WalkBikeNow

3.8K posts

WalkBikeNow banner
WalkBikeNow

WalkBikeNow

@WalkBikeNow

I like talking about livable places. And utility and social and kid cycling. And places for all ages and abilities. The revolution will not be single file.

New York City Katılım Kasım 2017
1.3K Takip Edilen520 Takipçiler
WalkBikeNow retweetledi
Trashed Panda
Trashed Panda@RailroadRaccoon·
I don't think it get's talked about enough just how extensive the Boston Commuter rail network is:
Trashed Panda tweet media
English
88
52
1.9K
280.2K
WalkBikeNow
WalkBikeNow@WalkBikeNow·
@KittDennis @the_transit_guy @pitdesi Government took on huge debt to kick start all that in 1987. Also, the high visibility rail service people cite in Japan is on the densely populated routes. The more rural routes are government supported.
English
0
0
0
16
Dennis Kitt
Dennis Kitt@KittDennis·
@the_transit_guy @pitdesi Disagree. The one place private rail works—Japan—has full vertical integration: owning tracks, stations, real estate, development, etc. This enables the TOD they’re so famous for. Separating operations from track ownership also hurts operational reliability, e.g. the UK.
English
3
1
1
169
Scorpion
Scorpion@ScorpionChekIn·
@the_transit_guy @pitdesi I think our network built by rail companies in the 1800s says otherwise, is only that commute rail in america makes no sense outside a couple cities like ny
English
5
0
4
244
WalkBikeNow
WalkBikeNow@WalkBikeNow·
@BobaCyclist Exactly. Have @NYC_DOT show up within hours with the big stones and create traffic calming. No design, no engagement process. Just narrow the intersection with huge rocks. Every time. Safe streets. Quiet streets.
English
0
0
1
21
Shein Gillis
Shein Gillis@silv3rmorning·
@Colin_d_m Whats that unelectrified bit on the west side of manhattan?
English
3
0
0
1.6K
Colin
Colin@Colin_d_m·
NYC is so far ahead on rail electrification
Colin tweet mediaColin tweet mediaColin tweet mediaColin tweet media
English
16
18
535
152.8K
WalkBikeNow
WalkBikeNow@WalkBikeNow·
This. There are many oversimplifications out there. Government is always involved, there is no pure free market anywhere. Government assumed huge debt in 1987 as part of the Japanese rail transformation.
Law in Japan@Colin_P_A_Jones

I worked on one stage of the JR privatization and this is greatly oversimplifies what actually happened and ignores some important realities. First, three of the seven JR companies (Hokkaido, Shikoku, Cargo) are still 100% government owned, and were probably never expected to be viable as public enterprises. I was surprised that JR Kyushu was successfully privatized completely - and got Shinkansen - because at the time I was involved (in another company) the conventional wisdom was that only the Honshu companies could succeed as private enterprises. Second, the privatization also involved parking a large chunk of liabilities in a special entity that was NOT privatized. In fact the part of the privatization I worked on was delayed because the government unilaterally decided the new JR companies had not taken enough of the JNR pension liabilities on their books and added some more. Probably one of the most significant aspects of the privatization was the public service workforce reduction it entailed but that was a problem for the government, not the JR companies. Third, the JR companies became private (but first government-owned) companies with valuable assets (the commuter and HSR rail networks) build with public funds as well as a portfolio of highly desirable real estate (high traffic train stations) in choice locations. Fourth, as far as I know any new HSR train lines built since the privatization were publicly funded, since new JR company could afford to build them on a commercially viable basis otherwise. Fifth, train fares are still regulated, and JR East only recently increased fares for the first time in decades… Thus, rather than a simplistic public > private transformation, the whole exercise involved a rebalancing of assets, liabilities and risks between the public and private sector, but both remain important to the whole construct. In any case there was serious planning and government decisions around what was necessary to have at least three commercially-viable JR companies (East, West and Tokai) as a result. So probably more an example of a successfully executed privatization with continuing government involvement, rather than a “private enterprise good, government bad” story.

English
0
0
3
42
Chris 🦝 (READ BIO!!)
Chris 🦝 (READ BIO!!)@TrashPanda08x·
Amtrak Borealis projected annual ridership: 125k Actual ridership: 215k Amtrak Mardi Gras projected annual ridership: 52k Ridership 8 months into service: 100k Don't let people tell you we "Don't need trains, no one would ride them"
Chris 🦝 (READ BIO!!) tweet media
daviss 📸@daviss

Not enough trains too many riders: "Rail ridership locally is surging. In fiscal year 2025, just under 200,000 travelers got on or off Amtrak trains at St. Paul’s Union Depot. That marked a 58% increase over the previous fiscal year and was the highest ridership in the Twin Cities by far in the past 15 years." startribune.com/as-ridership-s…

English
51
1.2K
9.4K
207.4K
Fool Pitier
Fool Pitier@PitierOfFools·
@TrashPanda08x What advantage do advantage do either of these trains have over a bus, other than being more expensive, and, in the case of the Mardi Gras, slower?
English
1
0
0
513
WalkBikeNow retweetledi
urbanist slop hq
urbanist slop hq@SlopHq·
you don't hate public transit. you hate bad public transit.
English
4
49
213
3.6K
WalkBikeNow retweetledi
Randy Clarke
Randy Clarke@wmataGM·
As someone who does run a system I can definitely say that’s just not true. Transit is by far the safest and more efficient way to move people at scale & it’s why our team works so hard to continually improve so the community gets that value.
big_pedestrian@big_pedestrian

The core issue with transit in America is that the people who run it do not view it as the safest, most efficient and affordable way to move people at scale. They often view it as a jobs program, equipment purchase program or social services for those without other options.

English
21
30
683
35.1K
WalkBikeNow
WalkBikeNow@WalkBikeNow·
@rocketrepreneur @Simberg_Space @big_pedestrian Good lord, where do you get your information? The transit industry is full of talented professionals who are trying to run good systems. Yes, they do take a salary. That doesn’t make it a jobs program.
English
1
0
0
13
Jonathan A. Goff
Jonathan A. Goff@rocketrepreneur·
@Simberg_Space @big_pedestrian That's probably fair. Especially given that most of the leadership of such organizations probably started out during or near the time 2008 recession, when so many people were focused on jobs programs as economic stimulus. It's hard for people to abandon outdated mental models.
English
1
0
1
16
big_pedestrian
big_pedestrian@big_pedestrian·
The core issue with transit in America is that the people who run it do not view it as the safest, most efficient and affordable way to move people at scale. They often view it as a jobs program, equipment purchase program or social services for those without other options.
Gianmatteo Costanza@emissionite

Is public transit primarily meant to serve commuters by affordably moving them from A to B, or is it a jobs program? The answer to that explains everything that is going wrong in our discourse.

English
19
89
1.1K
74.7K
WalkBikeNow retweetledi
John Lindsey
John Lindsey@JPL606·
@big_pedestrian This is the fucking dumbest thing I have ever read. Transit safety is always at the forefront of top level decisions that are made. Delete yourself.
English
0
1
1
144
Mark N
Mark N@mviski·
@big_pedestrian We need politicians in this country who actually ride public transit, want it to be a useful and enjoyable experience, and who want to build tons of housing because more neighbors makes a place more fun and vibrant.
English
2
1
9
767
WalkBikeNow
WalkBikeNow@WalkBikeNow·
@mviski @big_pedestrian Totally agree. And people should know this is also what most transit professionals want to see too.
English
0
0
0
9
Let's go running, Brandon! 🇺🇸✝️
You're so close. Yes it's spoils program for Democrat political machines in coastal cities. Tammany hall isn't just history. The jobs program is why they don't care about safety, convenience, actually getting people to work and home on time. It's easy to imagine a world where it's safe and efficient but that will always be a fantasy so long as it's about rewarding political clients with spoils.
English
2
0
7
1K
WalkBikeNow retweetledi
John Surico
John Surico@JohnSurico·
We love a pothole blitz, @NYCMayor, but what about a BOLLARD blitz to fix all the delineators guarding bike lanes/racks, curb extensions, and more? Most were flattened or ripped out entirely by the plows. And don't forget: we can all do our part, too. nyc.streetsblog.org/2025/02/06/you…
English
1
8
41
4.8K