Ben Napier

207 posts

Ben Napier banner
Ben Napier

Ben Napier

@BenNapier

Government Affairs Partner @a16z | Prev Floor Director for @SteveScalise, @RulesReps, @OHRGOPCaucus

Washington, DC Katılım Ekim 2009
295 Takip Edilen635 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ben Napier
Ben Napier@BenNapier·
The FY26 NDAA delivers substantial progress on defense acquisition reform—clearing barriers for innovators to build the capabilities we need to win. But more work is left to do. Full breakdown: a16z.news/p/defense-acqu… @a16z @davidu @KTmBoyle
English
1
2
5
808
Ben Napier retweetledi
Matt Perault
Matt Perault@MattPerault·
Great to see the White House’s federal AI framework take a clear stand on several principles that work well for Little Tech. Creating a thriving national AI market requires both strong protections and room for innovation. We should regulate harmful uses of AI without unnecessarily burdening innovation. States should continue to police harmful conduct within their borders, but not create a patchwork of regulations on AI development that makes it difficult to build and compete. We should protect kids, while respecting speech and privacy rights. We should support workers through transition and strengthen the talent pipeline, without slowing AI adoption. We should recognize that AI training on copyrighted work is consistent with copyright law, but not take action ahead of the courts. We must meet the energy needs of an AI economy without saddling consumers or small businesses with the costs. This framework offers Congress a strong starting point.
Collin McCune@Collin_McCune

Thank you @POTUS, @DavidSacks47, @mkratsios47, and the full WH team for your leadership in pushing a national AI framework forward. Like other major industries in the United States, AI needs strong oversight from the federal government to protect the American public and to provide clear rules for our innovators. Today is a big step. Now Congress needs to come together and act!  We’re proud to support Little Tech in finding the right legislative solutions so the U.S. can continue to lead in AI.

English
3
2
9
800
Ben Napier
Ben Napier@BenNapier·
Great to see House GOP leadership unified behind a national AI framework that protects Americans and gives innovators clear rules. Now is the time for Congressional action!
Speaker Mike Johnson@SpeakerJohnson

My joint statement with Leader @SteveScalise, @HouseCommerce Chairman @RepGuthrie, @JudiciaryGOP Chairman @Jim_Jordan, and @housescience Chairman @RepBrianBabin on committing to act on the artificial intelligence (AI) framework released today by the Trump Administration: AI has begun to demonstrate its potential to improve Americans’ lives. To ensure we continue to harness its potential and beat China in the global AI race, Congress must take action. Today, the Trump Administration took a critical step in releasing a framework that gives Congress a roadmap to pursue legislation that provides innovators with much-needed certainty, while protecting consumers and prioritizing kids’ online safety. @HouseGOP looks forward to working across the aisle to enact a national framework that unleashes the full potential of AI, cements the U.S. as the global leader, and provides important protections for American families.

English
0
0
5
164
Ben Napier retweetledi
Collin McCune
Collin McCune@Collin_McCune·
Thank you @POTUS, @DavidSacks47, @mkratsios47, and the full WH team for your leadership in pushing a national AI framework forward. Like other major industries in the United States, AI needs strong oversight from the federal government to protect the American public and to provide clear rules for our innovators. Today is a big step. Now Congress needs to come together and act!  We’re proud to support Little Tech in finding the right legislative solutions so the U.S. can continue to lead in AI.
English
12
14
123
38.9K
Ben Napier retweetledi
American Innovators Network
American Innovators Network@Innovators·
AIN represents little tech, where AI innovation starts. We appreciate the push for a national AI framework because Startups can’t navigate a patchwork of 50 different state regulations just to be able to write a line of code. There’s an important opportunity here to get this right, and we look forward to engaging with Congress and @realDonaldTrump to ensure startups can build, compete, and grow. We support regulation that enables innovation, not one that slows it.
White House OSTP 47@WHOSTP47

x.com/i/article/2034…

English
0
5
9
1.3K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Jason Rosenthal
Jason Rosenthal@jasonrosenthal·
Congratulations to @EvanWeb3, @EmanAbio, and the entire @Mysten_Labs team on the launch of Hashi. An incredible list of day 1 partners - the future is bright.
Jason Rosenthal tweet media
English
1
6
37
4.8K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Collin McCune
Collin McCune@Collin_McCune·
Legislating is like big wave surfing. You spend years building a team, practicing, and making sure you have the right equipment, waiting for the weather and the swells to be just right. Then when the wave arrives, you don’t miss your opportunity. Sometimes it only comes once in a generation. We’re in that big wave moment for crypto. We can’t miss our window to get the CLARITY Act done. You never know when you’ll have another chance to ride.
English
5
8
46
4.1K
Ben Napier retweetledi
World
World@worldnetwork·
As millions of agents start to come online, the internet needs to distinguish bot armies from the agents acting on behalf of humans. Introducing AgentKit, the human layer for agentic automation. Built on World ID, the AgentKit beta unlocks human-verified automation, a new primitive for the agent economy.
GIF
English
129
183
1.1K
1.5M
Ben Napier retweetledi
Benjamin Guggenheim
Benjamin Guggenheim@ben_guggenheim·
First edition of the WP Intelligence AI & Tech Brief is out 🚨🚨🚨 Read here for the latest on discussions between House GOP leadership, staff for David Sacks and Michael Kratsios on AI preemption + Execs weigh in on job displacement in their industries washingtonpost.com/wp-intelligenc…
English
0
5
12
3.4K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Jason Walls
Jason Walls@walls_jason1·
Yesterday Mark Cuban reposted my work, DM'd me, and told me to keep telling my story. So here it is. I'm a Master Electrician. IBEW Local 369. 15 years pulling wire in Kentucky. Zero coding background. I didn't go to Stanford. I went to trade school. Every week I'd show up to a home where someone just bought a Tesla or a Rivian. And every time, someone had already told them they needed a $3,000-$5,000 panel upgrade to install a charger. 70% of the time? They didn't need it. The math is in the NEC — Section 220.82. Load calculations. But nobody was doing them for homeowners. Electricians upsell. Dealers don't know. And the homeowner just pays. I got angry enough to build something about it. I found @claudeai. No coding experience. I just started talking to it like I'd explain a job to an apprentice. "Here's how load calcs work. Here's the NEC code. Now help me build a tool that does this." 6 months later — @ChargeRight is live. Real software. Stripe payments. PDF reports. NEC 220.82 calculations automated. $12.99 instead of a $500 truck roll. I'm still pulling wire. I still take service calls. I wake up at 5:05 AM for work. But something shifted. Yesterday @vivilinsv published my story as Claude Builder Spotlight #1. Mark Cuban saw it. The Claude community showed up. And for the first time, I felt like this thing I built in my kitchen might actually matter. I'm not a tech founder. I'm a dad who wants to coach little league and be home for dinner. I just happened to build something that helps people. If you're in the trades and thinking about using AI — do it. The barrier isn't technical skill. It's believing you're allowed to try. EVchargeright.com
English
601
2.2K
16.3K
885.9K
Ben Napier retweetledi
drew coffman 𝕚𝕤 𝕠𝕟𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖 🟢
i'm joining @a16zcrypto to shape their social strategy. crypto is the most interesting technology being built today, but most of the world still just doesn't get it. telling that story well requires long-term thinking from long-term believers, and a16z is the place to do it. couldn't be more ready for this one.
TBPN@tbpn

BREAKING: @drewcoffman is joining a16z crypto to lead social

English
240
16
811
56.8K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
Overheard in Silicon Valley: “The current brainiac position is that AI *should* dictate war policy to the government but *should not* answer questions about your hangnail.”
English
137
344
4.7K
334.5K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Hayden Adams 🦄
Hayden Adams 🦄@haydenzadams·
🦄 Uniswap wins another case that sets a new legal prescendent TLDR: If you write open source smart contract code, and the code is used by scammers, the scammers are liable, not the open source devs Good, sensible outcome
Brian@N0th1n3

Another day, another precedent-setting ruling for DeFi. Today, Judge Failla dismissed with prejudice the Risley class action against @Uniswap Labs and @haydenzadams. The Federal charges had previously been dismissed, and today the various state claims are dismissed. Again, the premise is simple: “Plaintiffs’ theories of liability are still predicated on Defendants having ‘facilitated’ the scam trades ‘by providing a marketplace and facilities for bringing together buyers and sellers of Tokens[.]’ Though the claims have changed, the result is the same: Plaintiffs cannot hold Defendants liable for the misconduct of the unidentified third-party issuers.” To take my favorite quote from the last dismissal: It “‘defies logic’ that a drafter of a smart contract, a computer code, could be held liable … for a third party user’s misuse of the platform.” Read the opinion here: courtlistener.com/docket/6321327…

English
96
175
1.3K
101.6K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Collin McCune
Collin McCune@Collin_McCune·
The yield conversation continues, but real work has been done over the past month. Ignore the posturing. Progress is also being made on the non-stablecoin related provisions in the CLARITY Act. @CryptoAmerica_ Thanks for having me on!
English
9
36
188
20.4K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Build American AI
Build American AI@BuildAmericanAI·
First we build. Then we lead. Build American AI.
English
7
14
43
5.4K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Governor Tate Reeves
Governor Tate Reeves@tatereeves·
I understand individuals who would rather not have any industrial project in their backyard. We all choose where to live, whether it’s urban, suburban, agrarian, or industrial. I do not understand the impulse to prevent our country from advancing technologically—except as civilizational suicide. This instinct seems to infect the far left across lots of domains: immigration, crime fighting, and the national debt to name a few. You can tell they’re just sort of yearning to submit our society to outside forces: mobs, international councils, or communist China. Maybe they’re exhausted and just want a few years of taxpayer-funded rest before they shuffle off. I don’t want to go gently. I love this country, and want her to rise. That’s why Mississippi has become the home of the world’s most impressive supercomputers. We are committed to America and American power. We know that being the hub of the world’s most awesome technology will inevitably bring prosperity and authority to our state. There is nobody better than Mississippians to wield it. I am tempted to sit back and let other states fritter away the generational chance to build. To laugh at their short-sightedness. But the best path for all of us would be to see America dominate, because our foes are not like us. They don’t believe in order, except brutal order under their heels. They don’t believe in prosperity, except for that gained through fraud and plunder. They don’t think or act in a way I can respect as an American. So, let’s see Americans (and Mississippians) dominate this space—no matter how many leftists want us to roll over and die instead.
Sen. Bernie Sanders@SenSanders

Yes. We need a moratorium on data center construction.

English
211
266
2.5K
451.1K
Ben Napier retweetledi
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
I really want people to see the story above the story here, which is that whether you're reading Citrini, or listening to Jamie Dimon at a cocktial party, the conversation about AI is a marketplace of competing science fiction narratives. That's not to say I think the technology is a parlor trick. But rather that the level of uncertainty is so high, and the quality and supply of real-world, real-time information about AI's macroeconomic effects so paltry, that very serious conversations about AI are often more literary than genuinely analytical. And I think that observation sets up another important point: I feel lucky to be able to have conversations about the frontier of AI with executives and builders at frontier labs; economists at AI conferences; investors in AI; and other AI folks at off-the-record dinners where important truths can theoretically be shared without risk. I can't emphasize enough that "nobody knows anything" is about as close to the reality here as three words are going to get you. Nobody what's going to happen this year, or next year, or the year after that. There is no secret cigar-filled room of people who have unique access to some authentic postcard from the future. When you drill down underneath the bluster, the boosterism, the fear, the anxiety, what's there at the bottom is genuine uncertainty, a vacuum into which storytelling is flooding. The frontier labs don't really know what they're building exactly, and economists don't really know how to model the thing they claim they're building (genuine recursively self-improving AI agency isn't really analogous to something we know about). I wish more people talked about and thought about this subject thru that sort of lens: We're trying to model the economy-wide effects of a technology whose properties the frontier labs can't even really describe yet. Whatever you think about AI today, be prepared to change your mind soon.
Brian Sozzi@BrianSozzi

JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon at an investor cocktail event last night on AI (part 2): "What if, I think there are 2 million commercial truckers in the United States, and there are lots of other examples you can give. There's a thought exercise, and you could push a button, eliminate all of them, and they make $120,000 on average. Save fuel, save lives, save time, a more efficient system, less disrupted highways, all that beautiful stuff. Would you do it if you put 2 million people on the street where even if there are jobs available, that next job is $25,000 a year, stocking shelves. I was saying, "That's kind of really bad, kind of civilly, should we as society agree to that?" I don't think so. I was talking about the business and government, and they should start thinking today, not when it happens, what would we do to deal with the [AI] issue? It's got to be business and government."

English
93
233
2.1K
673K