Casey Chesshir

101 posts

Casey Chesshir

Casey Chesshir

@ChesshirCasey

Joined Temmuz 2025
7 Following2 Followers
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@stacycay @lolnochilly It starts at capitalism now. Capitalism was still a progressive force when much of the world still lived under feudal society. The French Revolution was a bourgeois revolution asserting their class interests over the king.
English
0
0
0
30
Stacy Cay
Stacy Cay@stacycay·
@lolnochilly Well yeah they’re adapting terms but it didn’t “start at anticapitalism” like op said. I think a rough framework that left tends to favor equality while the right favors elite rule would be a lot more useful
English
3
0
47
1.1K
Stacy Cay
Stacy Cay@stacycay·
Actually “left” and “right” in politics was invented in the French Revolution of 1789. It was to describe which side of the National Assembly you sat on. The left wanted democracy, the right wanted monarchy. Capitalism hadn’t been invented yet. Karl Marx wasn’t born either.
Johanna ☭ RCP/RCI@dialecticaldiva

For everyone that’s confused, the left of politics STARTS at anti-capitalism. Liberals are not leftists, the democrats are not leftists. Socialists and communists are leftists.

English
123
157
2.4K
64.7K
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@FUZxxl @maxliani No. The .at() function gives you the option to catch the exception if that’s how you want to handle it.
English
1
0
0
40
Max Liani
Max Liani@maxliani·
Actually, no. You can totally dereference a std::vector out of bound, write outside of the memory boundary, corrupt memory. You can remove from a container in a way that corrupts iterators. You can easily enter a bad state from exceptions. No, the std library doesn’t give safety
Dave W Plummer@davepl1968

If you use the STL, you can write safe code in C++ Everything is object, allocator, and algorithm-based, and that's it. You NEVER call malloc or free or use strxxx() functions. You never see, access, or operate on memory directly. It's different than regular C++, but less different than Rust.

English
18
4
203
23K
Robert Clausecker
Robert Clausecker@FUZxxl·
@maxliani They don't and it's kind of a tragedy that at(), not [] was chosen to be the bounds-checking one. Never seen any style guide mandating at() over [] either.
English
2
0
0
141
Veikko Immonen
Veikko Immonen@veimmone·
@ndr3www3 @paramitanoia As if you have to use any of the bullshit parts. You can use C++ as ”C with classes” all day long, the committee won’t hunt you down.
English
1
0
8
296
Brandon
Brandon@Brandon_Fuego·
@KozicaJ @joni_askola How exactly is Russia self-sufficient? Are you presuming if completely shut off they could function?
English
2
0
0
57
Joni Askola
Joni Askola@joni_askola·
People overcomplicate how to defeat Russia. The solution is incredibly simple: We just need to fund enough cruise missiles for Ukraine to systematically destroy every Russian oil refinery within reach. Cut off the fuel, and you end the war
Joni Askola tweet media
English
804
2.7K
15.6K
207.7K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
“Anthropic”
shirish@shiri_shh

Palantir AI + Claude was used to detect, prioritize, and strike over 1,000 targets in the first 24 hours of Operation against IRAN. The success was so ridiculous, so game-changing, that the Pentagon didn’t even wait. What used to be just a pilot project, just something they were testing out… suddenly became official, permanent, and everywhere. Palantir is now the core AI brain of the entire U.S. military. It’s getting rolled out across ALL branches.

English
3.2K
9.3K
91K
30.7M
Bidhan
Bidhan@bidhanxcode·
Google uses Go. Meta uses Go. Microsoft uses Go. Amazon uses Go. Uber uses Go. Dropbox uses Go. Cloudflare uses Go. Twitch uses Go. Docker uses Go. Kubernetes uses Go. PayPal uses Go. Shopify uses Go. What’s stopping you from learning Go?
English
1.1K
132
4.3K
635K
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@ChShersh It’s a Dancing Bear. It’s cute that it exists but the novelty wears off pretty quickly.
English
0
0
0
191
Dmitrii Kovanikov
Dmitrii Kovanikov@ChShersh·
Unironically, I don't know anyone who achieved anything meaningful with OpenClaw
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation

NVIDIA’s CEO says OpenClaw did in 3 weeks what Linux took 30 years to achieve "OpenClaw is probably the single most important software release ever. If you look at its adoption, Linux took some 30 years to reach this level. OpenClaw, in what is it, 3 weeks, has now surpassed Linux. It is now the single most downloaded open-source software in history, and it took just 3 weeks."

English
453
294
9K
584K
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@Uqimerioni @cmuratori It’s because of this graph that went viral recently. To call that “adoption” is of course absurd.
Casey Chesshir tweet media
English
0
0
0
35
Nodari 🇬🇪 🇺🇦
Nodari 🇬🇪 🇺🇦@Uqimerioni·
@cmuratori Yea, or maybe also npm downloads, these are just my guesses for his explanation of "adoption", I don’t know how exactly he measures that. Anyway it’s a very strange statement.
English
1
0
0
585
Casey Muratori
Casey Muratori@cmuratori·
What is the context for this quote? Linux installs number in the estimated billions. Is Jensen claiming that OpenClaw is somehow now installed on billions of machines? And if he is, where is he getting that statistic?
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation

NVIDIA’s CEO says OpenClaw did in 3 weeks what Linux took 30 years to achieve "OpenClaw is probably the single most important software release ever. If you look at its adoption, Linux took some 30 years to reach this level. OpenClaw, in what is it, 3 weeks, has now surpassed Linux. It is now the single most downloaded open-source software in history, and it took just 3 weeks."

English
59
18
758
56.4K
Mediazona
Mediazona@mediazona_en·
It’s the fourth anniversary of the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Our list of verified deaths has reached a grim milestone: 200,000 names. Read about it, as well as a new map of Russian losses we are introducing, here: en.zona.media/article/2026/0…
Mediazona tweet mediaMediazona tweet mediaMediazona tweet mediaMediazona tweet media
English
15
127
639
168.5K
ozzyreachdog
ozzyreachdog@ozzyreachdog·
@InterestingSTEM holy fuck thats disturbing. Hunt you own animals and eat them. These pigs are being fed slop all their lives then merked like this and you eat this shit. Get a hunting licence go hunt wild animals kill them in a natural way and feed yourself how nature intended
English
31
1
200
69.3K
Interesting STEM
Interesting STEM@InterestingSTEM·
This is how electrical stunning is performed in slaughterhouses. A controlled electric current is applied for a few seconds to cause immediate loss of consciousness before slaughter. The goal is that the animal does not perceive pain during the process.
English
1K
1.1K
11.1K
6.1M
Low Level
Low Level@LowLevelTweets·
“Twitter nerd drama situation is crazy”
English
10
2
225
14K
Booker Ngesa Omole ☭
Booker Ngesa Omole ☭@BookerBiro·
When encircled, a revolutionary state buys time, builds strength, prepares the blow. Joseph Stalin did not trust Adolf Hitler, he outmanoeuvred him. Strategy is not betrayal. It is survival. Only children confuse tactics with capitulation.
James Clayton@JamesClay1917

@wogillo @BookerBiro @northwoods_memo @CatManMarx Read some history! Stalin made a pact with Adolph Hitler. Don't you know this? Do they keep all of your cadre so ignorant? wsws.org/en/articles/20…

English
43
114
854
17.6K
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@theo I had the Mac desktop app unresponsive and sucking every cycle out of my cpu for like five minutes before I force quit it. It was trying to do a git push.
English
0
0
0
134
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
Claude Code has regressed an absurd amount in the last few days. Timestamps no longer update unless you un-focus/re-focus the tab. "thinking" doesn't show at all. I had a query run for 6 minutes with 0 output. This is genuinely unpleasant to use.
English
281
40
1.9K
523.4K
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@squatsons Doesn’t matter how big their fist was if they only had 6 demining vehicles.
English
0
0
0
31
ayden
ayden@squatsons·
Bakhmut followed by running head first into prepared defense lines. The cope about “force concentration” is true in one sense, but the alternative outcome is all of Russian firepower also being concentrated in one area. Either way the offensive had little to no chance of success outside of a complete Russian collapse.
Rob Lee@RALee85

From an interview with Valerii Zaluzhnyi regarding the 2023 offensive: “The original plan was to concentrate enough forces into a “single fist” to retake the partially occupied region of Zaporizhzhia — home to a vital nuclear power plant — and then have them advance south to the Sea of Azov. This would sever a corridor of land the Russian army had been using to resupply Crimea, which it illegally annexed in 2014. Success required a large, concentrated buildup and tactical surprise, Zaluzhnyi said. What happened instead, he said, was that forces were dispersed over a wide area, diluting their striking power. His account of how the counteroffensive diverged from the original plan was corroborated by two Western defense officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they aren’t authorized to speak publicly to the media.” @samya_kullab and Susie Blann apnews.com/article/ukrain…

English
23
31
339
45.6K
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@McFaul This is more like if the Confederacy had been annexed by Britain.
English
0
0
0
4
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
Imagine if the French had abandoned us during our War of Independence? Thats what we are doing now to Ukrainians as they fight for their independence. And they are not asking for our soldiers, only our ammunition.
English
685
3.9K
16.9K
217.9K
Edgar Sargsyan
Edgar Sargsyan@sargsyanedgar·
In war, the attacker almost always bleeds more. Advancing means exposure. Exposure means visibility. Visibility means death. The defender chooses terrain, digs in, studies your movement, and waits. The attacker stretches supply lines, reveals intent, and moves through uncertainty.
English
17
0
6
3.7K
Casey Chesshir
Casey Chesshir@ChesshirCasey·
@oitixion @nateberkopec That’s not what they said. They were talking about the assumption that more productivity will come if you spend more on tokens. Managers will hear “Boss, I use AI to increase my productivity, but I ran out of tokens”. Boss buys more tokens.
English
0
0
0
9
oitixion
oitixion@oitixion·
@nateberkopec Who are these people measuring their productivity by the amount of tokens they burn? That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
English
1
0
5
2K

Discover

@stacycay @lolnochilly @FUZxxl @maxliani @veimmone @ndr3www3 @paramitanoia @Brandon_Fuego