laserpunk.eth

2.5K posts

laserpunk.eth banner
laserpunk.eth

laserpunk.eth

@laserpunkdoteth

dev. Defi degen, pendle maxi and nft enjoyoooorrrrrr

Katılım Ocak 2024
1.1K Takip Edilen519 Takipçiler
Etc.
Etc.@ec265·
You are mistaken ETH is a superior SoV to BTC Token inflation is not inherently a bad thing, and indeed it’s arguably the most important thing for a digital ssset in order to retain security and decentralisation Issuance cap > supply cap You are missing the demand side of the equation, as ETH has significantly more utility than BTC And Ethereum is multiple things at once… that’s the entire point
English
2
1
99
765
PhiMarHal
PhiMarHal@PhiMarHal·
@laserpunkdoteth @hanni_abu @MrCampbell For all the corposlopper acts mighty and proud, day and night he can't help but look over his shoulder... in fear of getting Hanniabued. An inevitability. When, is the only question.
English
2
0
2
17
Stephen | DeFi Dojo
Stephen | DeFi Dojo@phtevenstrong·
When was the last time Iran attacked American non-combatants on American soil? When was the last time Iran attacked American non-combatants directly anywhere? AFAIK, they haven't. And even if you use Hezbollah as a proxy, it would be 40 years since the last attack on U.S. non-combatants (Beirut). I don't support the Ayatollah (whose regime we are largely responsible for), but it is not clear to me that Iran was a threat to U.S. non-combatants.
English
21
1
81
5.4K
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
President Trump isn't interested in endless wars, he's interested in ENDING decades-long chaos in the Middle East.
The White House tweet media
English
16.8K
11.6K
51.9K
2.2M
Gwart
Gwart@GwartyGwart·
bitcoin mindfucks a lot of VCs because they rhetorically ask “what is the likelihood that the *very first* version of a new technology ends up being the most valuable or useful version of a new technology?” And ironically the answer for nearly 2 decades now is “very high”
English
74
29
541
46.3K
Euphoria
Euphoria@Euphoria_fi·
We said to tap around and find out. Turns out… some of you listened. Surprise! Anyone who registered within the first 12 hours of this announcement 👇 is now IN. If you checked then and weren’t eligible, check now. Less than 12 hours until the Tapathon begins 🏆
Euphoria@Euphoria_fi

Tapathon Eligibility Is Now Live! If you think you’re in, it's time to check. Competition kicks off on Monday, Feb 16th. There are 2 ways to access: 👇

English
227
46
317
25.7K
Jake
Jake@Jakeronthia_·
How to win a Rolex in a testnet competition: - Tap as more as you can - Be smart and wait for ‘market’ sessions - You have 1 week timeframe for this competition - You need a code to play @Euphoria_fi - It’s closed to 5000 testers so the odds are high One of the app which most likely gonna pump the MegaETH trenches and volume. Who wants to try it?
English
33
1
74
7.1K
laserpunk.eth
laserpunk.eth@laserpunkdoteth·
@Dellarium1 @grok is it allowed to touch the granit of the stone after release in curling?
English
4
0
2
66.2K
Dellarium
Dellarium@Dellarium1·
Canada cheating in Curling. What a idiots. These players should be banned.
English
418
718
14.8K
3.4M
Oliver Liu
Oliver Liu@fanpackers004·
@swedishnotposh Errr this isn’t a foul? Lmao you can touch it as many times as you want before the hog line
English
5
0
3
1.5K
vic
vic@swedishnotposh·
canada cheating in the curling game against sweden. simply disgraceful playing and behaviour. telling the swedish players to fuck off when there is proof. #olympics2026
English
34
28
217
44.7K
Christopher Ehrlich
Christopher Ehrlich@ccccjjjjeeee·
It actually worked! For the past couple of days I’ve been throwing 5.3-codex at the C codebase for SimCity (1989) to port it to TypeScript. Not reading any code, very little steering. Today I have SimCity running in the browser. I can’t believe this new world we live in.
Christopher Ehrlich tweet media
English
204
302
5.2K
804.5K
laserpunk.eth
laserpunk.eth@laserpunkdoteth·
@cobie @tomhschmidt I always wondered why he wears so much make up even though he is of the male gender, but now I understand
English
0
0
0
149
Cobie
Cobie@cobie·
@tomhschmidt Kyle was mid jestergooning when a group of HLoids came and spiked his Cortisol levels 😭 Is Ignoring the HLoids while munting and mogging .eths more useful then SMV chadfishing in the club? Hyperliquid
English
134
99
1.9K
116.2K
Tom Schmidt >|<
Tom Schmidt >|<@tomhschmidt·
“Kyle Samani” was a five-year long sociological study by Anthropic PBC. The study has now concluded. We thank you for your participation.
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani

@jon_charb Hyper liquid is in most respects everything wrong with crypto Founder literally fled his home country to build Openly facilitates crime and terror Closed source Permissioned

English
21
12
595
142K
laserpunk.eth
laserpunk.eth@laserpunkdoteth·
@based16z @dcfgod It's a good pitch but traditionally the perp crown has rotated every once in a while, I think that's why it's discounted.
English
0
0
0
58
DCF GOD
DCF GOD@dcfgod·
someone convince me not to buy
DCF GOD tweet mediaDCF GOD tweet media
English
38
3
182
46.4K
Fidelity Digital Assets
Fidelity Digital Assets@DigitalAssets·
We are excited to introduce Fidelity Digital Dollar (FIDD), a new stablecoin issued by Fidelity Digital Assets, NA and pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar. Learn more and get started with FIDD: go.fidelity.com/6qip11
Fidelity Digital Assets tweet media
English
136
325
1.7K
279K
laserpunk.eth
laserpunk.eth@laserpunkdoteth·
@KyleSamani @multicoin Your legacy is gonna be great. You were wrong about everything and you were an asshole about it 😅
English
0
0
0
41
Kyle Samani
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani·
0/ A personal update I have decided to step back from @multicoin. It's a bittersweet moment for me because my time at Multicoin has been some of the most meaningful and rewarding of my life. That said, I am excited to take some time off and explore new areas of technology. After nearly a decade in crypto, I’m more confident than ever that crypto is going to fundamentally rewire the circuitry of finance. I believe the Clarity Act will unlock a tidal wave of new entrants and spur adoption unlike anything we’ve seen. I remain bullish on crypto, specifically Solana, and intend to continue making personal investments in the space and supporting Multicoin portfolio companies. Moreover, I will continue to serve on the board of @zama, and I will continue in my role as Chairman at Forward Industries (@FWDind). More on Forward in next tweet. It goes without saying that I also remain bullish on Multicoin. My partners @tushar_jain, Brian Smith, @johnrobertreed, @mattshap1, @xethalis, @SpencerApplebau, and @shayonsengupta are some of the best investors and operators in the world. I am excited for them to continue to drive the crypto ecosystem and Multicoin forward for many years to come. To all of our portfolio founders, LPs, and industry partners—thank you for the opportunity to work with you. For reference, here is the letter we shared with LPs today drive.google.com/file/d/1bsoabi…
English
510
64
1.8K
1.2M
laserpunk.eth
laserpunk.eth@laserpunkdoteth·
@Auri_0x Vitalik literally mentions stylus in his post. You know what that is right?
English
0
0
1
113
Auri
Auri@Auri_0x·
What I learnt today Apparently it’s bullish for every L2 somehow according to founders My take Bullish for: MegaETH Starknet Aztec ZkSync (?) Bearish for: Arbitrum Optimism Irrelevant for: Base Rest of L2s are simply irrelevant to talk about
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

English
45
4
155
18.5K
0xAms
0xAms@0xAmSS·
how can Vitalik post such a thing without even coordinating with the head of EF ? How can you still in 2026 not have any single coordination in terms of comm (sorry i have much respect for you, but i don't see any organization around 300 billion market cap that does not have a minimum communication strategy)
English
1
0
5
713
Tomasz K. Stańczak
Tomasz K. Stańczak@tkstanczak·
imho / my interpretation (not reviewed by Vitalik or others) 1) successful Ethereum L2s already have unique value propositions 2) Vitalik talks about the 'very long time ago' idea of rollups acting like shards - simple replicas of L1 EVM and tooling without the burden of L1 scale consensus 3) Vitalik acknowledges here the success of L2s like Starknet, ZkSync, Base, Arbitrum, Lighter, etc. where they provide unique features or tradeoffs 4) Vitalik notices that the idea of a vanilla rollup that is not Stage 2 (l2beat.com) and claims scaling Ethereum is suboptimal and will be most likely replaced by the native rollups tech 5) Vitalik points at L1 scaling plus native rollups as the 'no tradeoffs' blockspace that is now scaling 6) Ethereum still needs rollups to scale but it is important to differentiate the pure Stage 2 scaling (inheriting all Ethereum security properties / low risk) vs scaling with security tradeoffs (like MegaETH) - the latter still has a tremendous value for risk-aware users
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

English
28
47
429
50.5K
materkel.eth 🦇🔊
materkel.eth 🦇🔊@materkel·
That's why it was so important to commit to it in the first place. Things we wouldn't have now if we didn't support the rollup centric roadmap: - institutions building on Ethereum - ZKVMs ready for L1 hyperscaling so overall I'd say this was all worth it. The ETH price probably would have done better at some point, but it would also be worse off longterm. I don't think Ethereum would be nearly in as good of a position as we are right now if we didn't lean into L2s.
English
2
0
36
1.1K
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄
ok, now ya'll going swing too far to the other side and say L2s suck and were pointless. also wrong. L2s are awesome. L2s are good for Ethereum. It's a massive win for Ethereum to be home to the L2s.
English
71
15
350
16.5K