James Beauregard

Mujer ucraniana (Smishiinka) que siempre se ha mostrado como contraria a Putin y a la invasión rusa, sin embargo acaba de publicar un vídeo en Instagram donde explica con detalle cómo el Gobierno judío ucraniano, financiado por los gobiernos judíos de la Unión Europea, está llevando a cabo una clara política de sustitución poblacional: Mientras envían a la fuerza a todos los hombres ucranianos a morir al frente, por otro lado, importan miles de inmigrantes a los que ofrecen casas gratis y salarios más altos en los mismos puestos de trabajo que a los propios ucranianos.

Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans. Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable. Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale. Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné. Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut. À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol. Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée. Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit. Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie. Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle. Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère. Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision : "La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne) "La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek "Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.

@Alinavisooo @ferreterobat YES

DO YOU SUPPORT TENNESSEE, ALABAMA, KANSAS, NORTH CAROLINA, AND ALL OTHER STATES OFFICIALLY BANNING SHARIA LAW? BE HONEST: A. YES, immediately! B. NO, not necessary! C. Maybe... D. Not Need

How could the world have been so misled? And so many still choose their ignorance.

Nothing infuriates an uninformed Congressional Dem more than when they realize they voluntarily triggered a debate with someone who actually knows what they are talking about, reads federal statute and adheres to Supreme Court precedent. Today’s self-implosion by @rosadelauro was quite remarkable to witness. Without apology or regret, I will always adhere to the best available reading of federal statute pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright.

@PeriklesGREAT DEPORT THEM ALL.

Any refugee group with no women & children should automatically be rejected for asylum ? a. Hell Yes b. No c. No more Globalist replacement of citizens Invasion boat with NO elderly, women, & children—not even one. It’s all military age men, who attack & intimidate locals.

Medieval Europe is the foundation western civilization was built on. The convergence of warrior culture, with Christianity, honor, chivalry, & law, yet how much of it is taught to our kids in school? Yeah, instead our kids are told we have no culture. Why do you think that is?

@ggreenwald The UK? Because the British Monarchy was never just a figurehead. open.substack.com/pub/greenwald/…

Elon Musk just used a joke to perform an autopsy on the American economy. Two economists go for a hike. They find a pile of shit. One pays the other $100 to eat it. They keep walking. Find another pile. The second economist pays $100 back to eat that one. They stop. Neither man gained a dollar. Both ate shit for nothing. But on paper they just generated $200 in GDP. Musk: “That basically would count as a job. This is to illustrate the absurdity of economics.” That is not a punchline. That is the operating system of the federal government. Every time a politician celebrates “record job creation” this is what they are describing. Not output. Not value. Not progress. Motion. The entire bureaucratic machine exists to manufacture friction and then invoice for it. Compliance layers built to justify the next compliance layer. Oversight committees that produce nothing but the need for more oversight. Consulting firms hired to audit the work of other consulting firms. Trillions circulating through systems that have never produced a single thing you can hold in your hands. But the GDP number ticks up. So everyone applauds. The shit gets eaten. The scoreboard moves. Nobody asks what actually got built. This is why Washington treats AI like a five alarm fire. AI does not play the friction game. It does not form a committee. It does not schedule a review. It does not file 400 pages of paperwork no one will ever read. It just solves the problem. And that is the one thing the machine cannot survive. The government does not tax results. It taxes the process. The longer the process, the deeper the cut. AI compresses a ten day workflow into seconds. There is nothing left to bill. Nothing left to tax. Nothing left to skim. So they will spend the next decade warning you that AI threatens the economy. What they will never say is what it actually threatens. The illusion that activity equals progress. The $200 economy where both men ate shit and called it a job. The machines are not coming for your purpose. They are coming to prove that half the economy never had one.

@mcafeenew @UnmaskTheSys DEPORT MAMCOMMIE! @ZohranKMamdani @DAGToddBlanche @FBI @NewYorkFBI @POTUS @VP @TheJusticeDept @DHSgov @ICEgov @SecRubio @StateDept

🚨NYC SOCIALIST GRIFTER ZOHRAN MAMDANI’S FAMILY JUST GOT CAUGHT IN A MASSIVE “FREE GROCERY STORE” SCAM RAKING IN MILLIONS WHILE PRETENDING TO HELP THE POOR! Follow @UnmaskTheSys His brother Eli Mohammed Mamdani buys condemned, falling-apart buildings from the city for literal pennies on the dollar… then immediately flips them right back to the city at full market value for the “free grocery” program. Then they hire their cousin Rufus Theodore Mamdani’s construction company to “fix them up” — pocketing as much as $5 MILLION PER STORE for the entire Mamdani crime family. That’s how communism works, folks — the elites preach “equity” while their own bloodline gets filthy rich off taxpayer-funded scams. The watchdog group just blew the whole rotten operation wide open. Share this everywhere before they try to bury it! Follow @mcafeenew for more drops.

Cathie Wood just named the contradiction nobody wants to touch. She compared Elon Musk to Thomas Edison. Not as praise. As a pattern. Wood: “I think he’s the Thomas Edison of our age… he wants to do the right thing to transform the lot of most of humanity.” The media sees a reckless billionaire setting fires. Wood sees the only person in the room building anything at all. The gap between those two readings tells you everything about who controls the narrative. Start with Tesla. Wood: “Tesla was an environmental move, which I think a lot of people attacking his cars… they’ve forgotten.” He built the exact machine environmentalists spent thirty years begging for. Didn’t lobby for it. Didn’t write a whitepaper. Built it. Forced every major automaker on Earth to abandon the combustion engine. Then the second he won, the same movement made him the enemy. Because the establishment never wanted the problem solved. They wanted the problem funded. And those are two very different things. A solved problem kills the committee. Kills the nonprofit. Kills the careers built on managing the crisis instead of ending it. Musk ended it. And they have never forgiven him. SpaceX looks like an escape hatch if you never read past the headline. Which is exactly what the press counts on. Wood: “What we learn about material science and technologies… is going to help us here on Earth as well.” Mars was never the exit. It is the lab. Build under conditions so brutal that every breakthrough changes what is possible back home. You learn to keep a human alive in a frozen irradiated vacuum. Fixing an energy grid on a temperate planet becomes arithmetic. He is not running from the cradle. He is stress-testing the technology that preserves it. But that story doesn’t sell ads. Doesn’t move polling numbers. So they bury it under hit pieces and congressional theater and call it journalism. Most people who reach his level stop building and start protecting what they have. They buy senators. They buy newspapers. They buy silence. Musk keeps picking the hardest unsolved problems on the planet and running straight at them. That is what terrifies the establishment. Not that he might fail. That he might succeed without them. Without their funding. Without their approval. Without anything they can hold over his head. A man they cannot buy is a man they cannot control. So they do the only thing they have left. They send the media after him. Every legacy outlet runs the same playbook. Strip the context. Clip the quote. Frame the motive. Let the algorithm do the rest. It has worked on every builder before him. It will not work on this one. They will spend their careers trying to tear him down. He will spend his building the thing that saves them anyway. The stones always come from inside the walls.

Why did the Czar allow the Bolshevik Revolution? Watch this painfully urgent 3-minute clip from July 2024.

V Rusiji je bilo ubitih 300.000 ljudi. Med njimi ni niti enega žida, med vodstvom pa jih je 90 %. Na vzhodu je 30 milijonov ljudi umrlo v mukah – pod streli, v klavnicah in zaradi lakote. Gre za požrešnega volkodlaka, ki uničuje narode. Laži in prevare židovskega boljševizma

R U listening? @RamTrucks @Dodge @StellantisNA @Chrysler @Jeep @fiat @AlfaRomeoUSA facebook.com/share/v/1BGPoU…

😂🤣 Qui a fait ça !

Revisiting what led up to WW2-tens of thousands of ethnic Germans were being killed as a result of the territorial concessions made after the Treaty of Versailles. What would you have done?

@TheRealMarina0 Yes. @SenJohnKennedy @SenateGOP @SenMikeLee @RandPaul @POTUS @VP

🚨BREAKING: Sen. Kennedy’s bill just moved forward, and it hits Congress where it hurts: NO paycheck for senators during a shutdown. If they can’t keep the government open, why should taxpayers keep paying them? Do you firmly support this? A. Huge Yes B. No