Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ—

23.8K posts

Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— banner
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ—

Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ—

@NigelTozer

Winding down here, still look occasionally. Find me here more: @thesimplifier.bsky.social

Worcestershire UK ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Nisan 2014
2.8K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰3.1K ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Syed Ijlal Hussain
Syed Ijlal Hussain@sijlalhussainยท
๐Ÿ” AI governance is becoming the real enterprise battleground, not AI models. As AI moves from copilots to autonomous actors, the hard problem is no longer intelligence. It is control, accountability, and trust at scale. What keeps breaking in practice: 1๏ธโƒฃ Strategic shift: AI governance is no longer a compliance layer. It is now part of system architecture. Without it, autonomy amplifies risk, not value. 2๏ธโƒฃ Leadership reality: Many enterprises still treat governance as policy and paperwork. Agentic systems require governance that is executable, observable, and enforced in production. 3๏ธโƒฃ Execution risk: Without clear ownership, auditability, and escalation paths, AI systems become impossible to trust once they start acting across workflows. The uncomfortable question leaders now face: Is your AI governed like a real operating system, or like a slide deck? ๐Ÿ“Ž via The New Stack: AI Governance Is the Next IT Battleground thenewstack.io/ai-governance-โ€ฆ @gaillparr @liontarakos @bbailey39 @BulbiT3ch @corixpartners @Transform_Sec @Corix_JC @ILoveBooks786 @COSTESLionelEr @ramonvidall @RLDI_Lamy @FrRonconi @timo_vi @Nicochan33 @NathaliaLeHen @sulefati7 @bulbi59 @arigatou163 @JohnLeh @Alovesublime @roads2rome @ALouiseLavalett @JoelleGirton @Grzebalski86888 @jornalistavitor @ExperimentWorld @SENDEROPRESS @VR_ARTech @coastal_scribe @Tech2Specialist @TCyberCast @WPricer @barristerlawusa @0xf2258f @Pulse1Pilot @O_Berard @quepasachico @codewithimanshu @NigelTozer @Ahmed43101178 @pierrecappelli @SitConsultores @PVynckier @mvollmer1 @AI_PlanetX @DrFerdowsi @VibeEdgeAI @Fabriziobustama @BridgeworksLtd
Syed Ijlal Hussain tweet media
English
11
30
43
1.5K
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Dr. Marcell Vollmer #StaySafe #CES2026
Autonomous delivery meets icy roads and suddenly the future looks veryโ€ฆ human On slides, simulations, and sunny demo days, autonomy looks flawless. But throw in ice, unpredictability, and real-world messiness โ€” and things get interesting fast. Itโ€™s not a failure. Itโ€™s a reminder. Autonomous systems are incredible at known environments. Ice, however, is the perfect stress test: low friction, high uncertainty, zero forgiveness. What this shows: - Autonomy isnโ€™t just a software problem. Itโ€™s a physics problem - Edge cases arenโ€™t rare in the real world, theyโ€™re the norm - Human judgment still matters most when conditions degrade Progress doesnโ€™t mean pretending limitations donโ€™t exist. It means designing systems that know when not to be confident. So yes, autonomous delivery will get there. But winter is doing us a favor by asking the hard questions early. The real benchmark isnโ€™t โ€œCan it drive?โ€ Itโ€™s โ€œDoes it know when it shouldnโ€™t?โ€ Video Credit @MyLordBebo @IanLJones98 @NevilleGaunt @bamitav @altiamkabir @sijlalhussain @marcusborba @jblefevre60 @Nicochan33 @TerenceLeungSF @KirkDBorne @CurieuxExplorer @enilev @Eli_Krumova @pascal_bornet @anand_narang @sulefati7 @Xbond49 @Hana_ElSayyed @engmlubbad @Timothy_Hughes @mcanducci @RLDI_Lamy @segundoatdell @engmlubbad @rvp @ipfcoline1 @PatGrant7777 @NigelTozer @Ronald_vanLoon @pierrepinna @Khulood_Almani @BetaMoroney @AkwyZ
English
1
6
12
417
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Nigel T ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽ— ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ