards them at the checkpoint with weapon in hand. A UD officer in uniform (lower left) pivots while stepping back with handgun drawn and fires at the gunman running through the checkpoint (in direct line of fire of the male UD in suit). UD in suit gets hit by shot fired at gunman by UD in uniform, and he hunches over but still remains standing while stepping back and pulling his handgun to also fire at perp running through the checkpoint. Then u see 3-4 USSS firing at the gunman from behind as gunman is running away. Yet no one shot hits the gunman."
SETH WEATHERS@sethweathers

I enhanced the security footage from last nights assassination attempt using AI. The footage was extremely low quality and it seems AI made up some things to fill in the gaps, but gives a better view of what took place.

English
63
87
249
33.4K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@JonathanTurley I hate to say it Professor, but a DC jury does not have my vote of confidence dispense here. He’ll be home before the weekend I suspect
English
0
0
0
21
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
...Allen will be arraigned today. His manifesto and his statements undermine any defense. This was clearly an attempted political assassination. His writings and planning will make any incapacity defense unlikely. While the defense would love a jury with with the lingering doubts of President Obama, the videotape is likely to leave much room for the defense to work with a jury.
English
78
268
1.9K
33.2K
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
President Obama cautioned that we really do not know the motives of Cole Allen. foxnews.com/politics/obama… Sure, he called Trump the "anti-Christ" and said he wanted to attack the Administration. However, he might have been a disgruntled hotel guest or someone vehemently against dinner parties.
English
677
1.6K
6.2K
68.4K
ItsJustMe retweetet
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
As a tease for what is coming later -- but also because I get tired of Weissmann being rolled out as a legal authority on anything -- my article will begin thusly: "Andrew Weissmann “left” DOJ in the weeks following the Supreme Court’s 9-0 decision reversing his crowning achievement as head of the Enron Task Force, the conviction of Big Five accounting firm Arthur Anderson. Here are the facts surrounding his departure: Weissmann was part of the Enron Task Force when it was created in 2002, and became Director in 2004. But the Enron investigation began prior to the Task Force being formed, and was handled by Weissmann in the Fraud Section of DOJ’s Criminal Division. It was then moved to the Enron Task Force when Weissmann moved. The indictment was handed down in March 2002, and the trial was in May-June 2002 — the facts were largely undisputed and the issues at trial mostly involved “intent” and a legal interpretation of the “obstruction” statute Weissmann relied upon. The conviction led to Arthur Anderson’s collapse as a company, with 85,000 jobs lost world-wide, and 30,000 jobs lost in the U.S. The Supreme Court reversed the conviction of Arthur Anderson on May 31, 2005. The vote was 9-0 that the theory used by Weismann was constitutionally unsound — with Antonin Scalia agreeing with Ruth Bader Ginsburge that Weissmann didn’t know what he was doing. DOJ announced Weissmann’s departure from the Enron Task Force on July 18, 2005 — 6 weeks after the verdict. When Weissmann joined the New York law firm of Jenner & Block in January 2006, the firm’s announcement said he was “Special Counsel” to FBI Director Mueller from July to December 2005 — strongly suggesting Mueller saved him from being politely "asked" to leave DOJ in the aftermath of the Arthur Anderson FIASCO. From the Supreme Court’s opinion in Arthur Anderson, commenting on the legal theory pressed by Weissmann in the trial through the jury instructions he urged the trial judge to use: "The instructions also were infirm for another reason. They led the jury to believe that it did not have to find any nexus between the “persua[sion]” to destroy documents and any particular proceeding…. [T]he Government relies heavily on §1512(e)(1), which states that an official proceeding “need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense.” It is, however, one thing to say that a proceeding “need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense,” and quite another to say a proceeding need not even be foreseen. A “knowingly … corrup[t] persaude[r]” cannot be someone who persuades others to shred documents under a document retention policy when he does not have in contemplation any particular official proceeding in which those documents might be material." Basically, Weissmann pressed the theory that a criminal conviction for document destruction could stand even when the entity engaging in the destruction had no reason to believe the documents would ever be used in a criminal investigation. He was wrong — 9-0 — but 85,000 people still lost their jobs and a Big Five accounting firm ceased to exist because of his incompetence. Did Weissmann have to go? Well, he went. His LEGAL CAREER should have ended after that — not just his DOJ career. But, as I noted, Mueller saved him. Don’t ask me why.
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew

What an absolute GIFT. I get to spend all day on Sunday explaining why Andrew Weissman is a duplicitous moron, why he was reversed 9-0 by the Supreme Court, and why his criticisms of the SPLC indictment make my case for me. The more people rely on him for ANYTHING the more disconnected from reality they appear.

English
65
716
1.9K
64K
Elizabeth
Elizabeth@ViewFrom72·
@ChidiNwatu @BarackObama Oh yes, the 2011 correspondents dinner really showed him taking the high road, didn’t it? The Obama I voted for in 2008 is not the same Obama today. Compare his speeches from 08 to last year‘s DNC speech, and that will tell you everything you need to know. It’s very sad.
English
2
0
5
596
Barack Obama
Barack Obama@BarackObama·
Although we don’t yet have the details about the motives behind last night's shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner, it’s incumbent upon all us to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy. It’s also a sobering reminder of the courage and sacrifice that U.S. Secret Service Agents show every day. I’m grateful to them – and thankful that the agent who was shot is going to be okay.
English
35.9K
17.1K
223K
60.7M
ItsJustMe retweetet
Matt Taibbi
Matt Taibbi@mtaibbi·
Every reporter who’s sold the phony “pedophilia” story should think about where these manias lead:
Matt Taibbi tweet mediaMatt Taibbi tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸 The full manifesto of WHCD gunman Cole Allen has been obtained by the New York Post. Key takeaways: - A 31-year-old California teacher who described himself as "half-black, half-white" - Sent the 1,052-word document to family 10 minutes before the attack - Targeted Trump administration officials by rank, explicitly excluded Kash Patel - Used buckshot deliberately to minimize collateral casualties - Described Secret Service security as "actually insane" and said he walked in with multiple weapons undetected - "If I was an Iranian agent instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed" - Ended the manifesto: "It's awful. I want to throw up. Can't really recommend it. Stay in school, kids." Full manifesto: "Hello everybody! So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused. I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for “Most Wanted.” I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.) I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near. I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure. I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies. On to why I did any of this: I am a citizen of the United States of America. What my representatives do reflects on me. And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes. (Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.) While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.) Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope they’re wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who *aren’t* Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me) Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security National Guard: same as Hotel Security Hotel Employees: not targets at all Guests: not targets at all In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls) I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that. Rebuttals to objections: Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek. Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration. Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes. Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this. Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be “inconvenient” for people who aren’t the victim? This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with. Objection 3: You didn’t get them all. Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere. Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this. Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered. I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.) Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years. Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years. Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism. Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning. Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration. Thank you all for everything. Sincerely, Cole “coldForce” “Friendly Federal Assassin” Allen PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone. Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo. What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing. No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event. Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance. I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat. The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before. Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again. Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit. Actually insane. Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done. Can’t really recommend it! Stay in school, kids." Source: New York Post

English
133
418
2.6K
106K
ItsJustMe retweetet
Brit Hume
Brit Hume@brithume·
Whew! This is rough but full of truth.
LHGrey™️@grey4626

No British government ever imagined an American president might finally tell the truth about the “special relationship.” Until now. Spare me the pearl-clutching obituary from The Economist, that decaying salon of transatlantic nostalgia where the ghost of Churchill is still being pimped out like a rent-boy for Davos subscriptions. Your precious bunting of flags in the bin isn’t some tragic metaphor for Trump’s “betrayal.” It’s the autopsy photo of a one-way parasitic bargain that America has carried on its back like a drunk uncle for eighty goddamn years. And the drunk finally woke up, looked around, and said: Fuck this. This isn’t “turning his back.” This is a sovereign nation refusing to keep subsidizing a continent of strategic eunuchs who have spent decades castrating their own militaries, hollowing out their industrial bases, and importing the very pathologies that make them security liabilities rather than allies. You want the special relationship? Earn it. Reciprocate it. Stop treating the United States like an ATM with nuclear weapons. Geopolitically and militarily, the numbers don’t lie and they never have. The United States still shoulders roughly sixty percent of total NATO defense spending...$845 billion out of a collective $1.4 trillion last year. Most of your European “partners” couldn’t hit the 2% GDP target even after Russia parked tanks on Ukraine’s border and started lobbing missiles at civilian infrastructure. Britain under Starmer talks a big game about “global Britain” while quietly slashing capability, courting CCP-linked cash, and letting its own streets burn under the weight of demographic transformation and speech codes that make the old East German Stasi look libertarian. You lecture us about values while your own government criminalizes tweets and turns Rotherham into a cautionary tale the media still refuses to fully autopsy. Historically, the ledger is even more damning. We bled for you in 1917 and 1941 when your empires were on the ropes. We bankrolled your reconstruction, anchored your defense for the entire Cold War, and let you punch above your weight on the world stage because sentimental Anglosphere nostalgia still meant something. In return? Suez 1956, where you expected us to back imperial nostalgia while we were trying to contain Soviet expansion. Vietnam, where you sat it out. Iraq, where you half-assed it and then spent the next twenty years sneering at us in your broadsheets. And every single time an American president dared put America First, your commentariat wailed like Victorian widows about the death of the alliance...as if the alliance was ever meant to be a suicide pact. You’ve internalized a victimhood narrative so profound it borders on the clinical...projecting your own national decline, your own loss of agency, your own self-inflicted castration onto the one country that still possesses the will to act like a great power. Trump doesn’t “deprioritize” the relationship; he simply refuses to indulge the delusion any longer. He sees what you refuse to admit: the United Kingdom of 2026 is no longer the reliable offshore balancer of 1945. It’s a mid-tier European power wrestling with internal entropy, elite disconnect, and a demographic trajectory that makes long-term strategic partnership… let’s just say, complicated. We are sick of it. Sick of the free ride. Sick of the lectures from people whose capitals are turning into no-go zones while their defense ministers beg Washington for more F-35s and more carrier groups to patrol waters they can no longer secure themselves. Sick of the pomp, the pageantry, the royal visits, and the hand-wringing editorials that treat American self-interest as some kind of moral failing. The special relationship isn’t dead. It’s being stress-tested by reality. And reality, Mr. Economist, is a vicious bitch with a ledger in one hand and a mirror in the other. Look into it. 💀⚖️🗡️

English
217
1.7K
10.2K
521.8K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@TPostMillennial wtf is he talking about? Was he this vocal as Obama and holder went after Rosen, Risen, Atkisson, the AP? When Biden demanded silencing of “wrongthink? What has 47 done that’s remotely near “an assault on free speech?”
English
0
0
1
43
The Post Millennial
The Post Millennial@TPostMillennial·
Rep. Jamie Raskin: "There's been this terrible assault on the First Amendment, and freedom of the press, and speech, and so I thought last night would be a wonderful opportunity to try to reclaim the basic values of the country."
English
10
2
15
4.9K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@andruchk @MikeNellis Quick question - why would a “MAGA” want her dead after she just voted to remove benefits for illegal aliens? And why would a “MAGA” have “no kings” literature in his car?
English
1
0
1
63
Druchk
Druchk@andruchk·
The mor0ns are in the comments claiming that he was a democrat because he was “appointed by waltz” when everyone with a functioning brain knows that he was part of BI partisan board, a board that he was part of before WAltz even got into office, he was simply reappointed to said board becuase there was no need to make any changes. He’s an evangelical MAGA loon.
English
57
0
27
4.4K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@TinPotPourri @JacquiHeinrich @SundayBriefFNC I have not once heard the Orange one encourage violence, but have spent the last 20 years + listening to D’s demand it, encourage it, and then act shocked when it occurs. The entire “No Kings” is an absurdity that thinking people mock given President Pen and Phone existed
English
1
0
15
301
TomHB
TomHB@TinPotPourri·
@JacquiHeinrich @SundayBriefFNC Just bc he went to No Kings rallies does not mean that people that go to those rallies are like him at all. Do not even try to make that connection. The people that go to No Kings rallies are peaceful. Trump is the one that has constantly urged violence against political enemies
English
225
0
37
13.1K
Jacqui Heinrich
Jacqui Heinrich@JacquiHeinrich·
NEWS: new info on the WHCD shooting suspect, Cole Allen, from the White House. I'll be talking with President Trump about all of this in 30 minutes on @SundayBriefFNC The suspect’s written manifesto clearly stated he wanted to target administration officials. He also had a ton of anti-Trump and anti-Christian rhetoric on his social media accounts. ALLEN's brother had notified New London PD (CT) of ALLEN's alleged manifesto he had sent to his family members prior to the incident.   Secret Service and Montgomery County Police interviewed Avriana Allen, ALLEN’s sister, at their residence in Rockville, MD. The following highlights from the interview: •Allen said her brother had a tendency to make radical statements and his rhetoric constantly referenced a plan to do “something” to fix the issues with today’s world. •Confirmed ALLEN purchased two handguns and a shotgun from Cap Tactical Firearms and kept them stored at their parent’s home and that their parents were unaware that ALLEN was keeping the firearms in the home. •ALLEN would regularly go to the shooting range to train with his firearms •ALLEN was part of a group called ‘The Wide Awakes’ •ALLEN attended a ‘No Kings’ protest in California at some point
English
502
2.5K
6.7K
979.5K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@DJanitis @FinalTelegraph Of course D’s will publicly denounce the violence… yet they continue inciting while insisting on The “both sides” absurdities. This is a pattern as old as time, and they will not cease
English
0
0
2
47
Daina Janitis
Daina Janitis@DJanitis·
Tonight’s shooting was condemned across the political spectrum – including by Democrats who called the attack “unacceptable” and said “violence has no place in a democracy.” Saying “EVERY DEMOCRAT WANTS YOU DEAD” is propaganda, not “political realism,” and this kind of all‑or‑nothing language is what actually pushes the U.S. closer to the mass‑violence examples you claim to fear.
English
59
0
12
4.1K
Saggezza Eterna
Saggezza Eterna@FinalTelegraph·
EVERY DEMOCRAT WANTS YOU DEAD. EVERY ONE. Every single one of them harbors this desire. They leave the physical act of pulling the trigger to others. The moment the bullet finds its mark, the masks drop and the celebration begins. "For the common good." "To protect our democracy." These are the same blood-soaked incantations they have recited since 2016. They will claim violence has no place in our politics while immediately pivoting to label MAGA as the real threat. The translation is clear. Your death is an unfortunate necessity demanded by the Republic. This represents the logical endpoint of a decade-long campaign of demonization. They call Trump Hitler. They label MAGA a cult. They equate border enforcement with racism and election skepticism with insurrection. Every institution they control from the media and academia to the DOJ and Big Tech has spent years programming their followers to view conservatives strictly as vermin. When the vermin start dying, the faithful refuse to mourn. They meme. They ratio. They trend phrases like "one down, millions to go." History is littered with regimes that spoke in the language of the common good while stacking bodies. The Jacobins, the Bolsheviks, and the Red Guards all began with noble rhetoric and ended with mass graves. The modern American Left has simply updated the vocabulary to weaponize terms like equity, sustainability, and the idea that democracy dies in darkness. It is the exact same meat grinder operating under new branding. Their rhetoric is its merciless clarity. It destroys the comfortable illusion of equal culpability between both sides. One side argues policy. The other side argues that your existence is a hate crime. There is no negotiating with that level of hostility. Reaching across the aisle is impossible when the opposition views the aisle itself as a moral obscenity. The path forward requires us to stop pretending. We must stop apologizing for noticing reality. We must stop ceding the moral high ground to people who cheer when we bleed. The shooting tonight is Exhibit A in the case for political realism. They want us erased. We want to win. Only one of those goals is compatible with survival.
Saggezza Eterna tweet media
English
357
3.9K
10.2K
723.5K
ItsJustMe retweetet
Guy Benson
Guy Benson@guypbenson·
Melissa Hortman was killed by a Democratic appointee who thought he was acting on the orders of Gov. Tim Walz (D) to advance Walz’s career. Her murder was condemned by everyone. The first person to “allegedly” (?) take a shot at Trump donated to a left-wing group the day Joe Biden was inaugurated. It’s notable that his two counter-examples of right-wing political violence actually...aren’t. This is not to say leftists have a monopoly on political violence. They do not — though in recent years, they’ve been far more problematic on this front, especially when it comes to glorifying, celebrating and justifying political violence. It is, however, to say that he’s a very dishonest person & that we are indeed confronting a leftist-driven political violence problem in America right now.
Stephen L. Miller@redsteeze

Loving Substack's New Media party.

English
545
1.2K
4.8K
670.3K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@ScottGreenfield lol by Weissman? It’s astonishing the man continues to hold a license to practice
English
0
0
16
297
ItsJustMe retweetet
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
What an absolute GIFT. I get to spend all day on Sunday explaining why Andrew Weissman is a duplicitous moron, why he was reversed 9-0 by the Supreme Court, and why his criticisms of the SPLC indictment make my case for me. The more people rely on him for ANYTHING the more disconnected from reality they appear.
Scott Greenfield@ScottGreenfield

An excellent explanation of what's wrong with the indictment against the SPLC. justsecurity.org/137171/indictm…

English
22
377
1.5K
97.7K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@guy_mfg @ZelenskyyUa Because the US continues to pay - they are not “unreliable” but their citizens seem sick unto death of working to send/borrow billions into an unaccountable hole
English
1
0
0
20
Mfg Guy
Mfg Guy@guy_mfg·
@ZelenskyyUa Notice none of this is about the US. Europe has written us off as unreliable. They’re not wrong.
English
1
0
1
461
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський
The first tranche under the approved €90 billion European support loan will be directed toward domestic production for Ukraine’s defense. This includes drones and the entire miltech sector. Second – energy. By next winter, we must protect everything we can to the maximum extent possible. For this purpose, in addition to local budgets, a portion of the funds will be allocated from the central budget. Funding will be sourced, in particular, from these tranches under the €90 billion package. We expect to allocate several billion from it specifically to protect the energy sector. We discussed this during meetings with European leaders in Cyprus. We also held meetings in the Middle East and reached a number of arrangements – particularly in the energy sector. Ukraine now consumes several times more diesel than many other countries. One of the reasons is the war, but our army does not face a diesel shortage. There is also sufficient diesel for the functioning of the economy – for agricultural producers and civilian transport. And this volume of diesel fuel that Ukraine needs doesn’t just come out of thin air – we have agreements in place with the Middle East. We have also opened a route through the Caucasus, in particular to ensure diesel supplies for civilians. In other words, we have several countries that are helping us and guaranteeing stable supply for our people. We are grateful to each of these countries, and this is exactly how we build our cooperation – so that it delivers mutual results and strengthens Ukraine.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський tweet media
English
612
1K
4.8K
115K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@SenatorAndyKim Sir, it is your and your cohorts that fuel this behavior. You seem to WANT the violence and revel in it so you can post these inane “violence has no place” placards.
English
0
0
1
12
Senator Andy Kim
Senator Andy Kim@SenatorAndyKim·
I’m shocked by images and first hand accounts of a shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner. The level of threats and violence fueled by a broken politics is disturbing and unacceptable. Even in the most divided of times, violence has no place. It’s time we realize that we’re a part of something bigger than any one of us, and come together as Americans to denounce such horrific actions.
English
403
35
221
17.5K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@cathamand @ScottJenningsKY Unfortunately they do not. The ghost filibuster prevents the made up 60 vote majority to enact most anything
English
0
0
5
83
Scott Jennings
Scott Jennings@ScottJenningsKY·
I've been on the air live twice now when someone has tried to kill the President. I worry about President Trump every day. I worry about these events. The fact that DHS has been unfunded for 70 days in this environment is outrageous. Every American should be outraged by it.
English
1.7K
13.4K
74.5K
685.4K
ItsJustMe
ItsJustMe@ItsJustMe44·
@Veridant @HarmeetKDhillon Because women can be cruel to each other? I’ve spent a lifetime mentally cataloguing what folks were at what wedding, and if I can recycle for the next one lol
English
0
0
3
58
Tony Lentini
Tony Lentini@Veridant·
@HarmeetKDhillon Why is wearing a dress a second time such a taboo thing? I just don't get it.
English
9
0
22
1.1K