infinitedivine

1K posts

infinitedivine

infinitedivine

@infinite87401

Katılım Kasım 2025
23 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
infinitedivine
infinitedivine@infinite87401·
@sambbenson Just don't see dems winning this district. Median income is too high.
English
0
0
1
18
tphuang
tphuang@tphuang·
@teortaxesTex Yes my first thought too, looks like same supply chain used by others
English
2
0
14
696
Pete Bornschein
Pete Bornschein@Pbornsch·
@mattyglesias @R3snbleSciety Wow, U.S. Muslims are perhaps more socially liberal than I thought. 45% don’t think homosexuality should be discouraged. 52% don’t think social acceptance of trans people has been a change for the worse.
English
1
0
4
736
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
This is too meta for me. People should vote for El-Sayed if they want to. I don’t really agree with him on the issues and leftists are on average significantly worse electorally performers so my advice would be to vote for Stevens.
Shadi Hamid@shadihamid

With all due respect to @mattyglesias, the last few weeks have suggested to me that the center-left cares more about beating down the left than they do about beating Trump. We've seen the re-introduction of "woke" tropes by the Democratic establishment, weaponized against Abdul El-Sayed to suggest he's some kind of mysogonist, without any actual evidence. To accuse a Muslim man of misogyny is a classic trope, of course. If I was someone who cared about the future of the Democratic Party and it's ability to compete with the GOP, I'd be more enthusiastic about people like Abdul and Zohran, who model a positive "clean-living" masculinity. I'd be be enthusiastic about their ability to turn out young voters who are otherwise disaffected by a party that doesn't seem to want to listen to them. They're also practicing Muslims who respect the role of religion in public life, something we need more of in an overly secularized Democratic Party. This doesn't mean that everyone has to like Abdul or want him to win. Even if you want him to lose, you should see that he has something genuinely positive to offer to the Democratic Party. When the left wants to beat establishment candidates, it's called "factionalism." When the establishment wants to beat the left, it's not called that. It's just normal and unaccounted for. Take @neeratanden for example. Her feed is mostly about her disdain for the left. I don't see how this is constructive. And those of us who are not part of the Democratic establishment shouldn't concede too much ground on these points. I worry, though, that we have.

English
48
40
1K
115.8K
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
The whining about featuring Obama praising Stevens in an ad is funny to those of us who remember when AES was receiving flattering comparisons to Obama which he rejected out of hand on the grounds that Obama is bad.
Matthew Yglesias tweet media
English
39
163
1.4K
82.2K
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
I guess it’s not “offensive” but what is the plan to win electoral majorities once the Black moderates have been purged from the Democratic Party?
Matthew Yglesias tweet media
English
55
63
790
79.9K
G. F. O 🇺🇸🇳🇬
@perrymetzger @SwannMarcus89 I don't necessarily agree cos it led to conformity and jobs-for-the-boys type agreements. Would not allow insurgent movements like the Tea Party, MAGA, or even whatever the Dem left are doing now.
English
3
0
0
69
Swann Marcus
Swann Marcus@SwannMarcus89·
People are going to say Platner lost because of the rape allegation but that is not true He was always going to lose because people with jobs don't pay attention to elections until it's time for the general. Platner's polls went from D+8 to dead even within two weeks of his nomination and that was a month before the rape allegations dropped. He would have lost by 20 because support for him was in a tailspin the second normal humans started paying attention. He was literally out of money. His donations vanished after the primary. America's problem is that primary voters are pathetic fucking low-IQ incel freaks who have never seen the genitalia of the opposite sex in person and saddle those of us with jobs, friends, and families we care about with terrible extremist candidates year in and year out. We'd be better off if the party establishments told their bases to suck a dick and just picked the nominees for each party in a smoke-filled room
Swann Marcus@SwannMarcus89

The biggest lesson from the Graham Platner debacle is that both parties have been taken over by the biggest subhuman fucking losers to ever live because losers spend 80 hours a week online and have an infinite amount of time to spend on activism because they don't have friends or family and on the unlikely off-chance they have children they never see them because they aren't allowed within a thousand feet of a school or playground This country will not return to greatness until slopulist, unemployable losers stop being allowed to think their opinions matter and get shoved back into lockers where they belong

English
167
208
2.8K
301.8K
infinitedivine
infinitedivine@infinite87401·
@SER1897 @mattyglesias Obama was an establishment liberal. Would not be surprised if Bill himself would have voted for him over his wife in the primary. But the current crop of progressives are a myopic bunch with a thought window of 2 quarters.
English
0
0
0
6
Bilbo Watterson
Bilbo Watterson@bilbowatterson·
@mattyglesias Don’t try to rewrite history. In 2008 Democrats won because Republicans were widely perceived as having historically tanked the economy, and Obama ran on a progressive platform.
English
1
0
0
171
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
I think it's just going to take progressives deciding what their priority is, and that if the priority is taxes and welfare state expansion you need a bigger tent and more moderate positions on cultural issues. x.com/OsitaNwanevu/s…
English
20
11
303
53.8K
infinitedivine
infinitedivine@infinite87401·
@AlwaysFlacko Rabb knows how Fetterman was put into office. Fight Agency genuinely sucks at vetting. Hiring them is questionable and if they are going out of the way to preselect candidates then gg you have lost. None of successful progressives were recruited by progressives.
English
0
0
0
13
Forrest Miller 🎥🏆
Forrest Miller 🎥🏆@AlwaysFlacko·
I will say, people are giving AOC credit for not endorsing Platner and seeing the red flags more than Bernie, Warren, and Ro Khanna.. Chris Rabb also deserves credit for seeing those red flags.
English
2
2
21
618
infinitedivine
infinitedivine@infinite87401·
@Uncrewed @AnthonyMEmerson Troy Jackson was someone who could stop all the democrat vote splitting, not run a factional fight, run a smooth election but no populists always want a rabble rouser with a checkered past.
English
0
0
1
81
Econymous
Econymous@Econymous_1·
GIF
Econymous@Econymous_1

@christopherrufo There are still people who believe that Haitians were eating cats in Springfield based on a video you posted of Africans grilling Chicken in Dayton. Grifters have to come clean before the correction comes.

ZXX
1
0
10
151
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
The boring truth is that we know the names of the politicians who overperform with working class voters — it’s Josh Shapiro in PA, Roy Cooper & Josh Stein & Don Davis in NC, Vincente Gonzalez & Henry Cuellar in Texas, Gallego/Kelly/Hobbs in AZ, Whitmer/Slotkin in MI.
English
66
244
2.3K
139.1K
Stephen Robinson (Bluesky at @playtyperguy.com)
@ryangrim It also doesn't impress primary voters if you take them for granted. Stevens keep focusing on her supposed strength among GE swing voters while not making a single appeal to the primary voters who actively don't support her and who she'd need to win.
English
1
0
2
104
Ryan Grim
Ryan Grim@ryangrim·
A survey that was recently in the field, sponsored by a group supporting Mallory McMorrow, tested a two-way race between Abdul El-Sayed and Haley Stevens and found this, I'm told: Head-to-head: El-Sayed: 49% Stevens: 38 Undecided: 13 After positives El-Sayed: 56 Stevens: 39 After negatives El-Sayed: 54 Stevens: 39
English
44
184
1.6K
131.9K
infinitedivine
infinitedivine@infinite87401·
@SER1897 That's because the GOP has two opposite electorates in it's tent who is singularly opposed to progressives. Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line.
English
0
0
0
13
Stephen Robinson (Bluesky at @playtyperguy.com)
The point here is that despite the concern trolling from pundits/centrists about the DSA, "moderate" Republicans have been able to thrive and co-exist with an increasingly radical right-wing. They also never have to punch right. Lawler is not the Fetterman of his party.
English
1
1
2
87
Stephen Robinson (Bluesky at @playtyperguy.com)
The Tea Party/MAGA takeover of the GOP was ultimately enabled by Republicans remaining competitive in swing seats (specifically CA/NY). Marjorie Taylor Greene held a solid red seat, but Mike Lawler (and once upon a time Nancy Mace) helped deliver a GOP majority.
Dave Wasserman@Redistrict

New @CookPolitical: Far-left candidates are winning Dem primaries, but not in most of the races that will decide the House majority. Analysis by @ercovey: cookpolitical.com/analysis/natio…

English
1
1
1
277