Hugh Butler

4.2K posts

Hugh Butler banner
Hugh Butler

Hugh Butler

@HughButler35

Author, research, innovation, angel investor, strategic management. Start-up in datacomms, solar. Medicine. 310 ppm @hughbutler35.bsky.social

Qld, Australia Katılım Temmuz 2010
557 Takip Edilen480 Takipçiler
Hugh Butler
Hugh Butler@HughButler35·
@renewablesmiffy Of course. The area is less than golf courses. less than Xmas tree nurseries. 50% of rooftops Less than coal mines, gas right of ways, railways and mine tailings. Never let that get in the way of fossil fuel companies executives lies.
Ubud, Indonesia 🇮🇩 English
0
0
0
6
Chris Smith
Chris Smith@renewablesmiffy·
@HughButler35 You understand they can still farm land with renewables and pylons?
English
0
0
1
22
Hugh Butler
Hugh Butler@HughButler35·
@EVCurveFuturist Net effect. Money in your pocket, not despots such as the 24 oil exporters
Hugh Butler tweet media
Ubud, Indonesia 🇮🇩 English
0
0
0
2
Chris Meder
Chris Meder@EVCurveFuturist·
ICE cars burn fuel to move. #EVs convert electrons into smiles. One system turns energy into heat, noise & weekly bills. The other turns it into motion, silence, & savings. This isn’t preference. It’s physics. Cost curves don’t lie. Once you drive electric, there’s no going back.
Chris Meder tweet media
English
12
9
54
1.2K
Hugh Butler
Hugh Butler@HughButler35·
@cglassey_author Have you tried reading? It’s not hard and it doesn’t hurt. Ignorance can be cured if you ask for help.
Hugh Butler tweet media
Ubud, Indonesia 🇮🇩 English
0
0
2
65
Don
Don@Donsvess·
Once again, we rely on COAL & GAS to supply 88.54% of our electricity needs. Without coal & gas 88% of us would be in blackout. Bowen's "Wind & Solar only" policy is supplying just 11% of our needs. Thank goodness for COAL & GAS!! Poor old Australia under Bowen & LABOR!!!
peter lofay 🇦🇺@LofayPeter

Good evening Australia 6-20 pm AEST 25 May 2026 Variable renewable energy is not supplying 88.54% of your current electricity needs ( 30.60 GW ) @AlboMP @PMalinauskasMP @LilyDAmbrosioMP #auspol

English
15
22
42
1.2K
Hugh Butler
Hugh Butler@HughButler35·
@HenrykK246 @ICannot_Enough There's 1) technology 2) Economics 3) Politics and belief system Numbers don't lie. Flatline Economics. Read IR report So only left with a belief system that the sun shines out of Elon's arse. To pretend no brand damage was done. Do you believe in father Xmas?
Gerokgak, Indonesia 🇮🇩 English
0
0
0
110
Henryk Krol
Henryk Krol@HenrykK246·
To all who said Elon hurt the brand. He built the brand, protected free speech, tried to save our/ taxpayers money from corrupt government and he value truth and principles over money. I wish our politicians had strong morals like him. You all complainers would sell your soul for money, he didn't.
English
14
26
445
19.3K
James Stephenson
James Stephenson@ICannot_Enough·
2 years ago: "Elon destroyed the Tesla brand globally! It'll never recover!" Today: #1 selling EV in California: Tesla Model Y #1 selling EV in the U.S.: Tesla Model Y #1 selling EV in Europe: Tesla Model Y #1 selling EV in China: Tesla Model Y
English
690
1.2K
18.8K
41.6M
Hugh Butler retweetledi
Mark Z. Jacobson
Mark Z. Jacobson@mzjacobson·
Great news! New Q1 U.S. data show that not only do higher penetrations of WindWaterSolar still correlate with lower residential retail electricity prices in the U.S., but that correlation has strengthened in just three months! What is more, of the 16 states that met 37% to 126% of their grid+BTM demand with WWS from Q2-25 to Q1-26, 14 had prices 1.5-5.5 cents/kWh BELOW the U.S. average! -->claims that increasing WWS increases prices are not true web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jac…
Mark Z. Jacobson tweet media
English
1
27
55
10.9K
Mark Z. Jacobson
Mark Z. Jacobson@mzjacobson·
What can you do if you are tired of wasting money on gasoline? Did you know that every 30 miles of driving a gasoline car, you spend three to five dollars more than driving the same 30 miles in an electric car? That adds up to about $20,000 to $40,000 more in fuel cost for the gasoline car when driving the U.S. average of 15,000 miles per year for 15 years. So, even if the electric car costs $5,000 more upfront than the gasoline car you save $15,000 to $35,000 over 15 years. Think about that if you are tired of losing money every single day due to high gasoline prices. Think also of how, with an electric car, you reduce air pollution exposure to your family, your neighbors, and everyone in your city, because vehicle exhaust is toxic and worldwide, contributes to 1 to 2 million air pollution deaths per year. Stay safe and healthy with a battery-electric car. More info: Still No Miracles Needed (@CambridgeUP ) web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jac… Video: youtube.com/shorts/jBd0kgJ…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
16
34
86
3.1K
Jon Snowick
Jon Snowick@mcdev·
Questions: Where will these charge? How frequently will the charging parks be placed upon highways and major thoroughfares? Who pays for the charging station infrastructure? Will the trucks be charged $ to charge? Will these be subsidized charging locations for these trucks only or publicly available as well?
English
7
0
1
2K
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
The official production Tesla Semi battery sizes have been revealed for both trims in a public regulatory filing. Tesla Semi Long Range: • Usable battery capacity: 822kWh • Chemistry: NMCA (4680 cells) • Range: 500 miles (at 82k lbs gross combination weight) • Peak charging speed: 1,200kW (1.2MW) Tesla Semi Standard Range: • Usable battery capacity: 548kWh • Chemistry: NMCA (4680 cell) • Range: 325 miles (at 82k lbs gross combination weight) • Peak charging speed: 1,200kW (1.2MW)
Sawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet media
English
114
389
3.3K
226.3K
Hugh Butler
Hugh Butler@HughButler35·
70 pages of hallucination. You lost all credibility down 20 lines when you mentioned thorium reactors. Reality vs hopium Reminds me of the 20 well meaning scientists and experts who said Prof Mark Jacobson was wrong about his WWW in 2003. Still saying he was wrong 25 years later. Not saying he got it right. Certainly more than those others. optimisticstorm.com/153-countries-… Suggest that IRENA has a better take on it. irena.org/-/media/Files/…
Hugh Butler tweet mediaHugh Butler tweet mediaHugh Butler tweet mediaHugh Butler tweet media
English
0
1
4
227
David Siegel
David Siegel@PullNews·
English
64
85
310
16.8K
Roberts Carlos
Roberts Carlos@RobertsCarlos_·
@McguinThe @Peter_Fitz In 2013 nobody was saying that Labor was done after there was a liberal landslide against the Gillard government. The pendulum swings back and forth in Australia eventually it will swing back after Labor has its term.
English
1
0
1
83
Hugh Butler retweetledi
Chris Meder
Chris Meder@EVCurveFuturist·
Germany shut nuclear. Critics said the system would fail. But zoom out. Wind & solar went from ~1% to ~45%, renewables from ~6% to ~56%, and fossil is getting squeezed. Messy in the middle, clear direction. This isn’t collapse. It’s system replacement playing out. #Bettrification Generation didn’t collapse. It followed demand. After the energy shock, consumption fell and the system adjusted through efficiency, imports, and lower output. Germany still runs one of the most reliable grids in the world, so the idea that industry couldn’t get power doesn’t hold. 👉 No systemic power shortages 👉 Industry response was to price, not supply 👉 Gas drove electricity costs higher during the crisis That’s the real story. Energy-intensive sectors were hit by a cost shock, not a lack of electricity. Some output was reduced, some production shifted, but that’s about competitiveness under high prices, not the system failing. Prices spiked hard. German households were paying ~€0.47/kWh at the peak in 2022–2023. That’s now down to roughly ~€0.33–€0.39/kWh depending on contract in 2025–2026. Wholesale power collapsed from €300+/MWh peaks back to roughly €70–€100/MWh range. So prices are falling, but still above pre-2022 levels. That’s because gas still sets the marginal price, not because renewables are failing. Critics said this wouldn’t work. That removing nuclear would break the system. But while the debate fixated there, wind and solar kept scaling anyway, moving from marginal to the backbone of the system. Even in 2025, with weaker wind and lower hydro, the trend held. Solar surged and the system adapted, exactly what a transition under load looks like. Germany isn’t finished. Fossil is still balancing, storage is still scaling, and the middle is messy. But the direction is clear. This isn’t transition. It’s another system replacement.
Chris Meder tweet media
English
32
83
196
6.3K
Debra H
Debra H@dehiggs5·
@ProfRayWills I guess it depends on which “ professor” you listen to
Debra H tweet media
English
2
0
0
73
Peter FitzSimons
Peter FitzSimons@Peter_Fitz·
Two principal reasons, as I understand it. 1. The remaining fossil fuel infrastructure is aging & expensive. 2. There are too few major energy companies, restricting market forces to drive prices down. People getting their own solar and batteries helps alleviate both factors.
Numb Skull@MyCatsNamesMitn

@Peter_Fitz Why are my power bills going straight north?

English
17
26
141
8.1K
Hugh Butler
Hugh Butler@HughButler35·
@loudenclear111 @MikeCarlton01 Laughing 😂. Does your granddaughter think you are weird? Are you that uncle sitting in the corner of the family room that everyone avoids. Brain dead?
Hugh Butler tweet media
English
0
0
0
12
Louden Clear
Louden Clear@loudenclear111·
@HughButler35 @MikeCarlton01 Your male feminist credentials won`t stop someone like Britanny Higgins from doing the same thing to you. They hate you more than they hate actual men.
English
1
0
2
156
Mike Carlton
Mike Carlton@MikeCarlton01·
Lisa and Peter are my dear friends. They paid a heavy financial and emotional price for this, for standing for the truth. But they were strong and never wavered, and at last they have been vindicated.
Lisa Wilkinson@Lisa_Wilkinson

English
117
527
3.2K
53.1K