Michaela Jester, Esq.

1K posts

Michaela Jester, Esq. banner
Michaela Jester, Esq.

Michaela Jester, Esq.

@JesterEsq

San Diego, CA เข้าร่วม Şubat 2026
107 กำลังติดตาม137 ผู้ติดตาม
Jody Chase
Jody Chase@JodyChaseTN·
⚡Me Tomorrow whenever my "Candace Owens will be Live in 30 minutes" notification comes through 😂
English
20
16
301
3.1K
🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸@LionelMedia·
Where is Erica Kirk? When did she last speak, address anyone, or read from a script? The public persona has vanished. What happened to the woman who once had style? #EricaKirk #MissingPerson
English
14
15
126
5.6K
Michaela Jester, Esq.
Michaela Jester, Esq.@JesterEsq·
@JodyChaseTN Probably an exit. I tried to watch the CK show twice last week, and it's a terrible platform to have live shows on - not to mention, 50% or more is just old clips of CK and sponsors.
English
0
0
1
19
Jody Chase
Jody Chase@JodyChaseTN·
⚡🚨 QUESTION OF THE DAY 🚨⚡ Why is Andrew Kolvet using Charlie Kirk’s podcast platform to build up his own YouTube channel? Is he preparing for an eventual exit, expanding his personal brand, or simply trying to keep Charlie’s audience engaged through multiple platforms? What do you think the strategy is here? 👀
Jody Chase tweet mediaJody Chase tweet media
English
8
7
84
5.2K
Honest Ash
Honest Ash@realhonestash·
We now know he wasn’t excited, he was texting people that they were going to kill him. And we know she was awake when he was and didn’t tell him goodbye. Horrific!
English
9
8
122
11.1K
Honest Ash
Honest Ash@realhonestash·
Erika was awake when Charlie came into the room and got his ring and his necklace 😳🤯 She lay there and pretended to be asleep, didn’t say a word to him, and he left. I didn’t think I could hate her more, and I hate her more. @baroncoleman
English
153
326
3.1K
340.7K
Michaela Jester, Esq.
Michaela Jester, Esq.@JesterEsq·
@patriceismagic @BlakeSNeff Yes ma'am. It says everything - they either don't have it or they are intentionally causing unnecessary drama. I'm all in on the first option bc they wouldn't be able to resist getting a perceived one-up on Candace. They are wasting their time on rhetoric nobody is reading.
English
0
0
0
6
Blake Neff
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff·
Points 1 and 2 are the most important ones here. Everything about this “saga” is because the same people just tell ridiculous lies, over and over, and then invent new ones as soon as their previous lies get clowned on. They do it over and over because they are not motivated by the truth, but by malice and the desire to destroy.
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet

I haven’t chimed in on the whole video saga yet because I find the entire thing absurd. But since this community note is 100% factually wrong and is now impacting how Grok answers legitimate questions, it needs to be corrected. 1. This entire debate only exists because a handful of bad-faith actors have spent months trying to attack Erika, destroy the organization her husband built, and divide the movement. Most, if not all, of these people attacked Charlie when he was alive, and they found a new target since Charlie is now off-limits. You can rebut lies with all the facts you want, but they don't care, and they won't stop. Next, it's a chin mole is missing, next it's AI, etc. etc. 2. There is a pattern continually playing out and people need to see it for what it is. They launch a conspiracy theory, they say it's the smoking gun, it falls apart, a new theory appears, and the cycle repeats. Meanwhile, the people making these claims have no obligation whatsoever to prove them. They and their followers condemn the accused as guilty and demand a response to clear their name. The accused is then expected to respond, defend themselves, produce documents, provide explanations, and somehow prove a negative. But the response is never sufficient because the response was never the objective. Goalposts move instantly. The answer was too defensive, too dismissive, or they find some irrelevant tidbit to pick apart and the cycle repeats. It's a sucker's game. 3. I find the video largely irrelevant. Boards do not determine succession based on whether someone can produce a random clip. Boards evaluate leadership, governance, organizational continuity, and the wishes of the founder. In this case, Charlie hand-picked the board, communicated his wishes to them, to me personally on three or four occasions, to Erika, to Don Jr. (who has gone on the record), to pastors, friends, and colleagues. That board voted unanimously to make Erika CEO. That should be the end of story. 4. Yes, Charlie was asked about this once when a camera was on him and he said exactly what he always did: Erika would take over should something God-forbid happen and that she would do a great job. 5. This did not happen at ActCon 2023 in West Palm as @CommunityNotes wrongly says. He said this in Aspen in 2025 at Investors. ActCon was a large convention with a massive blue stage and thousands of attendees. Investors was a small hotel ballroom with a few hundred attendees and a white and red backdrop. I was at both. 6. The "Building the Machine" claim is also wrong. In 2023, the theme of ActCon was "We are doing the work to save America." When we titled CK's opening speech for a podcast episode, we just came up with a random title "Building the Machine" that Charlie liked. Charlie was from Chicago and always talked about the Democrat Machine. He wanted a machine built for the right. It was just an episode title but over time it became something Charlie said more and more. So, in 2025, after Trump won the election, Charlie wanted to expand the Chase the Vote "machine" that proved so effective, so he made the theme for Investors 2025 "Building the Machine." 7. I think Community Notes has been a force for good and I fully support its purpose and mission, but for whatever reason, it’s been weaponized in this case to spread disinformation. Hopefully whatever went wrong here will be corrected both on this note, and in the future. Images of the two very different events attached. Blue backdrop is ActCon 2023, while the white and red is Investors 2025. cc: @nikitabier

English
321
98
881
84.8K
Michaela Jester, Esq.
Michaela Jester, Esq.@JesterEsq·
You guys don't have this raw, unedited clip from August in Aspen. That's the answer. You'd jump at discrediting @RealCandaceO if it did exist. Oh hey, also where are Charlie's remains? Did y'all burn him like a piece of evidence? Just wondering what his final will & testament said about that...
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff

Points 1 and 2 are the most important ones here. Everything about this “saga” is because the same people just tell ridiculous lies, over and over, and then invent new ones as soon as their previous lies get clowned on. They do it over and over because they are not motivated by the truth, but by malice and the desire to destroy.

English
0
0
0
55
Jody Chase
Jody Chase@JodyChaseTN·
⚡🚨 TRENDING 🚨⚡ Alex Clark just asked Candace Owens "How did Putin Taste" I thought TPUSA Was a Christian organization? 🤔
Jody Chase tweet media
English
106
102
1.1K
13.7K
Michaela Jester, Esq.
Michaela Jester, Esq.@JesterEsq·
Totally! Look, I know he's a murderous dictator, too. Not lost on me, but here's what I like about him: 1) he's kind and cordial to all foreign dignitaries...ive seen US ambassadors walk straight past him leaving him holding out his hand - so rude. 2) he loves animals , idk, you can't fake that 3) provider 4) protector - nobody woule ever mess with you 5) looks good in a suit. We lack a lot of this in the dating pool full of @BlakeSNeff
English
1
0
2
8
Michaela Jester, Esq.
Michaela Jester, Esq.@JesterEsq·
@ImGinnyRobinson It's literally the best rumor they can cone up with and it's disgusting. Not to make this about women, but I find it interesting given the leadership conference they just had, & are now putting down a woman with something that is so distasteful and blatantly false.
English
0
0
9
201
Ginny Robinson
Ginny Robinson@ImGinnyRobinson·
It is tremendously odd that TPUSA is running around claiming Candace Owens and Vladimir Putin had sex.
English
37
24
392
4.9K
Michaela Jester, Esq.
Michaela Jester, Esq.@JesterEsq·
Because he is a disingenuous person. I know it's difficult to understand for you and I (and others) and that's because we lack the capacity to betray others (many times to our own detriment), and I'll admit no matter how many times I come across someone like this, it is still shocking. Best to think about as a literal biological neurological impairment - sociopaths/psychopaths do not have the same areas of their brains light up. These people get by for a long time because they can come in any color, shape, gender, form, etc.. - and nobody ACTUALLY wants to believe someone is so crappy. They get high on validation, power, fame, money (you name it), and anyone who threatens it feels the wrath. Normally, we don't see these covert narcissists for who they are - it is the mist dangerous behind closed doors because the victim is isolated, made to sound crazy, & rage baited. In my opinion, this is exactly what he is based on what we learned about the girl online... I can tell you @TuckerCarlson is a good dude, was close to Blake, & probably HATED to see him lose his job believing he was just a young kid who made a mistake - you can say certain things privately & your people understand - some things should never be said in written form. If Tucker hadn't believed in Blake, he wouldn't have said yes to CK. This is just one of those times where we all say "dang, I really got that wrong." Luckily, these people bring on their own demise. They can't keep up the facade.
English
0
0
0
26
SassySapph
SassySapph@Jojo3398791714·
@JesterEsq @buckleycarlson @BlakeSNeff @JohnMappin @TuckerCarlson Biting the hand that fed him... Literally. Because without Tuckers praises of him and without Charlie trusting Tuckers words, he'd be an unemployable bum who'd probably end up in prison for the same behavior that got him fired. Creepy. Makes me wonder why he's behaving like that
English
1
0
3
24
SharrellAnne
SharrellAnne@SharrellAnne2·
As a widow myself, I almost didn’t share this because I didn’t want it to come across as self-serving. But Dana is saying everything that needs to be said here. As Christians, we’re called to care for widows, include widows, protect widows, and treat them with compassion. These aren’t suggestions. They’re things we’re taught to live by. ❤️
English
89
159
1K
52K
Arynne Wexler
Arynne Wexler@ArynneWexler·
“You can’t say retarded, that’s offensive” you literally abort them
English
45
116
2.3K
47.1K