Sabitlenmiş Tweet

🎨 Who owns #Creativity in the age of #AI ?
The U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case on AI-generated copyright — leaving intact a key legal principle: under current U.S. law, authorship remains human.
But the bigger story is global.
Across jurisdictions we’re seeing different approaches to the same question:
🇺🇸 The U.S. continues to anchor copyright in human authorship.
🇬🇧 The UK recognises “computer-generated works” under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
🇦🇺 Australia emphasises “independent intellectual effort” under the Copyright Act 1968.
🇪🇺 The EU AI Act introduces new transparency obligations for generative AI systems.
⚖️Different #Legal frameworks.
Different assumptions about creativity.
And potentially very different implications for creators, businesses, and innovation.
In this latest Global AI Governance Watch, I explore how these emerging legal interpretations may shape the future of authorship, accountability, and trust in the AI era.
🎨If creativity is increasingly collaborative between humans and machines, the question may not simply be who creates — but how we recognise and protect that creativity.
📖 Full article in my latest newsletter below ↙️
🔗bit.ly/4sokOBI #LinkedIn
I would love to hear your thoughts
Warmest wishes, Sally
#AIGovernance #Copyright #TechForGood #GovTech #Regulation #Author @Nicochan33 #tech #analyst @ahier @smaksked @kalydeoo @gvalan @RLDI_Lamy
#Governance @domingonarvaez1 #CyberSecurity #ML @DrFerdowsi @ScottWLuton @RobTiffany
#data @sulefati7 @baski_LA @timo_vi @TAEVisionAPP
#law #GenAI @terence_mills @gezgintrk @ipfconline1
@bamitav @nomoreslaves @Ym78200 #Lawyers @rvp
#create @Corix_JC @CurieuxExplorer @ILoveBooks786

English






















