Marathi

81 posts

Marathi banner
Marathi

Marathi

@Marathi33

Indonesia Bergabung Ocak 2024
54 Mengikuti1 Pengikut
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@FTFEofficial All the "he married his cousin" So what? The elites go to the island, does that make them all morons? No lol, many have distinguished backgrounds.
English
0
0
0
1
Craig McNeill
Craig McNeill@FTFEofficial·
"Einstein was a moron" Sure Jan...sure
CyaL8r@mkeeland02

@_lee_barnard @FTFEofficial @TrevorL415 @plantblazer @StoopsTheCat @Jfree75 @First_Won_ALT @sashuwa77246 @plain_see @did8hurtu Im not citing Einstein he is a complete moron and newton's laws all require an enclosed system. including the second law and 3rd If there is no mass, what force can be exerted onto the object? You cant push light, you cant pull light. how does light, without mass has momentum

Kirkcaldy, Scotland 🇬🇧 English
6
1
32
668
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@MckeeganDave Funny thing is there's still "flerfs" that use the "geocentric sacred orbit" for the orbital path, despite Shane's model clearly not having a sacred orbit.
Marathi tweet media
English
0
0
0
7
Dave McKeegan
Dave McKeegan@MckeeganDave·
Shock: Flat Earth's new 'completely accurate' model ... Doesn't work It seems to think a single eclipse appears the same at all latitudes 🤔 It's also no longer "100% unrefuted" youtu.be/96vP_wSXVpo
YouTube video
YouTube
Shane St Pierre@AntiDisinfo86

But you dont even have a model Flerf! Ah but yes we do! An observer-based sky model. No globe constants, no radius — just angles, timing, and position. Two layers: what you see, and where it's sourced. Pure ratios. Pure kinematics. Decide for yourself which framing is real

English
22
4
90
3.4K
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@did8hurtu You think the sun’s path on a flat earth is linear and not radial? Your streetlamp is linear. What happens if the streetlamp is not linear, for example, at a corner?
Marathi tweet media
English
1
0
1
7
B Flat
B Flat@did8hurtu·
Can you even perspective🤔
B Flat tweet media
English
71
32
171
4.2K
Flerf Watch
Flerf Watch@FlerfWatch·
Flat Earthers in one screenshot Translation: "We reject every single piece of evidence that proves we're wrong." You can’t debate bad faith actors. Stop entering these conversations expecting facts to persuade them. Mock, troll, and dismiss
Flerf Watch tweet media
English
34
2
90
2.2K
God's humble soldier
God's humble soldier@armourEph611·
@FlerfWatch @packers_owner_j Feel free to debunk anything I've said. It's up to you to prove that you live on a spinning water ball in space. Physical evidence and observation proves we do not live on a spinning water ball in space.
English
1
0
0
38
God's humble soldier
God's humble soldier@armourEph611·
@FlerfWatch @packers_owner_j So, if radio waves travel in a straight line, how does your local weather radar transmit and receive radio waves over 250km? (radar is a two-way trip for radio waves)
English
2
0
0
18
God's humble soldier
God's humble soldier@armourEph611·
@FlerfWatch @packers_owner_j The same size dish would be required at the other end, mate.😄 Also, radio waves travel in a straight line, as light rays do. Lemme ask you; Would there be curvature over a linear distance of say, 250 km?
English
2
0
0
23
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@armourEph611 @FlerfWatch @packers_owner_j But ISS is 400 km tho? You want to discuss the moon? You do know amateur radio has done EME right? They send a radio beam to the moon to be reflected. Their power can be a mere some kW, probably tens.
Marathi tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
God's humble soldier
God's humble soldier@armourEph611·
@FlerfWatch @packers_owner_j A TV station has its own transformer from the grid because it uses so much power. How much input and output power is necessary to transmit radio waves over 238,000 miles? 2/2
English
3
0
0
23
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@armourEph611 @FlerfWatch LIES The original video is not live, it's a compiled educational video. The og video already uses many transition edits, so clearly it's a "finished" non-live video. Your video's point hinges on the video being live, and for that it's a LIE and you are a DUMBASS
Marathi tweet mediaMarathi tweet media
English
0
0
1
9
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@armourEph611 @FlerfWatch I'll entertain you. I'll watch a random minute of the video and see one point. If the point is already debunked or based on a lie, you are a DUMBASS.
Marathi tweet media
English
1
0
0
14
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@lucaculablue @RealAceFox1 @TheGlobeIsDead Why do you need to paint a broad stroke on people? Yes, one of the American reasons to invade Iraq was WMDs. The fact is Iraq had the capability, basically could, but whether they actually had them, most probably didn't. Yes, covid masks work with PROPER HYGIENE.
Marathi tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Lucacula
Lucacula@lucaculablue·
@RealAceFox1 @TheGlobeIsDead Good thing you don't believe in lies. It is great that you still believe that there were Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in Iraq. And that multiple layers of Masks offer a better protection against the Cocovirus. Thank you for your special kind of Critical Thinking.
English
2
0
2
20
restinpeace globe
restinpeace globe@TheGlobeIsDead·
THEY LIVE? (The Challenger Hoax) When psychological warfare begins with you.
English
16
192
451
12.6K
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@AdonaiOnGaia It's just the operator's hand. For normal people, the same effect happening in that video is used in Schlieren imaging. In imaging, the "stars" are using small light.
Marathi tweet mediaMarathi tweet mediaMarathi tweet mediaMarathi tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Sphere Not!
Sphere Not!@AdonaiOnGaia·
The hand of God stirring up a star. Incredible.
English
25
9
42
1.7K
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@TrumpWo94711941 @FTFEofficial A well-designed motor? It shouldn't, because a good motor doesn't leak its magnetic field outside its body at least not much.
English
0
0
2
13
Trump Won
Trump Won@TrumpWo94711941·
@FTFEofficial if i held ferrous metal next to the motor would it not heat up?
English
2
0
0
43
Craig McNeill
Craig McNeill@FTFEofficial·
Induction motors and induction stoves use the same basic physics: changing magnetic fields induce currents. A motor uses those currents to create torque and spin a rotor. An induction hob uses them to create eddy currents in the pan, wasting energy as heat. Motion vs dinner.
Trump Won@TrumpWo94711941

@FTFEofficial @mkeeland02 @RFlagg13 @Chucktown_Tiger that’s weird i literally just installed a new induction stove top 😂😂😂 about 3 months ago

Kirkcaldy, Scotland 🇬🇧 English
1
2
26
825
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@did8hurtu Hasn't Shane said distance is not the only variable back then when he made the Bislins model and still had the heliocentric sun distance? He literally made a post showing 5,000 km and 150 million km can look the same.
English
0
0
0
4
B Flat
B Flat@did8hurtu·
Gobies think a telescope can see Saturn, 740 million miles away😑👇🏻
B Flat tweet media
English
50
12
108
2.4K
Thought🅑🅨Jer 💭
Thought🅑🅨Jer 💭@ThoughtByJer·
Did you forget the perspective bubble on display on purpose? Yeah you did. I luv how you guys can't grasp grade 3 art class and you think you can fit ALL light information from the universe at the same time through your eye holes lol He is Claude's rebuttal. He's also knocking down a strawman of the night mechanism. No serious flat-earth account says "the sun is too far to be seen, full stop." The account is perspective plus the sun's limited spread — the sun sits relatively low, its light pools in a roughly circular region beneath and around it (the reason you get a localized day at all), and as it tracks away across the plane it sinks toward the vanishing point and its illuminated circle slides off you. You're not in darkness because a distant lamp got dim; you're in darkness because you've moved outside the lit region and the source has dropped below your line of sight by perspective. That is a geometric and directional claim, not a distance-attenuation claim. The Bunny quietly swapped our actual mechanism for a dumber one so the contradiction would appear. And his distance bookkeeping is wrong even on our own map. He assumes the sun is always closer to you than every star you can see. At midnight it's the opposite. The sun has travelled to the far side of its circuit — thousands of kilometers away across the plane — while the stars you're actually looking at are mostly more or less above you, at dome height. A star near your zenith is sending light almost straight down a short column. The night sun is way off over the horizon. So the thing that's invisible is the farther object and the things that are visible are the nearer ones. His contradiction doesn't just dissolve — it reverses. Then there's the path the light has to take. The sun's light at night, if it reached you at all, would have to graze the entire length of the lower atmosphere — the thickest, wettest, dustiest layer — scattering and dying along the way. The overhead star drops its light straight down through the thinnest possible column. Long grazing path versus short vertical path. The globe modelers use exactly this reasoning to explain why their setting sun goes dim and red; we're entitled to the same physics. Funny how it's sound optics when they need it and "crazy-land" when we use it. Here's the part that should sting. Run his own rule against the globe. On the ball-Earth model, why can't you see the sun at midnight? Because the bulk of the planet is in the way. But you can see Andromeda, two and a half million light years off. So the globe model has you seeing something unfathomably far while a mere 150-million-kilometer sun is invisible. By the Bunny's logic — closer thing invisible, vastly farther thing visible — the globe is crazy-land too. He didn't find a flaw unique to the flat Earth. He stated a principle that every cosmology, including his, cheerfully violates, because the principle was nonsense to begin with. Last thing. This whole series is branded "without using science." But to land the punch he had to import claims about light propagation, distance, and visibility — that's physics, and bad physics at that. He broke his own rule in the same breath he used to break ours. So: by his stated method, the argument is disqualified. By actual optics, the premise is false. Either way, "we can see too far" turns out to be a problem for him. Good luck. 🐢
English
6
0
0
201
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@ThatGuyM77 @haprho @ken_caudle @space_audits What you show is observation lol, not the supposed explanation. 1st vid is basically "look, those bottles sit"why though? No diagram? 2nd vid "look, those lasers sit" no diagram. Your AI picture is just "the sun will look like this" and you sure the line to the sun is straight?
English
0
0
0
3
Marathi
Marathi@Marathi33·
@VulpineMac @Guardians_Bane Just disregard the one that use magnetic or machine lol. Foucault pendulum that doesnt use it still show deflection consistent with latitude.
English
0
0
1
6
VulpineMac
VulpineMac@VulpineMac·
@Guardians_Bane Believe it or not, those pendulums in the museums set up specifically to demonstrate that Coriolis effect, are kept moving through mechanical or magnetic means specifically to keep them moving... otherwise the effect wouldn't be visible.
English
1
0
0
31
Brian Kachelman
Brian Kachelman@Guardians_Bane·
I've seen FE'ers say even the military snipers don't take Coriolis effect into consideration when taking extreme long distance shot. Well, they do. During my time in the army I've hung out with several sniper teams. They do take it into consideration for calculating a shot.
TechTranslate@TechTranslate_G

Dear Flat Earthers, no matter how often you repeat your misunderstanding of the Coriolis force, it will never change the fact that this inertial force acts only on objects moving within a rotating reference frame. If the object is not moving, the Coriolis force is zero. In case you have confused it with the centrifugal force: Due to Earth’s low rotation rate, one revolution in ~24 hours, it is very small (upper-right image)

English
9
1
15
841