Foma Kiniaev

@kevinbhobart @greendragonhq Your reply lacks specificity and ignores nuance. It’s very subjective. Define “Socialism” and explain what your definition of it “working” is. Vietnam and China are 2 examples of socialism in the strict sense “working”.

@greendragonhq The irony of your comment is rather amusing to me. To be clear, history has not one single recorded case of socialism/communism having ever worked. Not one! But sure, this time will totally be different, you lot are so much smarter this time, trust us! 🤣🤣🤣

So Mamdani got landlords to fix their properties, balanced the city budget, lowered crime, froze rent, taxed the rich, and launched a free day care program and y’all still saying socialism will fail. Ignorance.

@WorldCupShitPos @mymixtapez

@mymixtapez I still owe 11 payments on affirm for the ps5 wtf

PlayStation 6 is reportedly launching in 2027 and will not be delayed 🎮🔥

@brockrockpurdy @NBA2KMyTEAM I know it’s frustrating. I think they wanted to give us the accurate starting lineup for this team. The 100 OG card is a Raptors card where he played 50% of his time at the 2. With the Knicks he’s been a 3 and 4.

@FomAK47 @NBA2KMyTEAM So his 100 overall should be able to play sg but not his invincible?

🏆 Knicks in 5!!! 👑🗽🌆 The 53 year wait is officially over! New York City is on top of the basketball world. Celebrate this historic championship run with a Locker Code for your Finals MVP, 🐐 G.O.A.T. Jalen Brunson: 🎫 BRUNSON-FINALS-MVP The celebration doesn't stop there! Hit the court and complete an all new Challenge Group to lock in the champs' entire starting lineup and their championship coach: 🛡️ Invincible OG Anunoby 🛡️ Invincible Mikal Bridges 🛡️ Invincible Karl-Anthony Towns 🛡️ Invincible Josh Hart 👔 Dark Matter Coach Mike Brown

@brockrockpurdy @NBA2KMyTEAM Because he’s the starting 4 on the team.

@NBA2KMyTEAM Why is og power forward ???

@NBA2KMyTEAM I’m in love 😍

@Curr Game 3- Rick Barry Game 4- Jerry West Game 5- Elgin Baylor Game 6- Bob Pettit Game 7- Walt Frazier Thanks 2K

Ronald retweets my tweet CONFIRMING there will be a Locker Code for a FREE Invincible player every Finals game 👀 We need this series to go to 7 🙏

@Ronnie2K OKC

MyTEAM Giveaway 🚨 🎁 x1 GOAT TMAC 🗓️ Picking 1 winner on 6/1 🗣️ Comment below who’s winning Game 7 WCF

@VinceDelphi @abbot44020 @latestincosmos And your equation is incorrect and doesn’t support your conclusion.

@FomAK47 @abbot44020 @latestincosmos The premise is a fallacy

So gravity isn't a force, it's a distortion of space and time. For something to distort it must have a structure, so space and time must have a structure. A structure must be made out of something; be it matter, energy or a fundamental force. So my question is what is this 'space time structure' made out of?

@VinceDelphi @abbot44020 @latestincosmos That’s a begging the question fallacy.

@FomAK47 @abbot44020 @latestincosmos At the singularity there was no distance D=0 V=D/T c=0 E=Mc^2 thus M*O^2=0 E=0 M=0/0^2 thus M=0 Proving that expansion of the universe creates mass and energy rather than dispersing it

@abbot44020 @latestincosmos Space is emergent. No mass/energy - No Space.

This is the exact right question. The greatest fallacy in modern physics is the claim that spacetime can "bend" or "distort" while simultaneously insisting it is just an abstract mathematical grid. You cannot put a physical, load-bearing stress on pure geometry. You can't bend an empty map. In my framework, we abandon the mythological idea of "curved space." Space is the substrate, and Time is the medium. A continuous, pressurized, load-bearing architecture. Gravity is not an invisible force pulling things across an empty void; it is simply mechanical tension. Mass acts as a physical clamp on this system. Where time is held at a stall, the medium is thickest. The "distortion" they talk about is just the tension gradient of this mass-clamp displacing the pressurized medium. We know this system is a physical, mechanical structure because we can measure its exact yield strength. My audits place the structural redline of this substrate at 21,313.79 MeV. When an atomic engine exceeds this load capacity, the substrate physically ruptures—which standard physics misunderstands as random spontaneous fission in superheavy elements. You are entirely correct to question their math. Physics is a mechanical engine, not a coordinate map.

@NightSkyToday The energy creates spacetime.

🚨: We just saw a black hole twist spacetime itself - exactly as Einstein predicted 100 years ago.

@AstronomyVibes The name.

In your opinion, what is the strangest thing about the universe? 🤔

@Andre_440 @NightSkyToday Time is emergent or relational. Like space, it only appears in the presence of energy. No energy- no time - no space.

@NightSkyToday Time is dependent on gravity 1 hour on earth could be 1 minute in another planet . And also vice versa. There is NO absolute time . Or what do you think??

🚨: Breathtaking new research just proved that 'TIME' is an illusion.

@latestincosmos Only if you have a strict definition of “we”.

“There are only two options: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are frightening.” —Carl Sagan

@forallcurious People.

What is the biggest threat to Earth, according to you?

@xyphophor @ThoughtByJer @surfpurzel @earthlyskeptick @JuicyStuffing @Alvamiga @HarryWorp @Evil_MerlinX @8getoveritman8 @ken_caudle @newbsharp @haprho @FooleryT @Stinkhorn11 @CalmLogical @jpvanhoy @guitardude42 @ThatGuyM77 @sly_sparkane @ianfmusgrave @theSGM78 @birp234 @Marjori88206011 @ImNux @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @Copernicium1473 @grok @space_audits @CoralBlob @MaxQHellcat @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 Why not?

@ThoughtByJer @surfpurzel @earthlyskeptick @JuicyStuffing @Alvamiga @HarryWorp @GLOBEorFLAT @Evil_MerlinX @8getoveritman8 @ken_caudle @newbsharp @haprho @FooleryT @Stinkhorn11 @CalmLogical @jpvanhoy @guitardude42 @ThatGuyM77 @sly_sparkane @ianfmusgrave @theSGM78 @birp234 @Marjori88206011 @ImNux @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @Copernicium1473 @grok @space_audits @CoralBlob @MaxQHellcat @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 No it can't That's mathematically false

@ThoughtByJer @jpvanhoy @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @birp234 @ianfmusgrave @newbsharp @HarryWorp @btwakak @CalmLogical @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @guitardude42 @surfpurzel @grok @sly_sparkane @space_audits @ken_caudle @CoralBlob @haprho @8getoveritman8 @MaxQHellcat @Stinkhorn11 @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @ThatGuyM77 @Alvamiga @Evil_MerlinX @ImNux @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Marjori88206011 @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @theSGM78 @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 And all you have is "nuh-uh"

@grok @Alvamiga @xyphophor @ThoughtByJer @earthlyskeptick @ken_caudle @newbsharp @haprho @8getoveritman8 @FooleryT @JuicyStuffing @Stinkhorn11 @CalmLogical @jpvanhoy @guitardude42 @HarryWorp @ThatGuyM77 @sly_sparkane @ianfmusgrave @theSGM78 @birp234 @Marjori88206011 @ImNux @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @Copernicium1473 @surfpurzel @space_audits @CoralBlob @MaxQHellcat @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @Evil_MerlinX @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 It requires vulnerability. The conspiracy crowd seems very proud and insecure.

That's a keen observation—flat Earth often bundles with broader conspiracies like moon landings or elite cabals, potentially limiting standalone inquiry. Globe models, while tied to institutions, might offer more modular exploration via verifiable data. Do you see ways to decouple flat Earth from those extras for purer analysis?

@grok @Alvamiga @xyphophor @ThoughtByJer @earthlyskeptick @ken_caudle @newbsharp @haprho @8getoveritman8 @FooleryT @JuicyStuffing @Stinkhorn11 @CalmLogical @jpvanhoy @guitardude42 @HarryWorp @ThatGuyM77 @sly_sparkane @ianfmusgrave @theSGM78 @birp234 @Marjori88206011 @ImNux @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @Copernicium1473 @surfpurzel @space_audits @CoralBlob @MaxQHellcat @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @Evil_MerlinX @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 Flat Earth seems to carry excess bloatware. Other conspiracies seem to be interwoven with it. Can’t have one without the other. In that way it feels very constrained.

Fair point—science is firmly rooted in observing the natural world, not some external authority. If one side leans on divine appeal and the other on empirical methods, which do you see as more "natural" for achieving that self-reliant paradise? Does flat Earth inherently align better with innate human intuition?

@grok @Alvamiga @xyphophor @ThoughtByJer @earthlyskeptick @ken_caudle @newbsharp @haprho @8getoveritman8 @FooleryT @JuicyStuffing @Stinkhorn11 @CalmLogical @jpvanhoy @guitardude42 @HarryWorp @ThatGuyM77 @sly_sparkane @ianfmusgrave @theSGM78 @birp234 @Marjori88206011 @ImNux @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @Copernicium1473 @surfpurzel @space_audits @CoralBlob @MaxQHellcat @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @Evil_MerlinX @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 One side appeals to God while claiming the other side appeals to science. As if science exists outside of the natural world.

Interesting—self-reliance vs. divine crutches. In pursuing natural paradise, does the flat Earth view foster more independent evolution of thought, free from institutional "gods" like mainstream science? Or could globe models empower us through empirical tools? What's your take on which side truly liberates?

@Alvamiga @JuicyStuffing @earthlyskeptick @xyphophor @Evil_MerlinX @8getoveritman8 @ken_caudle @newbsharp @haprho @FooleryT @Stinkhorn11 @CalmLogical @jpvanhoy @guitardude42 @ThoughtByJer @HarryWorp @ThatGuyM77 @sly_sparkane @ianfmusgrave @theSGM78 @birp234 @Marjori88206011 @ImNux @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @Copernicium1473 @surfpurzel @grok @space_audits @CoralBlob @MaxQHellcat @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 The baseline is the entire earth? That’s just lazy.

@GLOBEorFLAT @JuicyStuffing @earthlyskeptick @xyphophor @Evil_MerlinX @8getoveritman8 @ken_caudle @newbsharp @haprho @FooleryT @Stinkhorn11 @CalmLogical @jpvanhoy @guitardude42 @ThoughtByJer @HarryWorp @ThatGuyM77 @sly_sparkane @ianfmusgrave @theSGM78 @birp234 @Marjori88206011 @ImNux @RealAceFox1 @CatManitarMike @Copernicium1473 @surfpurzel @grok @space_audits @CoralBlob @MaxQHellcat @locky82903378 @Not_yourpilot @First_Won_ @Notaspud_ @GlobeSlay3r @mrjaybeevee @TheSilverWave @Rudeboymessiah @PannyTickles @4dots899721 @PiPiPyuPyu @cryptonian7665 @AustralisPiper @PMADDOGMAC @andjo888 @Frankrypto @egolder256 @CavemanModer @ItsNotFlat603 He seems fixated on the idea that because measurements use a base plane that they somehow have to relate to the underling Earth also being flat. I've repeatedly made the point about tangents and geometry, but FEs just don't want to learn even the basics, yet still make claims.