MT

7.4K posts

MT banner
MT

MT

@mt_1466

Forever long but forever skeptical

United States Katılım Eylül 2017
1.8K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
MT
MT@mt_1466·
@evabeylin yeah but he made a billion dollars (or whatever) on SOL when it was pretty centralized with closed source apps dependent on FTX. and NOW, after a billion dollars, sees the light.... doesn't warrant praise IMO x.com/mt_1466/status…
MT@mt_1466

@DrSoldmanGachs Thanks for sharing. I don't understand why there isn't more pushback against Kyle & Multicoin. They made practically ALL their money on a sweetheart deal with SOL which we now know was basically engineered by FTX/Alameda. They made one lucky bet that was boosted by fraud lol

English
0
0
1
62
MT
MT@mt_1466·
@jon_charb Any other pain points in your DD you wish someone would fix?
English
0
0
1
71
MT
MT@mt_1466·
@ryanberckmans It's insane that he's pivoted and tied his whole brand/schtick to "L1s look inferior to mature web2 companies based on web2 metrics." How is this new, thought-provoking, or titillating to anyone who has been in the space for more than ~1 year?!
English
0
0
2
81
⟠
@ryanberckmans·
I think there's a bit of a grieving process for people who used to see Santi as a respectable eth person, and now not only has he left ethereum (a while ago), but he dogmatically sticks to this rev maxi nonsense, unable to explain why this matters for eth but not BTC or gold. Today, a newer L2 announced they're getting closer to mainnet launch. It's run by the largest public company in the UAE and in partnership with their central bank. Is the most impactful thing about this L2 launch the amount of fees it might generate for the L1 over the short term? (rev maxis are typically obsessed with the short term, focusing on today's revenue, discounting not just the future but the hereafter) It should be obvious to everybody that fees aren't the high order term with a launch like the UAE L2. Nor with Robinhood L2. Or Alibaba subsidiary L2. Or Sony's L2 that launched a stablecoin today. Or BlackRock's BUIDL. What's exciting here and builds confidence in ETH as a SoV is that these kinds of launches demonstrate that Ethereum's L1+L2 model is winning writ large. They show Ethereum eating the economic world. Crypto tokens are confidence-based assets. What the market cares about is trying to predict which platforms and tokens are going to end up being systemically important and thus may likely accrue sustainably high levels of global attention and confidence. Today, that confidence is held mostly by gold, US dollars, and Bitcoin. That's today. What about tomorrow? Given the rising global ubiquity of onchain and L2s, with the eth L1 hub and ETH SoV as the irreplaceable parts at the heart of the vast majority of it, ETH will do extremely well in the years to come. Imagine thinking that the whole world can come onchain, mostly on eth and L2s, but that ETH won't end up doing at least as well as BTC has already done ($2.5T). This should be the base case for educated neutral crypto investors. ETH bulls believe in much bigger numbers and the flippening. In sum, the problem with Santi's view is that it totally ignores the accumulated evidence of reality as to how the market prices crypto assets, especially L1s. rev maximalism should not be taken seriously by serious investors. Eth's L1+L2 model is winning, and it's not even close. ETH is on track to hit trillions via onchain growing global ubiquity, with the lion's share on ethereum.
Santiago R Santos@santiagoroel

Amazon is a network and arguably one of the most successful networks ever built. Which is why comparisons are uncomfortable: when you line Ethereum up next to real, scaled networks like Amazon or Facebook, the valuation gap becomes impossible to ignore. Ethereum at a ~$380B valuation generates roughly ~$1B in annual revenue → 380x sales. When Amazon carried a similar valuation, it produced $136B in revenue and $2.4B in net income → 2.6x sales. That means ETH holders today are paying ~146x more per dollar of revenue than Amazon investors did. The claim that “Amazon is a company, Ethereum is a network” doesn’t resolve the discrepancy: Networks are priced on the economics they produce: revenue and cash flows. Amazon’s network effects were real, scaled, and monetizable. And the market valued them on fundamentals, not hypotheticals. TVL and “assets secured” are not revenue. Settlement volume is not revenue. TAM is not revenue. At some point, you have to put up numbers on the dashboard to support the big narrative talk

English
16
25
201
13.3K
rip.eth
rip.eth@ripeth·
Ethereum introduces Ethereum Interop Layer making Ethereum feel like one chain. → one click to swap across L2s → use funds from anywhere → no bridges, no network switching → same security & censorship resistance
rip.eth tweet media
English
239
276
1.9K
288.6K
Shinobi
Shinobi@brian_trollz·
Saylor is a spook. He just wants this entire project to be unscalable, completely captured, and 99% of people unable to interact with it except through a custodian that can freeze, seize, and completely control everyone's assets. Just like the current financial system.
English
120
22
366
36.1K
MT
MT@mt_1466·
I’ve never seen someone yell more consistently and passionately into a void than this guy. Kudos for persistence, I guess, but dear god, pick up pickleball or something
Justin Bons@Justin_Bons

Ethereum is a technological dead end: They have doubled down on the ZkEVM; favouring L2s instead of scaling ETH! While locking in slow block times (10sec!) as a consequence of this decision... This means ETH will never compete with fast & high throughput chains like SOL & SUI!

English
0
0
1
142
MT retweetledi
Aylo
Aylo@alpha_pls·
TLDR: don't touch Kanye's coin, you will lose your money. It's nothing new, or interesting, so I suggest as we all collectively ignore it so as not to give scammers even more of our already lacking liquidity.
Conor@jconorgrogan

By my estimation, at least 94% of the new Kanye token is insider owned -87% of the new Kanye token was owned by a single multisig (now dispersed to multiple wallets) -3%+ was bought in a single transaction, with size, by assorted (prepared) wallets at market open -7%+ in LP

English
35
9
121
11.7K
MT
MT@mt_1466·
@mdudas What ever happened to Louis, the 2017 British (?) ETH YouTuber that would take walks in the woods and discuss ETH?
English
0
0
2
196
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
Having their own L1 is such a strange choice. It’s EVM anyway? And it’s still a blockchain? What’s the point then?
English
16
3
126
6K
MT
MT@mt_1466·
I just don't get it... I know most won't care but.... If you build your "blockchain" based solely around $USD or stablecoins, it is built within centralization, regulatory fragility, and non-censorship resistance AT ITS CORE. It does not take a genius to see how the chain could be easily kneecapped. So why a "blockchain" at all??
Andy@andyyy

JUST IN: Stripe is officially building their own L1 blockchain alongside prominent crypto VC Paradigm named "Tempo" according to Fortune Crypto. It is a "high-performance, payments-focused blockchain" for the Fintech giants customer base.

English
2
1
3
489
MT
MT@mt_1466·
I haven't heard a great rebuttal to this Q I posted in a TG chat a while back... Why does everyone assume stablecoins won’t be subjected to the same cross-border remittance-type fees that traditional dollars currently are? There’s no NATURAL reason it costs 3-10% to send digital entries on a ledger across a made-up man-made country border. It is something political systems, bureaucracies, and old rails implemented themselves. The same can (and IMO will be) done once stablecoin payments get big enough. Most countries don't want the seamless flow of USD throughout their economy.
English
6
0
5
1.8K
Yano 🟪
Yano 🟪@JasonYanowitz·
Get in taxi. Driver is on the phone with Western Union clearly frustrated. They go back and forth for 20min. Brutal call. Finally it ends. Driver tells me this happens weekly. He sends $100 to Haiti every Friday but it rarely processes so he has to call. Western Union charges him $10 for that transaction. Then once a month he send $500 to Florida. For this, Western Union charges him $70 (!!) Insane! Highway robbery if you ask me. Cannot wait for stablecoins to crush Western Union. Don’t let anyone tell you that cross border payments isn’t an interesting use case.
English
91
24
565
51.9K
MT
MT@mt_1466·
@fejau_inc SBF? Dude could be free and top ~1000 (?) richest in the world if he didn't try and save Alameda more recently, Joe McCann?
English
0
0
1
223
MT
MT@mt_1466·
someone in the know, what was with this "anomalous" increase in data posted Celestia from ~Jan-May? And/or why is back to its pre-2025 ~baseline? @blockworksres @jadler0 @jon_charb @celestia
MT tweet media
English
0
0
0
102
MT
MT@mt_1466·
@dunleavy89 If only there were some sort of time-locked, if-then onchain technology 😂
English
0
0
0
68
Tom Dunleavy
Tom Dunleavy@dunleavy89·
Open this bet to other ETH disbelievers (20k+ followers or mutual connection or I have no confidence you would settle)
Tom Dunleavy@dunleavy89

ETH will hit $10k by the end of 2026 .@KyleSamani and I just booked a wager here Official Terms: ETH must hit $10k intraday on any major exchange (Binance, Coinbase, or similar) by 12/31/2026. 3-1 odds. This message will serve as the receipt, so we don't need to bother @cobie

English
2
0
25
3.5K
MT
MT@mt_1466·
@ryanconnor @blockworksres I got no bone to pick with Blockworks Research (big fan) but literally on the analysts podcast last week, you had guys openly "teasing" each other as one being the SOL maxi and the other HYPE. If they're cool saying it on the pod to the public, they probably have some bag bias
English
2
0
8
285
Ryan Connor | RockawayX 🇺🇸
Appreciate the post but the framing here re our analysts is incorrect. We are not “pro ethereum” or “pro solana” We are pro *alpha* There is no room for bias at @blockworksres
Steven Goldfeder@sgoldfed

On Blockworks: - I’ve gotten to know @JasonYanowitz quite well and in my conversations with him have always felt that (a) he has treated us fairly and (b) he is a fan of Ethereum and legitimately is looking for ways to go deeper (and these conversations were ongoing even in the height of Solana meme season). - There’s no denying that some of their analysts are biased and don’t like Ethereum, but my assumption was always that they allow their analysts to form their own opinions. - In fact @EntropyAdvisors was formed by two Blockworks researchers (@MattFiebach and @swmartin19) who became so bullish on Arbitrum while at Blockworks that they left to support the ecosystem full time. - No organization is perfect and I’ve had my frustrations. In full transparency, my speaker application to Permissionless was rejected, but I honestly doubt that Yano even knows this and don’t think this is reflective of an organizational bias. When we wanted to talk about the new Arbitrum DAO vision, Mike hosted A.J. on the podcast. And I was on Empire this week as well (to be released soon) as I have been many times over the years. - Additionally, the fierce blowback to AIP-1 when the Arbitrum DAO launched originated at Blockworks and caused us a ton of undeserved issues. But both then in the moment and up to today, I never attributed this to malice but to a misunderstanding. And in recent months I’ve shared a laugh with both Yano and the Entropy folks about how that whole debacle went down. - In sum, I’ve had a ton of positive interactions with Blockworks and I understand that their analysts will form their own opinions. Some will be pro-Solana and some pro-Ethereum. I think highly of Yano and Mike and have only had positive interactions with them consistently asking how they can do more to support the ecosystem.

English
28
6
93
15.2K
sam.frax
sam.frax@samkazemian·
37/ Next month @fraxfinance will be taking the first step in making $FXS the first type 2 asset to ever become a type 1 sovereign commodity & providing the blueprint for others if they so choose. Stay tuned for our Vision 2030 roadmap next month!
English
13
4
71
4.9K
sam.frax
sam.frax@samkazemian·
13/ $BTC is not PE DCF analyzed by anyone either, it is like gold but digital. PE DCF premium is not in the social Overton Window of real or digital commodities.
English
3
2
34
7.9K
sam.frax
sam.frax@samkazemian·
1/ Lot of talk about how to value different assets in crypto, especially given the recent AI/memecoin craze lately, but I want to explain the proper way to value the most important large crypto assets: L1 tokens vs 'type 2' aka dapp/L2/'equity' tokens. 🧵
English
16
64
338
77K
MT
MT@mt_1466·
Gutsy move. Think about the billions and billions "wasted" on ZK from acquisitions to research and chain(s) built. tough pill to swallow. But with the zkEVM only having ~$3 M (!) in DeFi, guess it's not that hard to throw in the towel and move to something with more traction
MT tweet media
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※)@sandeepnailwal

BIG update - As the largest holder of POL and someone who dedicated his life to development and success of @0xPolygon from the very beginning, I have decided to take full control of Polygon Foundation and will be its CEO going forward. Polygon Foundation owns and oversees multiple entities including one of the major contributors, Polygon Labs, which will continue to be led by Marc Boiron @0xMarcB as its CEO, who in my mind is the best executive/leader in the entire crypto industry. I’ve always stayed away from moving into the CEO role because I’ve been focused on building PF as an institutionally governed foundation. But right now, Polygon needs clear direction and focused execution and that means stepping up. With a healthy treasury and several hundred million in cash, we’re in a great position to keep building for the long term, without any distractions or pressure to raise. Today, I’m announcing a series of much-needed changes designed to deliver greater value to POL stakers and bring increased clarity to the broader market. 1. We will depreciate Polygon zkEVM next year. Polygon’s razor focus is going to be Polygon PoS and @Agglayer, nothing else. Polygon PoS will focus on Stablecoin payments and RWAs, while Agglayer will focus on building a trustless Internet of Blockchains. 2. The first milestone of the Polygon POS's Gigagas roadmap is now live in testnet. This first upgrade pushes network capacity beyond 1,000 transactions per second early July and it's only the beginning. We already have the plan to move to zero reorgs and <1 second finality with >5000 TPS achieved in a devnet enviornment. This will put Polygon PoS amongst the most performant blockchains by Sept-Oct timeframe. And beyond that, we have a clear path to scale to 100k+ TPS over next few years. These upgrades massively increase the economic viability of Polygon protocol and thereby the value for POL stakers. 3. Agglayer v0.3 has been in the making and I am announcing week of June 30th as the rollout date. This version of Agglayer is feature complete except fast interop which we anticipate to be completed by end of Q3. We are back to massive shipping mode. 4. The Agglayer Breakout program will continue to spin off projects resulting in increased focus for Polygon PoS and Agglayer and massive airdrops to POL stakers. We are in the business of building blockchain networks and ZK is an important tool to bring that internet level scalability to blockchains. We have contributed a lot to ZK and will continue to do so in a more neutral way by spinning out more of ZK research efforts. Next up is Polygon ZisK led by Jordi Baylina @jbaylina. More to come. 5. Now that the SEC has dropped its investigations and lawsuits related to MATIC as a security, which should have never existed given the nature of MATIC (and now POL), we are excited to see several large market makers coming back to the table in recent days to make markets in POL that strengthens the liquidity of POL on exchanges globally. 6. The Foundation will also engage in educational campaigns to ensure everyone is aware of the upgrade of MATIC to POL. 7. Bringing the Polygon brand front and center into what was previously the neutral Agglayer brand. It’s time to align the ecosystem more clearly and boldly under the Polygon identity. Also, going forward, major announcements from Polygon often will come from my twitter account, so follow me to be up to date and turn on your notifications. So why am I doing this? During 2021-22, we made a real effort to institutionalise the project by onboarding some amazing people as co-founders and board members and laying the foundation for scaling Polygon from the 10-100 stage of a venture. But little did I know, Ethereum itself was going to go into an existential crisis that would pull Polygon and the entire Ethereum ecosystem right back to the 1-to-10 stage … or by some measures, even 0-to-1. And the 0-to-1 stage is a different beast. It needs speed, courage to make bold bets, and the ability to handle failure. Also, the crypto industry has changed from being research centric to user centric and Polygon needs to change accordingly. Institutional setups and board structures are great for stability, but they tend to produce average-case decisions — not the sharp, aggressive moves needed to deliver exponential outcomes. Polygon is now back as a zero to one startup setup. With the support of an incredible team at Polygon Labs, and strong leadership including Marc @0xMarcB, Mudit Gupta @Mudit__Gupta (CTO), Ryan (COO) @web3RyanN and many others we are going to BRING IT. Let’s play!

English
0
2
3
188
MT
MT@mt_1466·
Thanks for always taking the time to reply. Fighting to keep/maintain the ability to run a node/validator at home guarantees "sufficient decentralization." Otherwise, you're left hoping your network doesn't consolidate/centralize down to 2,4,10 critical entities that can be pressured by nation states or new legislation. Sure, we can disagree on the extent to which you prioritize this in the million aspects it takes to create a successful blockchain. No, it isn't gonna juice common vanity metrics. But solo staking gives you certainty for an uncertain future.
English
0
0
0
8
Michael Nadeau | The DeFi Report
Sufficient decentralization means that developers cannot be deplatformed (as we saw early days with devs building on Twitter & Facebook APIs). We are solving this with public blockchains. It also means that users can interact directly with native assets and smart contracts without being censored. Those two things matter immensely.
English
1
0
1
66
Michael Nadeau | The DeFi Report
Ethereum deliberately optimized its roadmap to ensure "solo staking" — which represents just .5% of stakers on the network today. A huge mistake with the benefit of hindsight (considering that most users will interact with apps that can freeze assets and censor transactions). Meanwhile, @LidoFinance market share is dropping -- while Binance and Coinbase are rising. The forces of centralization are real and will continue to persist. It's just the way the world works. Prudent builders focused on UX & sufficient decentralization > ideological builders. ---- P.S. I'm sharing a market update with readers of @the_defi_report on Friday. If you'd like to have the latest research hit your inbox, you can sign up below 👇
Michael Nadeau | The DeFi Report tweet media
English
5
0
5
6.6K