R Sevan

🚨 Utah’s judicial retention system is broken. Voters get filtered, subjective survey metrics from the legal community, not objective data on how judges rule in their cases. Retention rates remain extremely high because most voters have almost zero usable information. Ballots show ONLY the judge’s name and a vague “visit judges.utah.gov.” The Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (JPEC) offers only lawyer opinion scores on “temperament” without critical information such as decisions, reversal rates, civil/criminal patterns, or records on rulings like the Prop 4 map. Sadly, it appears the Utah State Bar is crossing the line by using mandatory member dues to push political statements telling voters to ignore specific rulings and to trust the flawed JPEC system. That’s not “improving justice” but instead appears to be self-serving advocacy shielding judges from voter accountability. Are JPEC surveys filled out by attorneys who appear before the judges, judges rating each other, and court staff who work for the judges truly independent?! More information and objective data reporting is needed so voters can make up their own minds. This low-information design must change. We need legislation NOW to fix it by requiring information posted on the web: • State-published judge profiles (education, career background, years served, courts). • Standardized, de-identified reports on civil & criminal decisions for each judge. • Reversal/overturn stats included. • Clear ballot summaries and direct links to full data. Voters deserve facts, not lawyer-filtered generalizations when it comes to voting for the judicial branch. The facts should speak for themselves with respect to each Judge’s record. Real transparency = real accountability. Demand reform. Follow: @rsevan45 #JudicialTransparency @BurgessOwens @Manhattva @VoteTrevorLee @GOPUtah @BasedMikeLee @JStuartAdams @LindsayOnAir @MarinasHammer @HarmeetKDhillon @realDonaldTrump @StephenM @glennbeck @bluelivesmtr @elonmusk @phil_lyman

INBOX: The @UtahStateBar is responding to the @UtahGOP chair and other top Republicans who specifically called for party members to vote against retaining two Utah Supreme Court justices up for retention this fall over the redistricting rulings.

🔥🔥🔥It was proved in court that Dems disenfranchised millions of voters by drawing voter district lines based on race which is illegal, but now they attempt to play the victim after being caught violating our Constitution. SCOTUS correctly struck down Louisiana’s racial gerrymander 6-3 in Louisiana v. Callais. Race was the predominant factor in drawing the second majority-Black district. The map failed strict scrutiny under the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause because §2 of the Voting Rights Act does not require states to sort voters by skin color or ignore traditional neutral principles like compactness and geography. Democrats have weaponized race in redistricting for years to pack minority voters into safe seats for partisan gain, diluting the votes of millions of Americans. They were the aggressors despite their disingenuous claims to the contrary. The Supreme Court just ruled their conduct was unconstitutional, so now they cry victim. District lines must be color-blind, not race-based. The Constitution demands it. Justice restored. #ColorBlindJustice​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Repost this. Follow: @rsevan45 @BasedMikeLee @CurtisUT @DataRepublican @ScottPresler @RapidResponse47 @StephenM @scotus_wire @SCOTUSblog @HarmeetKDhillon @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @Manhattva @franriggs @COSProject @glennbeck @bluelivesmtr @UtahCollegeReps

🔥🔥🔥It was proved in court that Dems disenfranchised millions of voters by drawing voter district lines based on race which is illegal, but now they attempt to play the victim after being caught violating our Constitution. SCOTUS correctly struck down Louisiana’s racial gerrymander 6-3 in Louisiana v. Callais. Race was the predominant factor in drawing the second majority-Black district. The map failed strict scrutiny under the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause because §2 of the Voting Rights Act does not require states to sort voters by skin color or ignore traditional neutral principles like compactness and geography. Democrats have weaponized race in redistricting for years to pack minority voters into safe seats for partisan gain, diluting the votes of millions of Americans. They were the aggressors despite their disingenuous claims to the contrary. The Supreme Court just ruled their conduct was unconstitutional, so now they cry victim. District lines must be color-blind, not race-based. The Constitution demands it. Justice restored. #ColorBlindJustice​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Repost this. Follow: @rsevan45 @BasedMikeLee @CurtisUT @DataRepublican @ScottPresler @RapidResponse47 @StephenM @scotus_wire @SCOTUSblog @HarmeetKDhillon @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @Manhattva @franriggs @COSProject @glennbeck @bluelivesmtr @UtahCollegeReps

🔥🔥🔥It was proved in court that Dems disenfranchised millions of voters by drawing voter district lines based on race which is illegal, but now they attempt to play the victim after being caught violating our Constitution. SCOTUS correctly struck down Louisiana’s racial gerrymander 6-3 in Louisiana v. Callais. Race was the predominant factor in drawing the second majority-Black district. The map failed strict scrutiny under the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause because §2 of the Voting Rights Act does not require states to sort voters by skin color or ignore traditional neutral principles like compactness and geography. Democrats have weaponized race in redistricting for years to pack minority voters into safe seats for partisan gain, diluting the votes of millions of Americans. They were the aggressors despite their disingenuous claims to the contrary. The Supreme Court just ruled their conduct was unconstitutional, so now they cry victim. District lines must be color-blind, not race-based. The Constitution demands it. Justice restored. #ColorBlindJustice​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Repost this. Follow: @rsevan45 @BasedMikeLee @CurtisUT @DataRepublican @ScottPresler @RapidResponse47 @StephenM @scotus_wire @SCOTUSblog @HarmeetKDhillon @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @Manhattva @franriggs @COSProject @glennbeck @bluelivesmtr @UtahCollegeReps

@JohnCornyn @WSJ The NRSC (National Republican Senatorial Committee) is wasting tens of millions of dollars on Senator Cornyn’s election. 👉If you donated to the NRSC, you can request a REFUND👈 If you don’t REFUND, it will spend the $ on Cassidy & Cornyn. ⬇️

@ScottPresler If many of us posted a link to the above post in response to Senator Cornyns’ posts on X, I wonder what would result? 🤔🚨

@ScottPresler If many of us posted a link to the above post in response to Senator Cornyns’ posts on X, I wonder what would result? 🤔🚨

@JohnCornyn Did you know that you can request a 👉REFUND👈 if you donated to Senator Cornyn? Since the NRSC & SLF are spending tens of millions of dollars on Cornyn, he doesn’t need your $. Request a refund here: ⬇️ (All they had to do was pass the SAVE America Act 🦇)

Blake Moore, a Republican that was endorsed by @realDonaldTrump, lobbied for Democrats to steal a congressional seat in Utah. (Why wasn't Trump told this?) He was successful. If Republicans lose the midterms, thank Blake Moore.